Pope reacts to 'rigid' critics [CWN]

  • Thread starter Thread starter CWN_News
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
With respect to Amoris Laetitia, here is yet another analysis, in so far as AL attempts to resolve moral dilemmas by considering which is the lesser of two evils:

Does Amoris Laetita Resolve Genuine Moral Dilemmas?
Sorry, the link wasn’t working for me. :o
 
MODERATOR REMINDER

Negative and rude comments toward CAF members, clergy (deacons, priests and bishops) or toward religious and religious orders are banned.

Everyone, online and offline, deserves to be spoken to and about respectfully. However, some posters seem to feel that clergy and religious are fair game.

If you have an issue with them, take it up in private, not on this forum or any of our forums.

You may cite something from another source, if you are not using it to further an agenda. Agenda posting is not allowed.

If we deem that you are disrespectful to our clergy and religious, you will receive an infraction or even a ban.

Proof what you write before you post.

You may not make disparaging remarks about:
  • Vatican II
  • Clergy (deacons, priests and bishops) of any group
  • Religious (brothers, sisters, and nuns) of any order or congregation
  • Lawful actions and disciiplines by the Church including the historical excommunication of the SSPX. It happened. Rome explained why it happened. End of story. Rome did not put it out there for debate by the faithful.
  • Another poster or his/her ideas. You can disagree. You cannot attack,insult, ridicule or dismiss as unimportant. His opinion is as important to him as your opinion is to you.
  • Parishes, pastors, civil leaders.
  • Other religions – if you’re unsure how to speak in public about other faiths, look at the Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI and Pope Francis. They are fraternal, polite, and intellectual in discussing religious differences.
Avoid arguments that will lead to violations of charity. You don’t have to like what you read and others do not have to like what you post. But you must be civil toward each other and those who are not on the forum.

As Fr. Grondin said in a recent post, “Sometimes we can think that we know more than we do and that leads us to make assumptions which could be incorrect. While having questions and seeking answers, we still need to trust that the Holy Spirit is who is guiding the Church. Put your mind at ease and trust in God to guide His Church.”
 
Pope Francis issued a church document (doctrine?), these 4 Cardinals are questioning his teachings as being immoral. I see that as going against the Pope. I take it you don’t. To each their own I guesss. 🤷
Here is a quote from Bishop Athanasius Schneider:

"The Four Cardinals with their prophetic voice demanding doctrinal and pastoral clarity have a great merit before their own conscience, before history, and before the innumerable simple faithful Catholics of our days, who are driven to the ecclesiastical periphery, because of their fidelity to Christ’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage"
 
Here is a quote from Bishop Athanasius Schneider:

"The Four Cardinals with their prophetic voice demanding doctrinal and pastoral clarity have a great merit before their own conscience, before history, and before the innumerable simple faithful Catholics of our days, who are driven to the ecclesiastical periphery, because of their fidelity to Christ’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage"
I’m not surprised to see this, but I’m still with the Pope here. :yup:
 
I don’t think you need to be a subject matter expert to see problems with the way this was approached. The questions themselves are completely reasonable. However the letter doesn’t ask just ask the questions straight up.

If your kid asks, “Are you saying I am allowed to borrow the car?” That is respectful, and should be answered. If he gathers his siblings around as an audience and asks, “when you said that I could at some point drive to the store, were you in fact saying that Mom, who once said I am not allowed to drive her car was wrong, and that my brothers and i no longer need to regard her instructions as binding?” that would be highly disrespectful and merit a a rebuke rather than an answer.
 
With respect to Amoris Laetitia, here is yet another analysis, in so far as AL attempts to resolve moral dilemmas by considering which is the lesser of two evils:

crisismagazine.com/2016/moral-dilemmas-justify-amoris-laetitia
Interesting article. I agree with its author that there are no circumstances in which adultery is the right choice. A ‘lesser evil’ remains plainly and simply an evil.

This is not to say the author’s analysis of AL is correct. I don’t know. It is complex.
 
No, these are that poster’s personal interpretation of the document.
 
We should wait to publicly discuss this when this whole “fiasco” is settled. Not before.
Will you please clarify two things?

First, it has been reported that Pope Francis will not respond to the various requests for clarity from the media, prelates and theologians around the world, including the plea from Cardinal Burke et al. (which is why it finally went public). So, what are you saying we should wait for to settle the matter?

Second, somewhere above you said, "We need not discuss this at all, especially considering we haven’t even received the official document publicly. What official document?
 
Will you please clarify two things?

First, it has been reported that Pope Francis will not respond to the various requests for clarity from the media, prelates and theologians around the world, including the plea from Cardinal Burke et al. (which is why it finally went public). So, what are you saying we should wait for to settle the matter?

Second, somewhere above you said, "We need not discuss this at all, especially considering we haven’t even received the official document publicly. What official document?
  1. Well it has been settled now. They are “out of office” so to speak.
  2. Has the laity received a copy of AL? I thought not, but maybe I am wrong on that.
 
I don’t think you need to be a subject matter expert to see problems with the way this was approached. The questions themselves are completely reasonable. However the letter doesn’t ask just ask the questions straight up.

If your kid asks, “Are you saying I am allowed to borrow the car?” That is respectful, and should be answered. If he gathers his siblings around as an audience and asks, “when you said that I could at some point drive to the store, were you in fact saying that Mom, who once said I am not allowed to drive her car was wrong, and that my brothers and i no longer need to regard her instructions as binding?” that would be highly disrespectful and merit a a rebuke rather than an answer.
I think you missed a point here. They sent the letter to the Pope, first in private without answer for months. Since the Pope refused to answer them in private, well sir they went public. What else can they do?

But to no avail, the Pope still refuses to answer them.
 
  1. Well it has been settled now. They are “out of office” so to speak.
  2. Has the laity received a copy of AL? I thought not, but maybe I am wrong on that.
Oh my goodness. He is still a Cardinal.

Let’s see, Cardinals asks questions: Cardinal gets called a “Witless Worm”, then called a “Legalist”, then kicked out of office: And that somehow settles all the questions???
:eek:

And AL Has been available on the vatican website for a long time now.
 
I don’t know, I would have to read it in context within the actual document Amoris laetitia before making my judgment.

And even if it was worst case scenario, I would stay with the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, she has been through rough times before I believe. There is no where else I could go.

I’ll pray for our Holy Father.

I hope this has helped

God Bless You

Thank you for reading
Josh
 
Oh my goodness. He is still a Cardinal.

Let’s see, Cardinals asks questions: Cardinal gets called a “Witless Worm”, then called a “Legalist”, then kicked out of office: And that somehow settles all the questions???
:eek:

And AL Has been available on the vatican website for a long time now.
Okay. I’m confused as to what “removed from the congregation of Divine Liturgy” entails then.

OK then so why all the fuss just NOW??? Why not fuss about it a few years ago? 🤷
 
No it’s not just personal opinion - look at the link I provided The other poster.
Hi Chipper

Is there a link you could provide us please to the Vatican website or something that contains the full text of Amoris laetitia?

Thank you Chipper.

God Bless You

Thank you for reading
Josh
 
It has shattered me too. But remember, these guys are still humans. We still have the church - “The church is the pillar and foundation of truth” - Thessolonians. It doesn’t say that the Pope is the pillar and foundation of truth. St. Peter made big mistakes too. St Paul corrected him to “his face”.

The church is not composed of just one guy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top