Nonsense. More likely, little Jimmy needs education or he was too small to leave alone with a hammer to begin with.
Lol, as if little Johnny just didn’t understand that he shouldn’t hit his sister in the head with a hammer?
That is fantasy. In the real world little Johnny knows it perfectly well but he is pushing his envelope to see what he can get away with. When Dad pulls his belt out and whack him across his glutes and tells him sternly to never do it again and he is grounded for a week, little Johnny learns that real actions have real consequences. Keeping it all within verbal bounds is like telling stories, playing pretend and make believe.
Second, if the parent behaves angrily (which is only natural since it’s one of the seven deadly sinful tendencies) that teaches the child that “My feelings depend on your behavior.”
So you think ‘righteous anger’ is a sin? So when God gets angry He is sinning too? lol
And, yes, little Johnny should know that the feelings that people have toward him change very suddenly and radically if he does certain things like blowing up a train, or a hitting his sister in the head with a hammer because he thinks its funny, or setting fire to a neighbors house, etc.
You’re darned tootin his actions affect the feelings of everyone around him and to pretend that they do not is hypocrisy.
That’s why “being offended” is such a big industry these days; we’re convinced that we have absolutely no control over our emotions, given certain actions of other. There are huge sums of money at stake, based on us all continuing to buy into that mindset, and for the most part we mostly have.
Nah, that has nothing to do with corporal punishment. In the old days people were innured to little pains and offenses and had much thicker skin. We have all these injured little feelings exactly because these kids don’t know what real pain is.
If a parent says that is very wrong, and if the child is of age to understand and was really being me and was capable of receiving and understand corporal punishment, and if the parent wish to do that, fine. With anger, NO. No way. Unless of course they are neighborhood hoodlums who need to be intimidated, in which case the father has probably done other things wrong, too.
To repress the anger you feel because the child has done something heinous is FAKE, it is pretending to be something (calm) that you are not (outraged that little Johnny did something so intolerable).
If little Johnny keeps pushing the envelope and all you ever do is smile and give him time outs, you will never have little Johnnies respect, which is the FIRST requirement for parenting.
Because the only reason we would be “angry” is if Little Jimmie did it out of meanness and anger. And isn’t it funny that we think the way to handle a person with an anger problem is to get angry back at them? A child get angry and hits his sister. So his parents jump in to correct the problem by “getting angry” themselves and hitting the child with something hopefully other than the hammer. :whacky: It makes me wonder where Little Jimmie got the idea of becoming angry and hitting his sister in the first place? What role model did he take after?
You seriously think that righteous anger in response to an heinous act byh a child ENCOURAGEs the child to do more of the same? lololol
Or you could say, “here see how you like to be hit with a hammer.” Just do it with dignity.
‘Johnny, where is your sister?’
‘In the hospital, dummy, where she needs to be after I hit her with the rake.’
Dad smiles, ‘Well, Johnny, I think we need to have a little talk…’
‘Not now, Dad, I just hit 35th level and it is a really hard one…’
‘Johnny…’
‘Dad shut up already! You’re messing me up!’
For me? It was “the belt.” For my best friend, it was the “cat-o-nine-tails.”
I spanked my daughter maybe 3 times tops, and my son about a dozen. One time I spanked him in anger for something that was extremely wrong and I punished him further. I later took him on a trip and spent some quality time with him after he redressed the problem, and reassured him that I loved him no less.
After he turned 16 I never had an issue with him, and despite his ADD he graduated high school on a low dosage of meds for his ADD, and stopped taking it altogether a year later.
My daughter has turned out well and even my father in law has told me and my wife we have done a great job raisng our kids, and we are both very proud of them.
But the two central axioms we raised them by was 1. as parents our job was to prepare our kids for life, not to make sure they have fun or be their friends. We were not their friends we were their parents/trainers/teachers. 2. We never faked anything with them. If we felt an emotion we expressed it, if we had a thought we told them about it. They never suffered from a lack of praise and love and never were given a shallow faked reaction about anything.
Honesty is crucial in being parents so that the kids have no doubt that mom and dad will do exactly what they say they will and mean what they say when it is said.