Pope Francis and the Latin Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter SubjectVerb
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
edant.clarin.com/diario/2007/09/17/sociedad/s-03001.html

This article, from 2007 states that Pope Francis, when he was Archbishop, made arrangements for the EF of the Mass to be offered within 48 hours of Summorum Pontificum being released. Here is the English translation (emphasis mine)

The translation is a bit rough being from Google translator, but it would appear from this article that our Holy Father made arrangements to have a fixed location for the EF of the Mass very soon after Pope Benedict’s Motu Proprio was released.
Good enough. Thanks for that. Encouraging.
 
edant.clarin.com/diario/2007/09/17/sociedad/s-03001.html

This article, from 2007 states that Pope Francis, when he was Archbishop, made arrangements for the EF of the Mass to be offered within 48 hours of Summorum Pontificum being released. Here is the English translation (emphasis mine)

The translation is a bit rough being from Google translator, but it would appear from this article that our Holy Father made arrangements to have a fixed location for the EF of the Mass very soon after Pope Benedict’s Motu Proprio was released.
I do agree that it is quite encouraging. I’m guessing someone doesn’t find it so, however, because it looks like the link has been scrubbed from the website. Even doing a search, nothing comes up.

buscador.clarin.com/diario?filter=content_section:Sociedad;&from=01/09/2007&to=30/09/2007&page=3&
 
I do agree that it is quite encouraging. I’m guessing someone doesn’t find it so, however, because it looks like the link has been scrubbed from the website. Even doing a search, nothing comes up.

buscador.clarin.com/diario?filter=content_section:Sociedad;&from=01/09/2007&to=30/09/2007&page=3&
Very odd. I wonder why that would happen? What could possibly be the harm in knowing that situation?

So that we have it. Here is the original Spanish as well.
SE CELEBRO POR PRIMERA VEZ EN EL PAIS DESDE QUE EL PAPA LA AUTORIZO
Regresó la misa en latín, con mujeres cubiertas por mantillas
Un centenar de fieles conocedores de la vieja liturgia estuvieron ayer en San Miguel Arcángel.
Cuatro décadas después de que la misa en latín con el sacerdote oficiando de cara al altar fuese reemplazada por el oficio en la lengua de cada país y de frente a los fieles, el antiguo modo de celebrarla fue rehabilitado ayer en una iglesia de Buenos Aires. Fue ante un centenar de fieles deseosos de participar de la forma tradicional.
La celebración se produjo 48 horas después de que el papa Benedicto XVI firmara el decreto (motu proprio) que libera esa modalidad. Hasta el viernes, la misa en latín requería la autorización del obispo del lugar, trámite que ya no será necesario. Desde ahora, ante un pedido de los fieles, el sacerdote deberá acceder.
Con todo, el arzobispo de Buenos Aires, cardenal Jorge Bergoglio, dispuso una celebración fija en su jurisdicción para ofrecerles a los fieles porteños un lugar específico y esquivar el problema de que muchos sacerdotes no saben oficiarla.
La parroquia es San Miguel Arcángel, en el microcentro. Su párroco, Ricardo Dotro, es experto en liturgia. Tuvo que desempolvar la última versión del antiguo misal, de 1962, disponer el altar, poner seis velas en lugar de dos y conseguir un organista que conociera los viejos cánticos.
“In nómine Patris, et Filii et Spiritus Sancti”, dijo Dotro pasadas las 10, al recitar la señal de la cruz con que comenzó el oficio. Fieles mayoritariamente adultos y ancianos, aunque también algunos jóvenes, varias mujeres con mantilla, y casi todos con misal, lo seguían con unción. Las mujeres tenían, además, polleras bastante largas. Llamaba la atención una familia con tres nenas, todas con mantilla.
Muchos de los asistentes parecían muy conocedores de la antigua liturgia. Incluso, no faltaron algunos que deslizaron cierta molestia porque la celebración no fue, a su juicio, totalmente por el modo antiguo y se mezcló con elementos actuales.
La comunión fue recibida de rodillas, junto al altar y en la boca. No hubo saludo de paz, ni oración de los fieles, ni procesión de ofrendas.“Este modo de oficiar la misa enriquece mucho la celebración porque tiene en cuenta los elementos de una antigua tradición litúrgica”, dijo al salir Fabián, de 45 años. A su vez, Carolina, de 21 años, estudiante de filosofía, consideró que este modo “me eleva espiritualmente mucho más”.
El padre Dotro no hizo en su homilía ninguna mención al modo en que la celebraba. Luego, pidió a los periodistas que no dijeran que es la misa tridentina, sino “el modo extraordinario del rito romano”. Así buscó acotar la polémica que suscitó su rehabilitación.
ENVIAR IMPRIMIR
 
I think that we have to be careful not to go to extremes. First of all, no pope is superman and Jesus was not running for pope.

There are many important issues facing the new pope. He has to prioritize. While to the traditionalist the Extraordinary Form of the mass may seen like a priority, to a pope who takes the name Francis, it may not be on his top ten list of issues to deal with.

He is famous for not allowing anyone to call him Your Eminence, Your Excellency or chauffeur him around. He is Jorge or simply Father Jorge to the people of Buenos Aires.

He is very committed to the life of prayer, detachment from material things, and proclaiming the Gospel to the poorest of the poor.

He is committed to Christian unity with other Christians.

He loves his Jesuit order.

He is also very committed to the ideals of St. Francis of Assisi – commitment to preaching, penance, reform the Church from a triumphalist Church to a humble Church. It is very likely that he will focus on cleaning house inside the Vatican infrastructure.

I think he set the tone of his papacy with his greeting. The first thing that he asked the people to do was to pray with him, then pray for him. Both of these are gestures that the Seraphic Father did while he was superior general of our order.

His second gesture was his refusal to wear the typical red worn by popes as they come to the Loggia for their first blessing. It reflected his simplicity and the simplicity that he hopes to bring to the Church. We’ll be seeing less pomp and circumstance and greater simplicity.

His third gesture was walking past the papal limousine that was to take him to the hotel. Instead, he boarded the bus along with the other cardinals.

In addition, we must remember that the liturgical reform begun by Pope Benedict was not about imposing the EF on the Church. It was about cleaning the OF of the nonsense that people have inserted into it, so that it is what it’s meant to be, a prayer and act of worship. As an admirer of the Seraphic Father, I can see him continue this work.

Remember, St. Francis banned Gregorian Chant from his houses. The Tridentine Mass adopted by Trent and later tweaked by Pope Pius V, was originally celebrated by the Franciscans alone. No one else used it. Pope Pius inserted the Gregorian Chant and a few other details that were not there: prayers at the foot of the altar, a final Gospel, the preparation of the gifts at the offertory. When the Franciscans celebrated it, the mass did not have these components. There were few distinctions between the priest and the laity. The friars were not allowed to distinguish themselves as priests – those who were priests. Not all friars are priests.

After the reforms by Pope Pius V, the Franciscans never embraced these reforms and were not expected to do so. It was only later that some superiors insisted on adopting them. The adoption was never uniform to the entire Franciscan order.

The point that I’m making is not against the EF, but I’m trying to explain that if he is true to the vision of St. Francis, his focus will be in reforming the liturgy so that it is an act of worship, be it in the Ordinary or Extraordinary form. Rebuilding the Church is not about one form of the mass over the other, but about praying the mass as it should be prayed in any form and any rite.

I don’t know how true this is, but I heard that in using the EF in his diocese, his requirement was that it be celebrated as most Franciscan superiors insist that their friar priests do, using the current liturgical calendar and allowing non-ordained men or women read the epistle. I read this on some blog. You can’t always trust what you read on blogs.
 
The fourth one down on that link certainly appears to be within the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires.

Villa Celina, Buenos Aires
Av. Avelino Díaz 1020.
The 4th on the list is Mar de Plata which is located in the Diocese of Mar de Plata
 
The others either no longer offer the Extraordinary Form or are SSPX or some other group. These all appear to be diocesan in nature… All of the above are outside of the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires. The only Extraordinary Form Mass in the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires is at an SSPX Chapel.
Annuntio vobis that there is a diocesan Sunday TLM, in central Buenos Aires, which is on the regular, posted schedule of the parish. It is at Nuestra Señora del Carmen, Rodriguez Peña 840, C.A.B.A. Mass is at 9:00 A.M.; it is at the side altar on the left-hand side, which is ad orientem (actually the priest ends up facing due west, but the important part is that he is not facing the people).

Gaudium magnum I can’t call it, though, as only about five to eight people go. That is not a hyperbolic way of saying that “few” people go; I really mean, numerically, five to eight souls. For those who wonder why Pope Francis did not go wild opening Latin Mass Centers in Buenos Aires … it might be due to lack of demand.
 
In addition, we must remember that the liturgical reform begun by Pope Benedict was not about imposing the EF on the Church. It was about cleaning the OF of the nonsense that people have inserted into it, so that it is what it’s meant to be, a prayer and act of worship. As an admirer of the Seraphic Father, I can see him continue this work.
Agreed, and my biggest hope is that Pope Francis continues this work so that the OF of the Mass can be everything it should be.
Remember, St. Francis banned Gregorian Chant from his houses. The Tridentine Mass adopted by Trent and later tweaked by Pope Pius V, was originally celebrated by the Franciscans alone. No one else used it. Pope Pius inserted the Gregorian Chant and a few other details that were not there: prayers at the foot of the altar, a final Gospel, the preparation of the gifts at the offertory. When the Franciscans celebrated it, the mass did not have these components. There were few distinctions between the priest and the laity. The friars were not allowed to distinguish themselves as priests – those who were priests. Not all friars are priests.
After the reforms by Pope Pius V, the Franciscans never embraced these reforms and were not expected to do so. It was only later that some superiors insisted on adopting them. The adoption was never uniform to the entire Franciscan order.
Very true Brother, of course. However, there are a few issues, the first being that Pope Francis is not a Franciscan, and the second being that the rules that St. Francis had for his order are not indicative of the norms for the universal Church. When the Church celebrated the EF of the Mass, they did have those things. You opened your post by saying we have to be careful. I agree with your premise. If I might suggest something for you though, it is that we have to be careful not to project St. Francis’ norms for his friars onto the entire Catholic Church.
I don’t know how true this is, but I heard that in using the EF in his diocese, his requirement was that it be celebrated as most Franciscan superiors insist that their friar priests do, using the current liturgical calendar and allowing non-ordained men or women read the epistle. I read this on some blog. You can’t always trust what you read on blogs.
If its true, then it is concerning. If the Mass was not be celebrated in the setting of exempt religious to warrant such a change, it should be celebrated per the norms of the Missal they are using. Again, he is not a Franciscan and neither were the parishes in his Archdiocese.
 
If I might suggest something for you though, it is that we have to be careful not to project St. Francis’ norms for his friars onto the entire Catholic Church.
I realize this. You’re right, of course. I introduced this, because what I’ve heard from his Jesuit confreres is that he follows the Franciscans MO very closely.
If its true, then it is concerning. If the Mass was not be celebrated in the setting of exempt religious to warrant such a change, it should be celebrated per the norms of the Missal they are using. Again, he is not a Franciscan and neither were the parishes in his Archdiocese.
Concerning? Yes and no. We know that it was Pope Benedict’s idea that there be an integration of the two calendars. The idea is not new or outrageous. It certainly does not change the form of the Extraordinary Form. We’re talking about celebrating this feast or that feast, which is not found in the old calendar. My community does this in our parishes as well as our houses. Priests or bishops who want a unified liturgical calendar have to figure out how to get around the difficulties.

As I said, I read this on a traditionalist blog that was less than flattering to the new pope. You have to read such blogs with a grain of salt, because so many have an ax to grind.
 
I don’t know how true this is, but I heard that in using the EF in his diocese, his requirement was that it be celebrated as most Franciscan superiors insist that their friar priests do, using the current liturgical calendar and allowing non-ordained men or women read the epistle. I read this on some blog. You can’t always trust what you read on blogs.
I hope it’s not true. If it is it’s a blatant rejection of the conditions BXVI set forth that the 1962 Missal be used.
 
I would agree that is probably not at the top of the agenda, nor should it be. Probably shouldn’t be in the top 10
But celebrating the liturgy of the Mass is the number one thing we do as Catholics. The more people who go, the more people who understand what is happening and the more people who, with the eyes of faith, “Behold the Lamb of God… [he] who takes away the sins of the world” the better.
 
edant.clarin.com/diario/2007/09/17/sociedad/s-03001.html

This article, from 2007 states that Pope Francis, when he was Archbishop, made arrangements for the EF of the Mass to be offered within 48 hours of Summorum Pontificum being released. Here is the English translation (emphasis mine)

The translation is a bit rough being from Google translator, but it would appear from this article that our Holy Father made arrangements to have a fixed location for the EF of the Mass very soon after Pope Benedict’s Motu Proprio was released.
Thank you
 
In Buenos Aires or somewhere else? When I was in Chile most of the churches I saw were older buildings rather than new construction. Interesting that your friend only saw modern looking churches - guess that’s a good sign of growth even if he didn’t like the architechture! 🙂
It can’t have been Buenos Aires. I lived there for six months when I was a protestant - the Catholic Churches I saw just amazed me. Nothing like the protestant churches I was used to.
 
As a former Protestant and later on liberal Catholic who eventually found to a true Catholic spiritual life thanks to the traditional Mass, I have my concerns, too. I must admit that I even was disappointed when I heard his name (I had favored Robert Cardinal Sarah), nevertheless I prayed for him.

But here comes the important part:

He is our Holy Father, our Pope.
We are Catholics.

Period. I for my part will definitely NOT engage in the Protestant way of thinking that messed so much up in our Church.

So unless he starts preaching clearly heretical stuff, we are bound by divine command to obey him and pray for him. And that is what we will do.

When Benedict XVI started wearing/using some of the obsolete “regalia” of a Pontiff I was first taken aback. I didn’t really like it. But as I got to know him better as a priest, theologian and Pope I started to understand his rationale, his motives and finally wholeheartedly took to it myself. So if Pope Francis goes the opposite way and renounces much of those trappings, I am sure I will come to understand it, too, if it is an authentic reflection of his teaching and his humility.

Now the really important question IMHO is: who will he elect as Cardinal Secretary of State? If it’s, e.g., Cardinal Scola, he might be able to actually cleanse the Curia.
 
But celebrating the liturgy of the Mass is the number one thing we do as Catholics. The more people who go, the more people who understand what is happening and the more people who, with the eyes of faith, “Behold the Lamb of God… [he] who takes away the sins of the world” the better.
I totally agree that Mass and the Eucharist are our greatest form of worship… We have a beautiful liturgy. I’m not saying to scap it. I’m saying that reforming the liturgy we have should not be in the top priorities. We should focus on bring Catholics back to the Church and bringing the Gospel to non-Catholics…and feeding the Hungary, clothing the naked and sheltering the homeless.
 
I think that we have to be careful not to go to extremes. First of all, no pope is superman and Jesus was not running for pope.

There are many important issues facing the new pope. He has to prioritize. While to the traditionalist the Extraordinary Form of the mass may seen like a priority, to a pope who takes the name Francis, it may not be on his top ten list of issues to deal with.

He is famous for not allowing anyone to call him Your Eminence, Your Excellency or chauffeur him around. He is Jorge or simply Father Jorge to the people of Buenos Aires.

He is very committed to the life of prayer, detachment from material things, and proclaiming the Gospel to the poorest of the poor.

He is committed to Christian unity with other Christians.

He loves his Jesuit order.

He is also very committed to the ideals of St. Francis of Assisi – commitment to preaching, penance, reform the Church from a triumphalist Church to a humble Church. It is very likely that he will focus on cleaning house inside the Vatican infrastructure.

I think he set the tone of his papacy with his greeting. The first thing that he asked the people to do was to pray with him, then pray for him. Both of these are gestures that the Seraphic Father did while he was superior general of our order.

His second gesture was his refusal to wear the typical red worn by popes as they come to the Loggia for their first blessing. It reflected his simplicity and the simplicity that he hopes to bring to the Church. We’ll be seeing less pomp and circumstance and greater simplicity.

His third gesture was walking past the papal limousine that was to take him to the hotel. Instead, he boarded the bus along with the other cardinals.

In addition, we must remember that the liturgical reform begun by Pope Benedict was not about imposing the EF on the Church. It was about cleaning the OF of the nonsense that people have inserted into it, so that it is what it’s meant to be, a prayer and act of worship. As an admirer of the Seraphic Father, I can see him continue this work.

Remember, St. Francis banned Gregorian Chant from his houses. The Tridentine Mass adopted by Trent and later tweaked by Pope Pius V, was originally celebrated by the Franciscans alone. No one else used it. Pope Pius inserted the Gregorian Chant and a few other details that were not there: prayers at the foot of the altar, a final Gospel, the preparation of the gifts at the offertory. When the Franciscans celebrated it, the mass did not have these components. There were few distinctions between the priest and the laity. The friars were not allowed to distinguish themselves as priests – those who were priests. Not all friars are priests.

After the reforms by Pope Pius V, the Franciscans never embraced these reforms and were not expected to do so. It was only later that some superiors insisted on adopting them. The adoption was never uniform to the entire Franciscan order.

The point that I’m making is not against the EF, but I’m trying to explain that if he is true to the vision of St. Francis, his focus will be in reforming the liturgy so that it is an act of worship, be it in the Ordinary or Extraordinary form. Rebuilding the Church is not about one form of the mass over the other, but about praying the mass as it should be prayed in any form and any rite.

I don’t know how true this is, but I heard that in using the EF in his diocese, his requirement was that it be celebrated as most Franciscan superiors insist that their friar priests do, using the current liturgical calendar and allowing non-ordained men or women read the epistle. I read this on some blog. You can’t always trust what you read on blogs.
Very good post. I agree. I think it is important that we don’t pre-judge what God has called him to do. The Holy Spirit is leading us and Pope Francis hasn’t even had a chance to get started. I think it is important not to walk in fear but trust that God is leading our church. No one knows how anyone is going to act until given the chance.

I am ever so grateful that God has given us such a humble Pope.
 
I think there are more pressing matters right now. I love the EF form of the mass and attend and server at it every chance I get. The new Pope needs to clean house at the Vatican and remove those from the curia standing in the way of dealing with sex abuse scandal and growing secularism in the world, especially here in the US. He seems to be a humble man that can reach out to indifferent people and bring them back to the church.

As long as he does not touch the EF form of the mass, and I do not see him doing this, people will be happy. But I think the top of the agenda needs to be cleaning up the the scandal mess and re-evangelizing places that are growing secular.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top