To suggest that a Catholic is not bound by the Church’s teaching because he can’t understand or simply rejects the reasons put forward to support such norms is simply to undo what Saint Paul refers to as the obedience of faith.
I think it’s the sound bite title, I didn’t find the content that bad to be honest, I thought it was pretty good, namely this bit -There are bound to be plenty of good, hardworking priests in the Church whose eyes roll in their sockets whenever Pope Francis speaks like this. I don’t understand the need for such rhetoric. Using these standards, one could consider Pope Pius XII a “clericalist” for his work prior to being pope.
I found it good, because it mentions our Holy Father’s interpretation of the word ‘clerical’ or ‘clericalist’, as that of looking down on their subjects. If our Holy Father didn’t specify what he meant by ‘clerical’ or ‘clericalist’ I too would have agreed with you.Jesus taught with real authority, the Pope said, because He taught with humility. “He had an attitude of a servant, and this gave authority.” The Pharisees, on the other hand, “had a psychology of princes.” Jesus was close to the people, and showed his care from them, while the Pharisees “despised the poor people, the ignorant.”
I have encountered such priests, and a deacon like that, both hispanic.The pope talks about this a lot. I have concluded this is a significant problem in Argentina, certainly more so than in the USA, explaining his focus.
In all my life in the 10s of parishes I have attended, I have never encountered a priest like this…