Pope Francis at Mass: Praying is a bit like “annoying” God

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cartesian
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cartesian

Guest
news.va/en/news/pope-francis-at-mass-praying-is-a-bit-like-annoyin
“Maybe this sounds strange,” the Pope said, “but praying is a bit like annoying God so that he listens to us. He stressed the importance of praying with insistence and not giving up after the first few attempts. “Jesus said “ask” but he also said to us, “Knock at the door” and he or she who knocks at the door makes a noise, disturbs or annoys.”
Therefore, Pope Francis continued, “prayer is insisting to the point of annoyance but also with an unshakeable certainty.” Just like the blind people in the Gospel who asked Jesus to be healed and when he asked them if they believed he could cure them, they assured him they did. The Pope concluding by saying that Jesus feels our need when we pray and also feels that we are certain of his help and that we’re speaking the truth about ourselves.
 
Isn’t there a parable about a woman who keeps annoying a judge, and Jesus compared it to prayer? And that if even the imperfect judge would give in, how much more would God… 😃 I don’t think that’s a bad thing, then.
 
Yes. The parable of the unjust judge goes in line with what the Pope said.

I personally thought I needed to save a bit my prayers to not ‘bother’ God. Good to learn I was wrong.
 
Isn’t there a parable about a woman who keeps annoying a judge, and Jesus compared it to prayer? And that if even the imperfect judge would give in, how much more would God… 😃 I don’t think that’s a bad thing, then.
Yes, Christ also said (Luke, 11, 5-8)

He also said to them, 'Suppose one of you has a friend and goes to him in the middle of the night to say, “My friend, lend me three loaves, because a friend of mine on his travels has just arrived at my house and I have nothing to offer him;”
and the man answers from inside the house, “Do not bother me. The door is bolted now, and my children are with me in bed; I cannot get up to give it to you.”

I tell you, if the man does not get up and give it to him for friendship’s sake, persistence will make him get up and give his friend all he wants.
 
Is “annoying” the best word the translators could come up with? It seems to have negative connotations in the English.
 
I thought the quotation marks around annoying, would fit this unusual use of the verb, but English is not my native language. 🤷
 
I thought the quotation marks around annoying, would fit this unusual use of the verb, but English is not my native language. 🤷
Mine neither. That’s why I question most translations; apparently the article did to an extent as well by putting in the quotation marks around one of the words, though it’s not immediately apparent if the quotes are around the translation or the Pope’s actual words. Most seem to just assume those were his real words, though he speaks very little English.
 
Mine neither. That’s why I question most translations; apparently the article did to an extent as well by putting in the quotation marks around one of the words, though it’s not immediately apparent if the quotes are around the translation or the Pope’s actual words. Most seem to just assume those were his real words, though he speaks very little English.
Here’s a summary/a bit of the homily, but remember that although Pope Francis speaks Italian, Argentinean Italian may be a bit different from the Italian spoken in Italy, so it may affect the translation as well.

youtube.com/watch?v=rNJJd5ZCZeg
 
Here’s a summary/a bit of the homily, but remember that although Pope Francis speaks Italian, Argentinean Italian may be a bit different from the Italian spoken in Italy, so it may affect the translation as well.

youtube.com/watch?v=rNJJd5ZCZeg
I see your point. In your video it seems to take on a different meaning, if indeed he meant “annoy” in the English sense.
 
What about “thy will be done”? Should we keep on annoying God until our requests come true or should we hold an attitude of “but not according to my will but yours”? Should we be forceful and not take the answer of “no”, or should we have the mentality of gladly accepting whatever God gives?
 
The point Jesus was making is that prayer (regardless of what it is for), needs to be persistent. There is no limit or allowed quota. You can pray as much as you want, whenever you want, for as long as you want, and should aim to do so as much as possible, whether that be in asking God to help you pass your exam or asking Him to let His will be done.

If you don’t receive something that you asked for from God, then you should keep praying. It will either come eventually, or God’s will will bring something better of it. That is Jesus’ message.
 
Persisting would probably be a more accurate term, since it lacks the negative emotional response of the listener. Catholic theology does not include the concept of a God who is “annoyed” (in the English denotation) by our prayers.

(Didn’t even see post #13 until I looked back just now.)
 
Here is the original quote from the pope:

“Non so se forse questo suona male, ma pregare è un po’ dare fastidio a Dio, perché ci ascolti.”

Translated there is definitely a negative tone to bothering God, and in fact Francis points this out. Nonetheless, Francis is merely repeating the point Jesus made in his homily that was previously referenced.

In my opinion in not that God sees that we are bothersome but on the contrary this example Jesus used is for our benefit only(of course) so that we should not feel like we are bothering God, which we do of course all the time because of our basic unworthiness. I am never ceased to be amazed at God’s wisdom!
 
Here is the original quote from the pope:

“Non so se forse questo suona male, ma pregare è un po’ dare fastidio a Dio, perché ci ascolti.”

Translated there is definitely a negative tone to bothering God, and in fact Francis points this out. Nonetheless, Francis is merely repeating the point Jesus made in his homily that was previously referenced.

In my opinion in not that God sees that we are bothersome but on the contrary this example Jesus used is for our benefit only(of course) so that we should not feel like we are bothering God, which we do of course all the time because of our basic unworthiness. I am never ceased to be amazed at God’s wisdom!
The person praying may project (onto God) that he or she is “annoying” God, but God is never annoyed. And one has to be careful about using parables to ascribe human qualities to God. (Anthropomorphizing God) Parables were an oral teaching device meant to stir the imagination of the listener, to think in different dimensions about The Kingdom, and to provoke the listener to respond and act. Parables are not allegories. (I won’t go into an extended explanation, including problems with Typology because that would be for a different subforum.) 🙂
 
The person praying may project (onto God) that he or she is “annoying” God, but God is never annoyed. And one has to be careful about using parables to ascribe human qualities to God. (Anthropomorphizing God) Parables were an oral teaching device meant to stir the imagination of the listener, to think in different dimensions about The Kingdom, and to provoke the listener to respond and act. Parables are not allegories. (I won’t go into an extended explanation, including problems with Typology because that would be for a different subforum.) 🙂
I clearly stated God is not bothered by us and that the purpose of Jesus’ parable was for our benefit to not be discouraged to pray incessantly.

Also, regarding Jesus’ parables I believe most Christians who seek God’s will can understand(via the Holy Spirit) them without having a theological background.🙂
 
Also, regarding Jesus’ parables I believe most Christians who seek God’s will can understand(via the Holy Spirit) them without having a theological background.🙂
I never asserted the opposite. However, many Catholics (I don’t know about other Christians) misunderstand parables – when, for example, they mistake them for allegories. Some parables are quite straightforward; others are far more complex. Jesus’ first-century audience did not have “a theological background.” Most of them were uneducated. However, unlike the modern western world, those listeners were familiar with the parable form in oral teaching and understood more readily the messages in even the more complex ones, because they were used to that style.

For the more complex parables, some of those do actually benefit from some theological understanding. Again, that would be for the contemporary audience (lacking familiarity), not for the ancient Mediterranean audience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top