G
graciew
Guest
Confession,Reconciliation. Go to our priests.
St John Vianney,Cura de Ars,please pray for us all and thank you in advance!
St John Vianney,Cura de Ars,please pray for us all and thank you in advance!
So I’m still unclear and have the same questions as Paganus. If one went to confession and had what he/she thought was a valid confession prior to the year of mercy’s grant to priests to absolve this sin and the priest absolved him/her of the sin of abortion, is the confessor still in the state of mortal sin if the priest did not have this special grant to absolve this sin? What if the priest was unaware of this special grant? How would that make the person confessing still guilty if one thought one were forgiven if the person confessing knew nothing of the Canon law?You’re talking about a priest who knew he was unable to lift the sanction and absolve, but deliberately deceived penitent(s) and said the prayers of absolution anyway?
Because it’s done anonymously. A confessor would contact his ordinary and assert only that there is a penitent who appears to have incurred excommunication. The confessor would request delegation to lift the sanction and absolve, and the ordinary would grant it. No confidentiality would be breached.
Only when it’s misunderstood…![]()
First, to clarify your terminology:So I’m still unclear and have the same questions as Paganus. If one went to confession and had what he/she thought was a valid confession prior to the year of mercy’s grant to priests to absolve this sin and the priest absolved him/her of the sin of abortion, is the confessor still in the state of mortal sin if the priest did not have this special grant to absolve this sin? What if the priest was unaware of this special grant? How would that make the person confessing still guilty if one thought one were forgiven if the person confessing knew nothing of the Canon law?
I’m not sure that’s the biggest one, but it is one.Here in lies what might be the biggest, most common, and arguably the most dangerous misconception on abortion and automatic excommunication.
I’m sorry, I may not be all that bright when it comes to this type of stuff and although I guess I’m trying to get a yes or no answer, it’s probably not that easy. When you say “many of us” are you referring to we the penitents or we the confessors? And if it is we the penitents, how do we possess the faculties to un-excommunicate ourselves? What are these faculties?First, to clarify your terminology:
confessor = priest hearing confession
penitent = person who is confessing
Second: many of us have already the faculty to lift this excommunication, by virtue of the grant of faculties we already possess. I know, for example, the faculties that I possess by grant of the law itself by virtue of my canonical appointments as well as special concessions by my bishop.
This issue actually impinges several issues; the easiest way to resolve your concern is that if the confessor acted, you should presume that he knows what he is doing rather than presume that he does not.
Our faculties are granted both by law and by decree of the bishop…but the decree is not public. Each priest would know what was contained in the grant he received.
If you received absolution, you’re good to go.So I’m still unclear and have the same questions as Paganus. If one went to confession and had what he/she thought was a valid confession prior to the year of mercy’s grant to priests to absolve this sin and the priest absolved him/her of the sin of abortion, is the confessor still in the state of mortal sin if the priest did not have this special grant to absolve this sin?
As the venerable don says: priests know what faculties have been given to them.What if the priest was unaware of this special grant? How would that make the person confessing still guilty if one thought one were forgiven if the person confessing knew nothing of the Canon law?