I don’t know. Have you tried looking for one?Is there a better news source than this?
How could Pope Francis appoint a priest who “approves of abortion, gay marriage, contraception…”? These are matters of religious doctrine, are they not? Would not the Pope censure such a priest? I think that “liberal” in this context might mean the priest is liberally minded with regard to social-justice issues involving immigrants and the poor.What does “liberal” mean here? Does it mean liberal as in Democrat, or does it mean morally liberal, as in he approves of abortion, gay marriage, contraception, etc.? I dislike the latter meaning, and I haven’t seen it apply to Father Martin from what I’ve read of him. He seems quite orthodox in his beliefs and seems like a perfect fit for Pope Francis.
No Unfortunately it means morally liberal. We need to pray for all of our Preists!!!How could Pope Francis appoint a priest who “approves of abortion, gay marriage, contraception…”? These are matters of religious doctrine, are they not? Would not the Pope censure such a priest? I think that “liberal” in this context might mean the priest is liberally minded with regard to social-justice issues involving immigrants and the poor.
Are you saying that a priest is permitted to favor abortion and remain a priest without being censured by his bishop as well as the Pope?No Unfortunately it means morally liberal. We need to pray for all of our Preists!!!
By “liberal” I mean American politically liberal, which often flirts with being morally liberal and and can obscure Catholic teaching on morality, e.g. “conservative” Catholics hate gays, immigrants, and the poor.What does “liberal” mean here?
My sense is that Fr Martin has positions that annoy some people, but that don’t directly contradict Church teaching. If Church Militant had a smoking gun they wouldn’t hesitate to show it.How could Pope Francis appoint a priest who “approves of abortion, gay marriage, contraception…”? These are matters of religious doctrine, are they not? Would not the Pope censure such a priest? I think that “liberal” in this context might mean the priest is liberally minded with regard to social-justice issues involving immigrants and the poor.
This particular priest is a Jesuit and to my knowledge isn’t heterodox in his beliefs.Are you saying that a priest is permitted to favor abortion and remain a priest without being censured by his bishop as well as the Pope?
Censure? Are you kidding. Before long he’ll probably be elevated to cardinal.How could Pope Francis appoint a priest who “approves of abortion, gay marriage, contraception…”? These are matters of religious doctrine, are they not? Would not the Pope censure such a priest? I think that “liberal” in this context might mean the priest is liberally minded with regard to social-justice issues involving immigrants and the poor.
I agree completely.Sounds good to me.
I like Father Martin. I’m a fan. He’s apparently been appointed to a body that consults on Vatican communications.
Martin is a great communicator. He understands media, and messaging, and how to get the word out there in today’s world. He’s a good writer, a funny guy when he wants to be, and totally serious when he needs to be.
Appointing him to this body is a good call.
Yes. And that Church Militant site is pretty vicious. They seem to have a bit of a bee in their bonnet about gay men. Lots of fulminations and insinuation. And they actually had the nerve to demand that Father Martin tell them whether or not he is himself homosexual. As if it’s any of their business. Or as if it matters, in the case of a celibate man.I find that reports which are unable to use someone’s name without attaching an adjective are rarely worth reading.
Well, Fr. Martin does use the term “liberal” when referring to himself:I find that reports which are unable to use someone’s name without attaching an adjective are rarely worth reading.
Source: thepope.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/the-jewish-people-joseph-ratzinger-and-me/Benedict’s trip has been a surprise for me. To be honest, I was one of those (many) liberal Catholics who was disappointed by his election. (At the time, I told someone that when Pope Benedict XVI first stepped onto the Vatican balcony after his election, I felt like jumping off of one!)
Non-Christian religions are gravely deficient and other denominations do have defects. I’m not sure what he’s even trying to say here. Granted, he did come around and say he was impressed with some of what Pope Benedict was doing, but he couldn’t avoid throwing in those little digs.True, this is the same man who wrote, or at least approved, the Vatican document Dominus Iesus, which said that non-Christian religions are “gravely deficient” and that even other Christian denominations have “defects.” It is also the same man who, after encouraging the celebration of the traditional Latin Mass, rewrote a Latin prayer for the Good Friday services that angered many Jewish people. And I doubt he would change either one of those writings.