L
LilyM
Guest
God didn’t make Adam and Eve Catholic, nor reveal the fullness of the Catholic faith to Noah, Abraham or Moses. So there’s that …
Plurality of religions (at a minimum Judaism and Christianity), each being planned and willed by God and given to man by means of progressive revelation to the Old Testament patriarchs and prophets culminating with the fullness of truth in Christ’s incarnation and ministry.I’m not sure what that has to do with anything
This Skelly I totally agree with, and I would also add “religion”.I think history of the last 100 years and current events bear out that he has been unleashed in a unique way in that the nations of the world see authority as purely secular and do not recognize the Divine authority. Not in morality, not in economics, not in human rights, not in the stewardship of the earth, not in any institution.
We must seek a way to understand this without it sounding like heresy. Note well that, after that awkward phrase, the continuation speaks to our freedom to believe, etc. That hints at a solution.
God did not will a diversity of religions in the sense that all religions are equal paths to God. False religions are evil. God does not actively will evil.
@Vico best post in this thread. I should say, however, that I have regrettably come across one sect that had nothing but evil to it, although presenting itself as good. And I do hope the Catholic Church doesn’t become too permissive in institutionally engaging with those kinds of evil.Maximilian75:
Also Catechism:…
“The pluralism and the diversity of religions … are willed by God in his wisdom…”
…
843 The Catholic Church recognizes in other religions that search, among shadows and images, for the God who is unknown yet near since he gives life and breath and all things and wants all men to be saved. Thus, the Church considers all goodness and truth found in these religions as “a preparation for the Gospel and given by him who enlightens all men that they may at length have life.” 332
332 LG 16; cf. NA 2; EN 53.
LG Lumen gentium
NA Nostra aetate
EN Evangelii nuntiandi
It’s couched in a discussion of individual freedom, in the context of choosing one’s religion. This is precisely what the Church teaches!How can this be reconciled with Church teaching?
Now, to say that God willed human freedom, knowing that He was allowing humans to make their own choices, and (being omniscient) also knowing what those choices would be, it follows that “pluralism and diversity of religions … are willed by God in His wisdom.”1747 The right to the exercise of freedom, especially in religious and moral matters, is an inalienable requirement of the dignity of man. But the exercise of freedom does not entail the putative right to say or do anything.
Huh? Are we reading the same document?The problem is the document does it backwards (maybe that’s from Islamic thought influencing it?). The document’s reasoning is that since the plurality of religions is God’s will, therefore we can’t force someone to convert.