It is a sad state of affairs when the likes of Lady Gaga are an influence of any kind. And these people vote.Who in the world is “Lady Gaga” and why should anybody listen to her opinion?
Isn’t she a pop singer? People actually care about the political opinions of pop stars?
What next, Britney for president?![]()
To be counted among the 50, a person must “have world-changing potential.” The person doesn’t have to be in the world of politics.Who in the world is “Lady Gaga” and why should anybody listen to her opinion?
Isn’t she a pop singer? People actually care about the political opinions of pop stars?
He had to do something to rise in the ratings. I’m sorry the article didn’t explain how. He certainly deserves to be that high, and I can see why the five above him deserved to be one through five.Here is the actual article with the rankings:
newstatesman.com/2010/09/global-influence-world-2
I find it interesting that the Pope was rated #6 this year, but only #26 last year. What did he do to in the past 12 months to make him so much more world changing?
I’d prefer the Pope be thought of as the “World’s Conscience.”To be counted among the 50, a person must “have world-changing potential.” The person doesn’t have to be in the world of politics.
Besides, if it were about politics, the Pope shouldn’t be on that list. He’s not just another European politician.