R
Obviously, this was not meant. Maybe it was different in Spanish.During the speech, delivered in Spanish, the Pope underlined the devastating consequences of war, especially in countries such as Ukraine, Syria, Iraq, Libya, South Sudan, and the Great Lakes region.
He’s probably referring to the African Great Lakes, not the American ones.This is great to read and while I’m still reading this, I found this:
Obviously, this was not meant. Maybe it was different in Spanish.
He meant the African Great Lakes Region…This is great to read and while I’m still reading this, I found this:
Obviously, this was not meant. Maybe it was different in Spanish.
Either way, while I’m sure it won’t be enough for many CAFers, I think the Pope did something great here. He framed opposition to abortion not as some arbitrary “thou shalt not” religious prohibition, but as part of a general ethic of the value of human life in general.The common home of all men and women must continue to rise on the foundations of a right understanding of universal fraternity and respect for the sacredness of every human life, of every man and every woman, the poor, the elderly, children, the infirm, the unborn, the unemployed, the abandoned, those considered disposable because they are only considered as part of a statistic. This common house of all men and women must also be built on the understanding of a certain sacredness of created nature.
It sounds like Paul VI, no? But it isn’t; that is Pope Francis.Okay, so I am a little confused. Is the following a quote from Pope Paul VI, or are they Francis’s own words?
Either way, while I’m sure it won’t be enough for many CAFers, I think the Pope did something great here. He framed opposition to abortion not as some arbitrary “thou shalt not” religious prohibition, but as part of a general ethic of the value of human life in general.
TBH, I really don’t understand why so many who call themselves “pro-life” actually distance themselves from this reasoning and really focus on being “anti-abortion” only; many don’t even seem to care much about euthanasia though most major “pro-life” groups do in their public platforms.
en.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/09/25/pope_francis_addresses_the_un_general_assembly/1174588Without the recognition of certain incontestable natural ethical limits and without the immediate implementation of those pillars of integral human development, the ideal of “saving succeeding generations from the scourge of war” (Charter of the United Nations, Preamble), and “promoting social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom” (ibid.), risks becoming an unattainable illusion, or, even worse, idle chatter which serves as a cover for all kinds of abuse and corruption, or for carrying out an ideological colonization by the imposition of anomalous models and lifestyles which are alien to people’s identity and, in the end, irresponsible.
It’s from this very address.Okay, so I am a little confused. Is the following a quote from Pope Paul VI, or are they Francis’s own words?
Either way, while I’m sure it won’t be enough for many CAFers, I think the Pope did something great here. He framed opposition to abortion not as some arbitrary “thou shalt not” religious prohibition, but as part of a general ethic of the value of human life in general.
TBH, I really don’t understand why so many who call themselves “pro-life” actually distance themselves from this reasoning and really focus on being “anti-abortion” only; many don’t even seem to care much about euthanasia though most major “pro-life” groups do in their public platforms.
Great quote.
Hmm, would I be reaching if I think the comments about “the imposition of anomalous models and lifestyles which are alien to people’s identity” is a reference to not just same-sex marriage, transgenderism, but the discrimination against people who don’t agree with such lifestyles?Great quote.I missed that one the first time around.
Emphasis mine.TBH, I really don’t understand why so many who call themselves “pro-life” actually distance themselves from this reasoning and really focus on being “anti-abortion” only; many don’t even seem to care much about euthanasia though most major “pro-life” groups do in their public platforms.
Me too. I think this flows from his whole view of the Church being a field hospital. He wants people to know that the Church’s teachings aren’t just arbitrary rules, but are all about the true flourishing of the human person.Hmm, would I be reaching if I think the comments about “the imposition of anomalous models and lifestyles which are alien to people’s identity” is a reference to not just same-sex marriage, transgenderism, but the discrimination against people who don’t agree with such lifestyles?
Obviously not ONLY SSM, but again, I like how this Pope really puts into context the reasoning for the “socially conservative” teachings of the Church as opposed to just “The Bible says it’s wrong” or “The Church says it’s wrong”.
IMHO, the best quote so far of all of the Pope’s addresses on this trip.The common home of all men and women must continue to rise on the foundations of a right understanding of universal fraternity and respect for the sacredness of every human life, of every man and every woman, the poor, the elderly, children, the infirm, the unborn, the unemployed, the abandoned, those considered disposable because they are only considered as part of a statistic. This common house of all men and women must also be built on the understanding of a certain sacredness of created nature.
Planned Parenthood is on notice along with the politicians who support them.Our world demands of all government leaders a will which is effective, practical and constant, concrete steps and immediate measures for preserving and improving the natural environment and thus putting an end as quickly as possible to the phenomenon of social and economic exclusion, with its baneful consequences: human trafficking, the marketing of human organs and tissues, the sexual exploitation of boys and girls, slave labour, including prostitution, the drug and weapons trade, terrorism and international organized crime.
You know, I think you are onto something there. More than just rattling off the things the Church is against, Pope Francis really is laying out the reasons that support the moral teachings.Hmm, would I be reaching if I think the comments about “the imposition of anomalous models and lifestyles which are alien to people’s identity” is a reference to not just same-sex marriage, transgenderism, but the discrimination against people who don’t agree with such lifestyles?
Obviously not ONLY SSM, but again, I like how this Pope really puts into context the reasoning for the “socially conservative” teachings of the Church as opposed to just “The Bible says it’s wrong” or “The Church says it’s wrong”.
Yes, I agree with this too, but Im sure 99.9% of people ALSO agree with this, so…??I like the “culture of waste” phrase. I think that really encapsulates all that Francis is speaking out against. We’re in a culture that is accustomed to throwing things away, whether it be material resources or people.