Many Muslim countries are already overflowing with refugees.
Others definitely do not need money to be able to support refugees - they choose not to.
What are Europeans supposed to do - ship them to a country that will just send them back to Syria?
Maybe if the USA took it’s fair share of refugees, it would be easier for Europe to manage. Especially considering the USA is at least in part responsible for the situation.
America is not responsible for Islamism.
Mohammed is. Fanaticism and resentments and tribalism all play the role.
But America is not responsible, and neither is Europe. The Syrians are responsible for their own country.
Recognizing that fact would be a good start. Proper vetting would be a second.
And giving the countries already overwhelmed by refugees some resources from the outside would be the third. Heck, even recognizing that a preponderance of the asylum seekers were young single men might have been put to good use for Europe to use as the boots on the ground against ISIS and/or Assad. Give them a gun and a little training and send them back to win their country back from the bad guys, whosoever they may define them to be.
Why not send them back and treat only the women and children and Christians as refugees?
It is their fight, not America’s and not Europe’s.
Finally, recognizing that our good intentions are the solution to Islamism would be an important insight to have too. As much as we may empathize with people with cancer, it is never a good idea to transplant the cancer into our own bodies as if that is going to cure anything.
Lord, save us from the good.