Pope names first Catholic bishop to oversee Anglican ordinariate [CNA]

  • Thread starter Thread starter CNA_News
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CNA_News

Guest
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/i...er_in_the_United_States_and_Canada.jpgVatican City, Nov 24, 2015 / 07:56 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Pope Francis has appointed Msgr. Steven Lopes, a Catholic priest from California, as the new bishop who will head the Anglican Ordinariate in the United States and Canada, making him the first Catholic prelate to hold the position.
Code:
Bishop-elect Lopes, 40, is originally from the Archdiocese of San Francisco in the United States, and currently serves as an official for the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith.

He will be taking over for Msgr. Jeffrey N. Steenson, a former Episcopal bishop appointed by Benedict XVI in 2012 to shepherd the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter.

The Ordinariate is equivalent to a diocese for Roman Catholics who were nurtured in the Anglican tradition, and was officially established by the Vatican Jan. 1, 2012.

Ordinariates are similar to dioceses but typically national in scope. Pope Benedict authorized the creation of ordinariates for Anglican communities seeking to enter the Catholic Church in his 2009 apostolic constitution, “Anglicanorum coetibus.”

Members of the Ordinariate are fully Roman Catholic, while retaining elements of Anglican heritage in their celebration of liturgy and in the hospitality and ministries of their Catholic communities.

Based in Houston, Texas, the Ordinariate has more than 40 Roman Catholic parishes and communities across the United States and Canada.

A married Anglican priest can be ordained a Catholic priest but not a bishop. Instead, as in the case of Msgr. Steenson, they become an “ordinary,” who carries all the authority of a bishop except that of being able to ordain priests.

Msgr. Lopes’ appointment, then, marks the first time a Roman Catholic bishop has been named for any of the worlds’ three Personal Ordinariates: Our Lady of Walsingham in the United Kingdom; the Chair of Saint Peter in the United States and Canada and Our Lady of the Southern Cross in Australia.

The announcement that bishop-elect Lopes will be taking over for the retiring Msgr. Steenson came in a Nov. 24 communique from the Vatican.

Born and raised in Fremont, Calif., Msgr. Lopes attended Catholic schools throughout his childhood, as well as the St. Ignatius Institute at the University of San Francisco.

He entered seminary in the Archdiocese of San Francisco. He studied theology at St. Patrick’s Seminary in Menlo Park, Calif. and later in Rome, at the Pontifical North American College.

After being ordained a priest June 23, 2001, and serving in various pastoral assignments Msgr. Lopes went on to obtain both licentiate and doctoral degrees in Sacred Theology from the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome.

Since Sept. 1, 2005, the bishop-elect has served as an official of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and has also taught theology at the Gregorian University. He was named a monsignor in 2010.

Msgr. Lopes’ ordination to the episcopate is scheduled to take place Feb. 2, 2016, in Houston.

Though Msgr. Steenson’s retirement is effective immediately, he will serve as the Ordinariate’s administrator until Lopes officially takes canonical possession in February.

A Nov. 24 press release from the Ordinariate explained that with bishop-elect Lopes’ appointment, Pope Francis “affirms and amplifies Pope Benedict’s vision for Christian unity, in which diverse expressions of one faith are joined together in the Church.”

“By naming Bishop-elect Lopes, the Pope has confirmed that the Ordinariate is a permanent, enduring part of the Catholic Church, like any other diocese – one that is now given a bishop so that it may deepen its contribution to the life of the Church and the world.”

The press released also noted that Msgr. Lopes’ appointment falls just five days before the Ordinariate will begin using a new  book of liturgical texts titled “Divine Worship: The Missal,” which will be used for the celebration of Mass in personal ordinariates throughout the world.

The texts in the missal have been approved by the Vatican and will be used for the first time Nov. 20, 2015, the First Sunday of Advent.

Msgr. Lopes was deeply involved in developing the text, and since 2011 has served as the executive coordinator of the Vatican commission “Anglicanae Traditiones,” which produced the new texts.

In the press release, the Ordinariate called the new missal as “a milestone,” and praised both Benedict XVI’s vision for unity as well as how Pope Francis is concretely implementing it.

Both of these together “demonstrate that unity in faith allows for a vibrant diversity in the expression of that faith. The Ordinariate is a key ecumenical venture for the Catholic Church and a concrete example of this unity in diversity.”

The new bishop-elect will be introduced by Msgr. Steenson at a live news conference in Houston at 10:30a.m. local time inside the Chancery Offices of the Ordinariate.

After celebrating the Mass on the first Sunday of Advent in Houston with the new missal, Msgr. Lopes will return to Rome to finish to finish his work at the Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith. He will then then return to Texas at the end of the calendar year.
feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/catholicnewsagency/dailynews?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/catholicnewsagency/dailynews/~4/yWmuuW88HBY

Full article…
 
Pope Francis has appointed Msgr. Steven Lopes, a Catholic priest from California, as the new bishop who will head the Anglican Ordinariate in the United States and Canada, making him the first Catholic prelate to hold the position.
Cool! I’ve been studying the relationship between Catholicism and Anglicanism recently, especially some early efforts toward restoring unity and some early Catholic missionaries in Anglican territory. I’d like to attend Mass at one of these “Anglican Use” parishes sometime. 🙂
 
Interesting news. Has Monsignor Steenson already reached retirement age? Interesting that the new bishop has been chosen from the existing ranks of Latin Catholic priests and not from the Ordinariate ranks. Perhaps there were no suitable celibate candidates and there was a strong desire for a bishop rather than another presbyter as Ordinary?
It was also my understanding that the Ordinariate governance councils would elect a candidate for Ordinary subject to Roman confirmation. Was this process followed?
 
Interesting news. Has Monsignor Steenson already reached retirement age? Interesting that the new bishop has been chosen from the existing ranks of Latin Catholic priests and not from the Ordinariate ranks. Perhaps there were no suitable celibate candidates and there was a strong desire for a bishop rather than another presbyter as Ordinary?
It was also my understanding that the Ordinariate governance councils would elect a candidate for Ordinary subject to Roman confirmation. Was this process followed?
Monsignor Steenson is married and thus cannot be a Bishop. Never seen a breakdown of the Ordinariate of how many of their Priests aren’t married.

I assume Bishop elect Lopes’ involvement in the Ordinariate is why he was given the position. And having a Latin Rite Bishop really shows the Ordinariate’s integration into the Church, and that it’s not just a side project or something.
 
Monsignor Steenson is married and thus cannot be a Bishop. Never seen a breakdown of the Ordinariate of how many of their Priests aren’t married.

I assume Bishop elect Lopes’ involvement in the Ordinariate is why he was given the position. And having a Latin Rite Bishop really shows the Ordinariate’s integration into the Church, and that it’s not just a side project or something.
Makes me wonder though how long the ordinate will remain as it is as a separate but partially integrated body. I mean with a Latin Rite Bishop in charge and the flow of folks across the Tiber having slowed does the ordinate have a long term future or will they eventually just be completely folded into the main body of the Catholic Church eventually?
 
Makes me wonder though how long the ordinate will remain as it is as a separate but partially integrated body. I mean with a Latin Rite Bishop in charge and the flow of folks across the Tiber having slowed does the ordinate have a long term future or will they eventually just be completely folded into the main body of the Catholic Church eventually?
I hope they maintain the use of the Anglican-based liturgies. It is my understanding that the Anglican Use brought with it several variations of Anglican liturgies, which were then modified to make them more Catholic. I’d like to see them kept around.
 
I hope they maintain the use of the Anglican-based liturgies. It is my understanding that the Anglican Use brought with it several variations of Anglican liturgies, which were then modified to make them more Catholic. I’d like to see them kept around.
What are the “Anglican use liturgies”? Are they similar to Anglican worship?
 
What are the “Anglican use liturgies”? Are they similar to Anglican worship?
I think they similar to whatever they use on Sunday mornings in England, except modified for Catholic use. I used the plural because I’m confident that Anglican churches and their Anglican Use counterparts have more than one option for liturgy.
 
I think they similar to whatever they use on Sunday mornings in England, except modified for Catholic use. I used the plural because I’m confident that Anglican churches and their Anglican Use counterparts have more than one option for liturgy.
Well, I was just curious about what it is like. 🙂

P.S. If only they used a Sarum Rite instead…
 
I think they similar to whatever they use on Sunday mornings in England, except modified for Catholic use. I used the plural because I’m confident that Anglican churches and their Anglican Use counterparts have more than one option for liturgy.
The Anglican Use Liturgy is celebrated according to the Book of Divine Worship (BDW). The BDW was a creation of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith working with those who had come over from the Episcopal Church in the United States in the 1980s. It was based on the 1979 Book of Common Prayer (BCP), preserving many elements in the BCP, some of which went back to the BCP of 1928 and of 1662. Retained in the Mass are, for example, the Collect for Purity, the Prayer of Humble Access, the confession, bidding prayers and so forth. Unlike, for example the 1928 BCP, the BDW ordered the elements to normally reflect the order within the Roman missal, as for example, the placement of the Kyrie and the Gloria – but the confession of sin and the exchange of peace was placed before the offertory.

The BDW supplied other elements, such as what Romans know as the Roman Canon, rendering it into Elizabethan English. Originally, there was a Rite I and a Rite II, corresponding to Elizabethan English and contemporary English. Rite II in the BDW has been eliminated in subsequent revision.

The BDW also provides the rites for baptism, marriage, burial of the dead, the Daily Office, and so forth and the rites are reflective of Anglican patrimony.

A new edition of the BDW goes into effect in the Ordinariates this coming Sunday, actually and has made further revisions and changes from those of a few years ago.

Mass celebrated according to the BDW, as it has been before revision, can be seen via the Parish of Our Lady of the Atonement, which was the first Anglican Use Pastoral Provision created in 1983 at youtube.com/watch?v=Q251EywW__M
 
I think Bishop-elect Lopes will be a great blessing for the Ordinariate in the United States and Canada – and, indeed, globally. He has done remarkable work across his years at the CDF on behalf of this initiative.
 
I thought I saw one or two on youtube. And in Latin too. 😉
Priests of the pastoral provision do, on occasions, celebrate Mass in Latin just as other priests may. The liturgy of the Book of Divine Worship, as such, is not a Latin language liturgy though since it is drawn from the Book of Common Prayer.
 
Priests of the pastoral provision do, on occasions, celebrate Mass in Latin just as other priests may. The liturgy of the Book of Divine Worship, as such, is not a Latin language liturgy though since it is drawn from the Book of Common Prayer.
I have heard also that, in addition to the liturgy, the people and congregations brought with them our great Anglican musical heritage. And things like Evensong. The best of both worlds!
 
Monsignor Steenson is married and thus cannot be a Bishop. Never seen a breakdown of the Ordinariate of how many of their Priests aren’t married.

I assume Bishop elect Lopes’ involvement in the Ordinariate is why he was given the position. And having a Latin Rite Bishop really shows the Ordinariate’s integration into the Church, and that it’s not just a side project or something.
I understand this; however, that didn’t stop Pope Benedict from naming three married presbyters to serve as Ordinaries of the three Ordinariates. I am curious as to why the good Monsignor is stepping down so early in his ministry at such a young age (by clerical standards). Of course the appointment of a bishop is wonderful news…I am just curious. Will the Ordinaries of the UK and Australia also be stepping down to be replaced by bishops?
 
The Anglican Use Liturgy is celebrated according to the Book of Divine Worship (BDW). The BDW was a creation of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith working with those who had come over from the Episcopal Church in the United States in the 1980s. It was based on the 1979 Book of Common Prayer (BCP), preserving many elements in the BCP, some of which went back to the BCP of 1928 and of 1662. Retained in the Mass are, for example, the Collect for Purity, the Prayer of Humble Access, the confession, bidding prayers and so forth. Unlike, for example the 1928 BCP, the BDW ordered the elements to normally reflect the order within the Roman missal, as for example, the placement of the Kyrie and the Gloria – but the confession of sin and the exchange of peace was placed before the offertory.

The BDW supplied other elements, such as what Romans know as the Roman Canon, rendering it into Elizabethan English. Originally, there was a Rite I and a Rite II, corresponding to Elizabethan English and contemporary English. Rite II in the BDW has been eliminated in subsequent revision.

The BDW also provides the rites for baptism, marriage, burial of the dead, the Daily Office, and so forth and the rites are reflective of Anglican patrimony.

A new edition of the BDW goes into effect in the Ordinariates this coming Sunday, actually and has made further revisions and changes from those of a few years ago.

Mass celebrated according to the BDW, as it has been before revision, can be seen via the Parish of Our Lady of the Atonement, which was the first Anglican Use Pastoral Provision created in 1983 at youtube.com/watch?v=Q251EywW__M
Interesting, so the Ordinate (Anglican) use with the Book of Divine Worship only uses an analogue to the Anglican/Episcopal Rite I service in the Elizabethan English? No analogue to the contemporary English Rite II any longer?
 
I understand this; however, that didn’t stop Pope Benedict from naming three married presbyters to serve as Ordinaries of the three Ordinariates. I am curious as to why the good Monsignor is stepping down so early in his ministry at such a young age (by clerical standards). Of course the appointment of a bishop is wonderful news…I am just curious. Will the Ordinaries of the UK and Australia also be stepping down to be replaced by bishops?
Perhaps the election of presbyters was always seen as temporary, a stopgap measure to serve the fledgling movement until it could grow to the proper maturity. I am sure that in a generation or two, the Ordinariates will be populated not by converts but by Cradle Ordinarians. I presume that non-convert priests will be observing the discipline of celibacy and therefore eligible for election as bishop.

Monsignor Steenson’s comments seemed to indicate that the Ordinariate was mature enough to be in need of a true bishop already, and he seemed prepared and willing to accept that it happened sooner rather than later. It’s a gracious move on his part. I am sure that he will have a fruitful future career, even if it isn’t quite so visible or prestigious as what he’s leaving behind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top