M
If you are like me in wondering where the finances of the Vatican City State are derived, where the finances of the Holy See are derived, and whether the Vatican Bank has anything to do either one of them…maybe this link will help.Intersting but the article is short on details as to what would replace it. I am all for more transparency and a crack down on money laundering. We take those things for granted when it comes to banking in the US. But I am not sure I want the Vatican’s resources under the control of a secular banking institute either. IIRC, some of those secular banks in Italy have had their share of scandals too. (out of the frying pan …)
What about a CCU? (Catholic Credit Union)Intersting but the article is short on details as to what would replace it.
The article gives some idea of what it’s about but the fact that the information comes from CNBC gives me pause about some of the facts. Especially when it says things like this:If you are like me in wondering where the finances of the Vatican City State are derived, where the finances of the Holy See are derived, and whether the Vatican Bank has anything to do either one of them…maybe this link will help.
nbcnews.com/business/how-vaticans-finances-work-1C8930020#
Yes, I can understand your skepticism, especially the part about the “Nazis”. If anyone has other sources for understanding the differences between the finances of the Vatican City State, the Holy See, the Vatican Bank, and the CCU I would appreciate it.The article gives some idea of what it’s about but the fact that the information comes from CNBC gives me pause about some of the facts. Especially when it says things like this:
“Where do we begin? It’s been controversial for decades, accused of money-laundering and collaborating with the mafia, and before that with the Nazis.”
Looking forward to signing up for the new CCU…What about a CCU? (Catholic Credit Union)![]()
I instantly got a vision of Pope Francis standing in line to cash his check…thanks for the chuckle.What about a CCU? (Catholic Credit Union)![]()
I can see that vision but I can also see one where he says to charge 0% interest for home ownership!! Perhaps that is why they are considering selling the Vatican Bank!!I instantly got a vision of Pope Francis standing in line to cash his check…thanks for the chuckle.
Very informative. I didn’t realize all that. There are going to be some Vatican officials who have no citizenship other than the Vatican state - banking laws tend to be very tied to citizenship. I can see that there might be an issue if there is no Vatican Bank for them. But that is probably only a handful so I am sure something could be worked out.If you are like me in wondering where the finances of the Vatican City State are derived, where the finances of the Holy See are derived, and whether the Vatican Bank has anything to do either one of them…maybe this link will help.
nbcnews.com/business/how-vaticans-finances-work-1C8930020#
Direct deposit.I instantly got a vision of Pope Francis standing in line to cash his check…thanks for the chuckle.
just tells us that this is rehashed news. You’d have to go back to *The Times *article (and which *The Times *do they mean?) to see if anyone who actually knows is quoted.according to a report by *The Times *in The Australian
I respectfully disagree. It’s not really about the bank, but rather the culture. If the culture of corruption persists, closing the bank would not help. The bank itself as an institution is not intrinsically evil - it’s the people who run the bank who commit the crimes. Even if the Vatican were to close the bank, it would still need to transfer the funds to another bank, not run by the Church. Money laundering is not specific to any bank, so it could conceivably still happen, if the root cause is not addressed.Personally, I would like to see them close the bank.
On posts that reference excuses as to why people leave the faith, I think it’s usually about personal selfishness or because parents leveled off or quit the practice of the Faith.Personally, I would like to see them close the bank.
So many of our fallen-away Catholic brothers and sisters complain about the money issues of the Church as there reason for leaving. They seem to have a complete misunderstanding of where their local diocese and parish money comes from. They like to complain that their Church is always asking for money, and they ask (amazingly!) why the Vatican doesn’t sell some of their riches to fund their Church or just send a check!
Having a bank just fuels these erroneous thoughts…
That same logic ought to apply to the UN and every nation.I respectfully disagree. It’s not really about the bank, but rather the culture. If the culture of corruption persists, closing the bank would not help. The bank itself as an institution is not intrinsically evil - it’s the people who run the bank who commit the crimes. Even if the Vatican were to close the bank, it would still need to transfer the funds to another bank, not run by the Church. Money laundering is not specific to any bank, so it could conceivably still happen, if the root cause is not addressed.
That said, the closing of the bank as a symbolic gesture would certainly create good PR. But like I said, the root cause still needs to be addressed.
Not necessarily. There are national and international laws that regulate and monitor this type of activity. If the funds were held in another bank or banks (major international banks, we could assume) the bank would be responsible for monitoring the activities of the accounts to insure that no money laundering or other prohibited activities would occur. At the same time, I would hope the Vatican would put trustworthy people in charge of managing those accounts, and arrange for propering auditing and controls.It’s not really about the bank, but rather the culture. If the culture of corruption persists, closing the bank would not help. The bank itself as an institution is not intrinsically evil - it’s the people who run the bank who commit the crimes. Even if the Vatican were to close the bank, it would still need to transfer the funds to another bank, not run by the Church. Money laundering is not specific to any bank, so it could conceivably still happen, if the root cause is not addressed.
Yes and yes. And more than symbolic, it would clear the air for many who wonder what the Vatican (or its bank) is doing running a financial institution, and why they have taken so long to comply with the rules that other banks have to follow.That said, the closing of the bank as a symbolic gesture would certainly create good PR. But like I said, the root cause still needs to be addressed.