B
BayCityRickL
Guest
…thanks … I said that
Both links are the same, they go to the same place. You didn’t try the link really, did you?That link goes to the main Vatican website, in Italian, when I click on it. So did another one you furnished.
From previous remarks I concluded you and others were simply playing Provoke the Protestant until I got mad enough to leave and then you would smirk.
You did. Congratulations. You won.
Then I said to myself, what if Roseeurekacross ISN’T playing a game. How can I give this person the benefit of the doubt, which is what Lund was about, which is what this thread is about. I looked at some of your posts and I note that you have gotten a lot of likes. From some of your posts you seem to be a nice and reasonable person. Grounds for resuming the discussion. Maybe, as they say, we got off to a bad start. Someone who starts a discussion on ecumenism by insulting the Reformation poisoned the discussion. As for anyone who refers to the Reformation as ‘deformation’, they are not interested in a serious discussion. I will probably not respond to them. It’s trolling, real trolling.
I came here for serious discussion. I am not trolling. It is possible you think I am, and it is very true that I think some here are trolling. I am not. Beyond that, either believe me or not. I have chosen to believe that you are not playing games, despite some evidence. And there is the natural suspicion between the Catholics and the Reformed. I expect hostility, and it is possible I saw some where there was none.
Here is an actual, working link to the pope’s homily at Lund http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/new...ion-for-the-500th-anniversary-of-reformation/, I would strongly suggest that when you post a link you make sure it goes where you want it to go.
I commend him for doing this, although it does not seem that guilt or errors or need for forgiveness was admitted on the Catholic side, or any charges made towards the Lutheran side. That’s ok. He went far in doing this, and in saying some nice things about the Reformation, or comparatively nice things. Admirable of him to do this.
Oh, I am using Safari on an iPad and iPhone.Both go to the Vatican homepage in Italian in Chrome when I click on them.
I can think of several reasons this could happen of a technical nature. That’s irrelevant.
I’m thinking this was probably an honest mistake on your part.
So where do you think we should go from here?Personally I feel cheated by protestantism. You kept me from Truth for so long, telling me Truth is historically wrong, making me promises you couldn’t fulfill, opening heaven to shine on my will, taking my soul on a journey of knots, providing me peace while society rots, setting my place at the table of heaven, rested assured that my ego had risen.
How can I celebrate that. If I had to construct a way to approach my old protestant self and have him commune with my now Catholic self, I would be in a position where my old protestant self would try and tell my now Catholic self what is Truth, and my now Catholic self would not say a word, because my old protestant self would not understand.
When I, as a Protestant, started looking into the Catholic I quickly found that a lot of doctrines made sense, when explained from the Catholic point of view. Eventually I got to a point where I had no reasonable objections to Catholicism. But I didn’t exactly want to become a Catholic. It was a big change. It meant leaving behind a very great group of folks at my Protestant church. It meant in some way rejecting the faith of my parents, even if their faith isn’t the strongest. It meant a change in identity.I agree. I used to discuss Christianity with an uncle who is protestant and I always felt drained afterwards because his mind was completely closed; we’d spend hours and he’d agree with the premises but would never draw the correct conclusion. After many wasted hours, I decided to end the dialogue and take up the Rosary. It’s my belief that many protestants have a closed mind when it comes to the Catholic Church and that the only evidence they’ll accept is holiness.
I understand why you say this, but in my opinion there is room for different approaches and reasons for using different approaches. I do think it true that the ‘old’ approach was more I’m right and you are wrong. The new approach is one of seeking commonality. But there is a reason for the old approach.I think the old let’s insult and beat each other back into fellowship approach has utterly failed. Some have not learned this, and I will disregard such people on CAF. Unfortunately there are too many on both sides who just want a bloodletting.
I understand what you mean. In a sense I too feel cheated. But I also think I got many good things from my life as a Protestant. I have no problem being thankful for that. As for the falsehoods I look at it sympathetically. Father forgive them. They know not what they do. I think most were doing what is natural. They were passing on what had been handed to them. Sure they could have been more critical of what they were taught. But there is some virtue in honoring your father.Personally I feel cheated by protestantism. You kept me from Truth for so long, telling me Truth is historically wrong, making me promises you couldn’t fulfill, opening heaven to shine on my will, taking my soul on a journey of knots, providing me peace while society rots, setting my place at the table of heaven, rested assured that my ego had risen.
How can I celebrate that. If I had to construct a way to approach my old protestant self and have him commune with my now Catholic self, I would be in a position where my old protestant self would try and tell my now Catholic self what is Truth, and my now Catholic self would not say a word, because my old protestant self would not understand.