D
Darryl1958
Guest
The Orthodoxy that the Western Catholic Church follows is just as ancient as that followed in the East. The diversity of practice that exists now was around from the very beginning.
I agree there are real theological differences, as well as practical differences, which would need to be resolved.It isn’t a question of just crankiness and a victim mentality. There are very serious differences between us, and they are not just a question of “We use Icons and a lot of Incense.”
If that were so, there would be no schism.The Orthodoxy that the Western Catholic Church follows is just as ancient as that followed in the East. The diversity of practice that exists now was around from the very beginning.
There may be an element of that. I am a Hellenized American who has never lived in the Middle East as a local. I certainly don’t pretend to understand all of the cultural nuances. However, I do know that there are theological and ecclesiological issues between us, and those certainly go beyond mere political and secular squabbles and slights.I agree there are real theological differences, as well as practical differences, which would need to be resolved.
But I wonder if some of the ill-feeling doesn’t reflect a wider cultural attribute; one of living deep in history. I may be wrong, but the impression I get is that among peoples of eastern Europe and of the Levant, the injustices of 500 years ago are as relevant today as they were back then. From what I have seen in news articles about conflicts in those regions, the passionate remembrance of history is not simply Orthodox, but Catholic and Muslim as well.
It is so, and yet there is a schism. To believe otherwise is a statement of faith and opinion, rather than of fact and history.If that were so, there would be no schism.
It’s not only a matter of 500 years ago. Look up what happened in Croatia in WWII and how Serbian Orthodox were sent to the concentration camp at Jasenovac by the Ustase.I agree there are real theological differences, as well as practical differences, which would need to be resolved.
But I wonder if some of the ill-feeling doesn’t reflect a wider cultural attribute; one of living deep in history. I may be wrong, but the impression I get is that among peoples of eastern Europe and of the Levant, the injustices of 500 years ago are as relevant today as they were back then. From what I have seen in news articles about conflicts in those regions, the passionate remembrance of history is not simply Orthodox, but Catholic and Muslim as well.
This hasn’t anything to do with religion, it has everything to do with nationalism.It’s not only a matter of 500 years ago. Look up what happened in Croatia in WWII and how Serbian Orthodox were sent to the concentration camp at Jasenovac by the Ustase.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usta%C5%A1e#Connections_with_the_Catholic_Church
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_clergy_involvement_with_the_Usta%C5%A1e
You have to keep in mind that for many orthodox nationalism and religion and two sides of the same coin.This hasn’t anything to do with religion, it has everything to do with nationalism.
You may be right, however I’ve seen several disputes between Croatians and Serbians (specially in BiH) and they had very nationalistic undertones. It is possible that I am wrong, but it seemed to me that they hated each other’s religions because of their nationality and not vice versa. The problem is that both sides had committed atrocities and still now many people suffer because of them. Peace is very very fragile there and unfortunately I can’t imagine what would happen if Catholic and Orthodox Churches reunited. I don’t think any side would be happy about it to say the least.You have to keep in mind that for many orthodox nationalism and religion and two sides of the same coin.
It was reported that some Roman Catholic priests took part in the atrocities.This hasn’t anything to do with religion, it has everything to do with nationalism.
Nonsense. Nationalism is indeed a factor, but the shenanigans in the Balkans and Eastern Europe perpetrated by the Catholic Empires and their enablers in the Latin Church certainly had a religious element.This hasn’t anything to do with religion, it has everything to do with nationalism.
If it was purely a question of nationalism, and had nothing at all to do with religion, can you explain why it was that those Serbian Orthodox who converted to Roman Catholicism in Croatia during this time of the Ustase, that they were then safe from the oppression felt by the Serbs who did not convert? The Serbs who converted to Roman Catholicism were still Serbs by nationality, were they not? Why in Croatia did the Serbian Orthodox feel hostility against them, but the Serbian Roman Catholics did not?This hasn’t anything to do with religion, it has everything to do with nationalism.
Because “nationalism” is the wrong word. It’s has more to do with orthopraxy than orthodox (little o) beliefs.If it was purely a question of nationalism, and had nothing at all to do with religion, can you explain why it was that those Serbian Orthodox who converted to Roman Catholicism in Croatia during this time of the Ustase, that they were then safe from the oppression felt by the Serbs who did not convert? The Serbs who converted to Roman Catholicism were still Serbs by nationality, were they not? Why in Croatia did the Serbian Orthodox feel hostility against them, but the Serbian Roman Catholics did not?
So you are saying there was no concerted effort to purge Orthodox because they are Orthodox, is that what you are saying?Because “nationalism” is the wrong word. It’s has more to do with orthopraxy than orthodox (little o) beliefs.
When people confuse their religious identity for national identity (i.e. Jews and Musliums) then you get things like this.
Yes, we have long memories here. Unfortunately, they are selective memories, often reinforced by selective history-teaching in schools.I agree there are real theological differences, as well as practical differences, which would need to be resolved.
But I wonder if some of the ill-feeling doesn’t reflect a wider cultural attribute; one of living deep in history. I may be wrong, but the impression I get is that among peoples of eastern Europe and of the Levant, the injustices of 500 years ago are as relevant today as they were back then. From what I have seen in news articles about conflicts in those regions, the passionate remembrance of history is not simply Orthodox, but Catholic and Muslim as well.
Many of the theological issues turn on semantics and things being lost in translation. For example, the Orthodox don’t use the word purgatory, but the essential beliefs (there is some sort of purification/transformation en route to heaven, and efficacy in prayers for the dead) are the same.There may be an element of that. I am a Hellenized American who has never lived in the Middle East as a local. I certainly don’t pretend to understand all of the cultural nuances. However, I do know that there are theological and ecclesiological issues between us, and those certainly go beyond mere political and secular squabbles and slights.
Yes, but let us also remember The Katyn Massacre when the Russians killed 20,000 Catholic Poles. And The Massacre of the Latins in 1182, which wiped out Catholics from Constantinople, killing about 60,000 Catholics. The atrocity of 1204 cannot be looked at isolation as there were treacheries and atrocities by “the other side” before as well. My point is that too often people have an unbalanced view which does not lead to unity. Both sides have sinned and we need to get beyond it.It’s not only a matter of 500 years ago. Look up what happened in Croatia in WWII and how Serbian Orthodox were sent to the concentration camp at Jasenovac by the Ustase.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usta%C5%A1e#Connections_with_the_Catholic_Church
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_clergy_involvement_with_the_Usta%C5%A1e
Sometimes the identities are so bound up that is hard to separate them. Look at the Turkish invasion of Cyprus: it can be seen as Muslims conducting jihad against Christians, and it can be seen as Turkey acting in its geopolitical national interests against an island in an unfortunate location.This hasn’t anything to do with religion, it has everything to do with nationalism.
If they did, than that is very unfortunate and at the end of the day, they are the ones who will have to stand in front of our Lord at the last judgment and answer for their deeds. But you have to remember that there was a terrible civil war going on in Yugoslavia during WW2, atrocities were happening on all sides. So blaming one or the other is pointless.It was reported that some Roman Catholic priests took part in the atrocities.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usta%C5%A1e#Connections_with_the_Catholic_Church
To the right of the “quote” button in all posts is a mult-quote button (looks like a large " with + sign). If you click it, the image will change. After selecting all of the posts you wish to quote with the multi-post, click the “Post Reply” button – and all the posts will be there. Then you can write inbetween the quotes.if somebody would be so kind to explain me how to quote multiple posts in one post
I saw today on Reddit that Cardinal Koch will be meeting with Patriarch Kyrill
crossmap.christianpost.com/news/card-koch-tomorrows-meeting-with-kirill-to-focus-on-middle-east-and-ecumenism-7697