J
JPUSC
Guest
Amen!Censure? Are you kidding. Before long he’ll probably be elevated to cardinal.
Amen!Censure? Are you kidding. Before long he’ll probably be elevated to cardinal.
Agreed! I love his writing, both in his books and on his Twitter account.Sounds good to me.
I like Father Martin. I’m a fan. He’s apparently been appointed to a body that consults on Vatican communications.
Martin is a great communicator. He understands media, and messaging, and how to get the word out there in today’s world. He’s a good writer, a funny guy when he wants to be, and totally serious when he needs to be.
Appointing him to this body is a good call.
I found it to be very disturbing ! Nowhere does Fr Martin mention the need for repentence, nowhere are homosexual acts referred to as sinful, and at one point Fr Martin even speaks critically of the catechism.You must read that book. Father Martin gives excellent meditations on the life and teachings of Jesus based on his (Fr. Martin’s) pilgrimage following the footsteps of Jesus in the Holy Land. I have read it twice, once before going on my trip to the Holy Land, and just now finished it for Lent. I also have it on my e-reader. That way I can read parts of it over again whenever I want.Here is a better story. Based on what I’ve seen on facebook, the Church Militant types are losing their minds over this. A gentleman from EWTN was also appointed, I don’t know him and forget his name though.
Father James Martin appointed by Pope Francis to Vatican department for communications
ETA: I initially didn’t bother clicking on the CM link for obvious reasons but I’m glad I did. I somehow missed that he was releasing a book:
Building a Bridge: How the Catholic Church and the LGBT Community Can Enter Into a Relationship of Respect, Compassion and Sensitivity
I’m a bit excited to read that. I have his Jesus, a Pilgrimage book but haven’t read it yet.
I read it and liked it very much.You must read that book. Father Martin gives excellent meditations on the life and teachings of Jesus based on his (Fr. Martin’s) pilgrimage following the footsteps of Jesus in the Holy Land. I have read it twice, once before going on my trip to the Holy Land, and just now finished it for Lent. I also have it on my e-reader. That way I can read parts of it over again whenever I want.
He actually defended capitalism in the book.I read it and liked it very much.
I believe he has a business degeee from the Wharton school of business. I read that recently.He actually defended capitalism in the book.
Nobody’s perfectHe actually defended capitalism in the book.
Nobody’s perfect![]()
In all seriousness I’m excited to read it. My reading has slowed down and I’ve been on a Franciscan kick for a while now. Perhaps it’ll break things up a bit and get my reading back in gear.
Probably true, but I’m more comfortable at the America end of the spectrum, probably because of five years of Jesuit education (and the lifelong influence of a couple of Jesuits in the family).I think that America magazine and Lifesite news are at opposite ends of the Catholic communications spectrum. Doug Mainwaring takes a wary view of Fr. Martin’s appointment here.
Not a very well written article. It basically centers around the “I don’t like him argument” without bring up anything specific about what he has written that is objectionable. My guess is that Doug is pandering to his audience.I think that America magazine and Lifesite news are at opposite ends of the Catholic communications spectrum. Doug Mainwaring takes a wary view of Fr. Martin’s appointment here.
He has been critical of ordinary, orthodox Catholics when it comes to homosexuality. For example, he tweeted:Catholic Culture.org even refers to him as a supporter of Gay Rights and mentions him receiving an award from a pro-homosexual group. I think that says quite alot.
It someone is condemning gays for their propensity, that indeed would be wrong. I have never seem where someone was condemned for their propensity though.He has been critical of ordinary, orthodox Catholics when it comes to homosexuality. For example, he tweeted:
“People who say ‘Love the sinner, hate the sin’ when it comes to being gay, forget that being gay is not a sin.”
With all due respect to him, the tweet is off-base and insulting. He’s suggesting that people who hold this position conflate “the sin” with “being gay”. In all my life, “the sin” has always referred to instances where people turn away from God’s will. That is a tragedy, which we should rightly hate, because we ought to love them and desire their ultimate good. But the tweet suggests that we are already condemning them imply for having a propensity to sin, which is absurd, since we all have various propensities for sin.