Pope says no religion immune from fundamentalism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tbrightson
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And yet you cant show proof of them. Where are the news stories? Where those who did it punished?
We’ve given proof. You haven’t denied that our examples were not true. If you are looking for those types of atrocities being committed today by Christians, there aren’t any. Why are you ignoring the past and not believing that history can repeat itself?
 
Philipl, That Christians are not commiting those types of crimes today does not mean that it cannot happen tomorrow. It has happened in the past, and as JhareekCarnelian has pointed out, it has happened more recently (less than 100 years). My bet is that it will happen again.
Wow, now its ok the say fundamentalist Muslims atrocities happening today are just as bad as fundamentalist Christian atrocities that will happen some time in the future? Should I go to confession now or after it happens?
 
Wow, now its ok the say fundamentalist Muslims atrocities happening today are just as bad as fundamentalist Christian atrocities that will happen some time in the future? Should I go to confession now or after it happens?
Of course any such acts are bad no matter who does them. Your basically saying that it’s ok for Christians to commit the same atrocities that ISIS is committing right now but it’s not as bad somehow? Your should go to confession right now for your vile thoughts.
 
But when my head is chopped off, after about three days I will start to smell bad, but if someone calls me a name, three days later I just may feel bad…
So you die and you pain ends. But if you don’t die, your anger, frustration, and ill will spreads through every relationship you form, and it poisons society.
Sounds pretty bad to me.
 
Might be useful to post the Pope’s thoughts in context again before they continue to be taken out of context (that’s what fundamentalism does)
“No religion is immune from its own fundamentalisms. In any confession there will be a small group of fundamentalists, whose work is to destroy in the interests of an idea, not of a reality. Reality is superior to an idea. God, whether in Judaism, in Christianity, or in Islam, in the faith of those three peoples, accompanies God’s people with His presence. In the Bible we see it, Muslims in the Koran. Our God is a God of nearness, which accompanies. Fundamentalists push God away from the companionship of His people; they dis-Incarnate Him, they transform Him into an ideology. Therefore, in the name of this ideological God, they kill, attack, destroy, and calumniate. Practically, they transform this God into a Baal, into an idol,” Pope Francis said.
The Pope is not appealing to specific instances or shining the light of judgement on specific peoples in specific incidents. He says what he says. The stock fundamentalist approach is to take an exhortation, or scripture passage, or Church teaching, and assail it with impossible and tangential questions of proof, which don’t really address the heart of the message but deflect away from it.
 
Christians who refer to other Christians and their fellow man as ‘heretics’ are no different from those who regard their fellow man as ‘infidels’ as a reason for their violent behaviour. And I’ve seen Catholics even on this board refer to others as heretics and their posts as heresies.
That is a bit much. The difference is that the Christians doing that aren’t murdering entire villages or blowing stuff up. And, you know, there is heresy out there and it isn’t necessarily a bsd thing to point it out when necessary.
 
I was just going to bring up this thread I was involved in from an Orthodox forum I visit occasionally, where you can plainly see the effects these crimes have on certain Orthodox Christians’ views of Catholicism today.
orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php/topic,64569.0.html
Some of the claims get a bit extreme and ridiculous, particularly the ones that the whole thing was happening with Vatican approval and that and that the Vatican would do the same thing today if it could, but is a reminder that every religion has had its failing.
 
I was just going to bring up this thread I was involved in from an Orthodox forum I visit occasionally, where you can plainly see the effects these crimes have on certain Orthodox Christians’ views of Catholicism today.
orthodoxchristianity.net/forum/index.php/topic,64569.0.html
Some of the claims get a bit extreme and ridiculous, particularly the ones that the whole thing was happening with Vatican approval and that and that the Vatican would do the same thing today if it could, but is a reminder that every religion has had its failing.
Man…to read about something, but to actually see pictures…very saddening to see people suffer like that.
 
That is a bit much. The difference is that the Christians doing that aren’t murdering entire villages or blowing stuff up. And, you know, there is heresy out there and it isn’t necessarily a bsd thing to point it out when necessary.
But the problem is that people throw around words like “heretic” and “heresy” just because they disagree, not because it is true.
Slandering other people does blow up the boards, it blows up people’s hearts, and it places people in the position of feeling themselves superior. Hardly a Christian virtue.

As I stated before, killing of the human spirit can take many forms. The literal loss of life is quick and to the point, yes. But the other ways of killing thought, and forcing others to one way is every bit as reckless and dangerous.
It’s the basis for cult activity, frankly. Hound the vulnerable into submission. That’s not what the Gospel message is. Preach the truth, and if they are still uninterested? Walk away. Leave in peace.
 
As I stated before, killing of the human spirit can take many forms. The literal loss of life is quick and to the point, yes. But the other ways of killing thought, and forcing others to one way is every bit as reckless and dangerous.
It’s the basis for cult activity, frankly. Hound the vulnerable into submission. That’s not what the Gospel message is. Preach the truth, and if they are still uninterested? Walk away. Leave in peace.
Exactly and one of the markers of fundamentalism that Pope Francis mentioned in his list was to ‘calumniate’ … and to condemn others of heresy when not even the hierarchy of the Church uses such a condemnation… is as calumnious as it comes. 👍
 
But the problem is that people throw around words like “heretic” and “heresy” just because they disagree, not because it is true.
Slandering other people does blow up the boards, it blows up people’s hearts, and it places people in the position of feeling themselves superior. Hardly a Christian virtue.

As I stated before, killing of the human spirit can take many forms. The literal loss of life is quick and to the point, yes. ***But the other ways of killing thought, and forcing others to one way is every bit as reckless and dangerous. ***
It’s the basis for cult activity, frankly. Hound the vulnerable into submission. That’s not what the Gospel message is. Preach the truth, and if they are still uninterested? Walk away. Leave in peace.
Not to mention that the thread is about Christian fundamentalism being present in every Church-- it is a mistake to let the thread be reduced to whether or not Christians are killing people over it.

In response to the part of your post I highlighted. Perhaps the greatest damage that fundamentalism does is that it excludes the Holy Spirit from having its due influence in the minds of people-- it is a form of thought policing. It is rigid and exclusive and separates from God. Fundamentalism seeks security in the world of ideas instead of in God. Fundamentalism is a form of control where the fundamentalist him or herself is exercising a harmful control of thought and action upon the self. This control always finds expression in being abusive and uncharitable towards others in the name of God and truth.

The blindness of the fundamentalist is to strain out a gnat and swallow a camel. They seem particularly attuned to the slightest (even unintentional) word or idea that is even subtly unorthodox and jump at the opportunity to correct, judge and teach all the while being blind to charity, context and the intentions of those that *need correcting/I

We all have to be very careful not to let it creep into our hearts and minds because it exists in most of us (certainly me) on a spectrum from murder to very subtle character assassination and closed mindedness. The Pope is just trying to point this out to us so we can not be stumbling blocks to those who would enter into heaven and make sure we are not working for the devil while preaching Christ.*
 
Not to mention that the thread is about Christian fundamentalism being present in every Church-- it is a mistake to let the thread be reduced to whether or not Christians are killing people over it.

In response to the part of your post I highlighted. Perhaps the greatest damage that fundamentalism does is that it excludes the Holy Spirit from having its due influence in the minds of people-- it is a form of thought policing. It is rigid and exclusive and separates from God. Fundamentalism seeks security in the world of ideas instead of in God. Fundamentalism is a form of control where the fundamentalist him or herself is exercising a harmful control of thought and action upon the self. This control always finds expression in being abusive and uncharitable towards others in the name of God and truth.

The blindness of the fundamentalist is to strain out a gnat and swallow a camel. They seem particularly attuned to the slightest (even unintentional) word or idea that is even subtly unorthodox and jump at the opportunity to correct, judge and teach all the while being blind to charity, context and the intentions of those that need correcting

👍
 
Of course any such acts are bad no matter who does them. Your basically saying that it’s ok for Christians to commit the same atrocities that ISIS is committing right now but it’s not as bad somehow? Your should go to confession right now for your vile thoughts.
Christians arent committing any atrocities.
 
We’ve given proof. You haven’t denied that our examples were not true. If you are looking for those types of atrocities being committed today by Christians, there aren’t any. Why are you ignoring the past and not believing that history can repeat itself?
Because your example happened hundreds of years ago and have yet to happen yet. It not proof its happening today!!!

Did the church suddenly stop believing in free will?
 
ANSA) - Vatican City, September 14 - Pope Francis warned Monday that no religion could consider itself safe from fundamentalist elements. “No religion is immune from its own fundamentalism, every confession has a group of fundamentalists, whose job is to destroy in the name of an idea, not reality,” Francis told Buenos Aires FM Mileniium 106.7, an Argentine protestant radio station. “Fundamentalists distance God from the company of His people, they transform him into an ideology. In the name of this ideology, they kill, destroy and defame”. ansa.it/english/news/2015/09/14/pope-says-no-religion-immune-from-fundamentalism_1d942913-b6cd-4a61-9eaa-12387b1c3d67.html

Really? I wonder whom he would think in the Christian religion are out seeking to destroy due to “Fundamentalism”…

Reminds me of when Obama made the moral equivalence between Christianity and Islam.
What I wonder is what the Pope means when he says fundamentalist? I have searched for a definition.
The definition I most commonly found was
A conservative movement in theology among nineteenth- and twentieth-century Christians. Fundamentalists believe that the statements in the Bible are literally true. Note: Fundamentalists often argue against the theory of evolution.

I haven’t seen people kill, destroy and defame for these beliefs. It leads me to believe that he really is talking about something else especially since there is FUNDAMENTAL THEOLOGY
I need a further explanation from him to understand what he meant since what has been written is not clear.
 
Exactly and one of the markers of fundamentalism that Pope Francis mentioned in his list was to ‘calumniate’ … and to condemn others of heresy when not even the hierarchy of the Church uses such a condemnation… is as calumnious as it comes. 👍
  • of calumny who, by remarks contrary to the truth, harms the reputation of others and gives occasion for false judgments concerning them.
    To “condemn others of heresy” would only be calumnious if untrue, hurts the reputation and gives false judgment. Makes me wonder more who the Pope was actually referring too.
 
You can’t be serious. There are many. Westboro Baptists for starters.

I’m not sure what your are disputing. First you say the Pope is observing groups that aren’t there, then you disagree with me whether they do exist or don’t exist.
Call me confused. Not sure what your point is.
Yes you are confused. The Pope stated there are Christian fundamentalists who kill, destroy and defame. He said as much when he didn’t exclude Christianity when he said there are “religions” who do this.

I disagree with his statement as it regards to Christianity.

Clear enough?
 
General definition of Fundamentalism is sticking to the literal interpretation of the Bible. But that in itself isn’t always bad. So what if someone doesn’t believe that the earth is older than 4,000 years or that evolution can’t be true because they believe the Book of Genesis chapter 1 literally. The truth on these two topics doesn’t change anything. A more extended definition is a person holding fast to some idea (not necessarily linked to religion) regardless of the evidence. The problem is how the person expresses such a belief, or if such a belief galvanizes a group of people to act bad in some way. My experience has been that fundamentalism always has some degree of superiority attached to it and that the people holding the belief cannot be wrong no matter what their actions are or the evidence that is presented. That the fundamentalist person or group acts to discredit, discriminate, exclude, etc. others with an opposing view is what I think that the pope is alluding to. Yes, on the extreme end is violence/genocide and that point has already been brought up in this chat. On the other end of the spectrum is simply looking down on someone for their opposing belief. In my opinion, if the fundamentalist belief is allowed to attach itself to a sense of superiority, then nothing good will come of it no matter how “harmless” the expression of this belief is. Sure, currently there are no Catholics going around physically harming others because of their beliefs, but they commit other actions that cause harm to the community and communion of the Church. For instance, the topic of climate change has become a charged political topic in the USA, so much so, some American Catholics have made an effort to discredit the Pope because of his statement confirming that climate change is real and we must act to counter it. I believe one of the statements made was more or less 'Mr. Pope stick to religion and leave science to the scientists. Some nerve I tell you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top