Pope Says There is Only One True Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter sadie2723
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
There are alot of truths out there but only one can be the truth.
God is the truth the way and the life.

So now it comes down to how much of there beliefs contain God or the full Truth.
I mean both Jews and Muslims deny Jesus as being God.

Do they have lesser of the truth or more…

Which one… I wont sit around and be lukewarm.
 
Let’s hear the Holy Scripture on the matter then dear blacktiger.

Tell me how humans will not be in the Hell you say is real.

Tell me about Hell so I can understand it better please.

But- before you do-

do you deny the Trinity?

I ask since most I know happen to deny both.🤷
No, the Trinity makes perfect sense to me. Why do you ask, out of curiosity?

Well, in the Bible it says God is always loving and forgiving etc. It’s on almost every page of it. But then it says if you sin you’ll burn in hell. This is paradoxical. God forgives you no matter what because he understands you.

I don’t know much about what hell exactly is, but I do know that the demons reside there and that people don’t go there. According to the Bible, it’s two paradoxes that contradict each other.

But, as you may have seen, I’m not one to base everything off a Bible that a bunch of people wrote expecting me to fully believe. My true Bible is that of my heart.
 
Too many changes and you lose your identity, your faith, and morals.
"The key-word that describes the doctrine of Roman Catholics is: CHANGE

Pre-Roman Catholic--------- teachings

200 AD
Immersion of infants who are dying, but considered sinless. (Tertullian V.12)

250 AD
North Africa region is first to practice infant baptism and reduced the age of baptism from minors to all newborns. This is opposed by other regions.

257 AD
Baptism by sprinkling for adults instead of immersion first used as an exception for those on sick beds, but it caused great dispute.

300 AD
Prayers for the dead

320 AD
Special dress code of the clergy in worship

325 AD
At the general council of Nice, 325, it was proposed indeed, probably by the Western bishop Hosius, to forbid entirely the marriage of priests; but the motion met with strong opposition, and was rejected.

325 AD
The date for Easter was set.

379 AD
Praying to Mary & Saints. (prayers of Ephraim Syrus)

385 AD
In the West, the first prohibition of clerical marriage, which laid claim to universal ecclesiastical authority, proceeded in 385 from the Roman church in the form of a decretal letter of the bishop Siricius to Himerius, bishop of Tarragona in Spain.

389 AD
Mariolatry begins with Gregory Nazianzen, who mentions in a eulogy, how Justina had besought the virgin Mary to protect her virginity.

400 AD
Impossibility of apostasy or once saved always saved, (Augustine XII.9)

416 AD
Infant baptism by immersion commanded of all infants (Council Of Mela, Austin was the principal director)

430 AD
Exhalation of Virgin Mary: “Mother of God” first applied by the Council of Ephesus

502 AD
Special dress code of the Clergy all the time.

500 AD
The “Habit” of Nuns (Black gowns with white tunics)

519 AD
Lent

526 AD
Extreme Unction

593 AD
The Doctrine of Purgatory popularized from the Apocrypha by Gregory the Great

600 AD
First use of Latin in worship (Gregory I)

Beginning of the Orthodox/Roman Catholic church as we know it today in its present organization.

607 AD
First Pope: Boniface III is the first person to take the title of “universal Bishop” by decree of Emperor Phocas.

608 AD
Pope Boniface IV. turns the Pantheon in Rome into a temple of Mary ad martyres: the pagan Olympus into a Christian heaven of gods.

670 AD
Instrumental music: first organ by Pope Vitalian

709 AD
Kissing of Pope Constantine’s feet

753 AD
Baptism by sprinkling for those on sick beds officially accepted.

787 AD
Worship of icons and statue approved (2nd council of Nicea)

bible.ca/cath-new-doctrines.htm

“I want the truth!” “You can’t handle the truth!” (my apologies to Tom and Jack) :cool:
What is this, the list from Lorraine Bottainer? BTW, not sure if I spelled his name right.

If you would like you can start a thread for each of these and we can all discuss it, or better yet use the search engine. These have already been tackled before. Maybe someone can be kind enough to provide the sites that refute all these. I don’t know them offhand.
 
There are alot of truths out there but only one can be the truth.
God is the truth the way and the life.

So now it comes down to how much of there beliefs contain God or the full Truth.
The are all equal in truth. That’s why they are called truths. But since we are all differnt, everyone’s truth is different from another person’s. We all in the end have one God, but each of us portray him differntly. You are concerned in who has the most power and truth, your ego obviosuly wanting that the ultimate truth to be your beliefs. But that is ofcourse not so, but a nice fantasy.
 
Let’s hear the Holy Scripture on the matter then dear blacktiger.

Tell me how humans will not be in the Hell you say is real.

Tell me about Hell so I can understand it better please.

But- before you do-

do you deny the Trinity?

I ask since most I know happen to deny both.🤷
Bump
 
The are all equal in truth. That’s why they are called truths. But since we are all differnt, everyone’s truth is different from another person’s. We all in the end have one God, but each of us portray him differntly. You are concerned in who has the most power and truth, your ego obviosuly wanting that the ultimate truth to be your beliefs. But that is ofcourse not so, but a nice fantasy.
No I just dont want to compromise truth, because then it would be a lie. Then we would literally be playing with fire.
 
No, the Trinity makes perfect sense to me. Why do you ask, out of curiosity?

Well, in the Bible it says God is always loving and forgiving etc. It’s on almost every page of it. But then it says if you sin you’ll burn in hell. This is paradoxical. God forgives you no matter what because he understands you.

I don’t know much about what hell exactly is, but I do know that the demons reside there and that people don’t go there. According to the Bible, it’s two paradoxes that contradict each other.

But, as you may have seen, I’m not one to base everything off a Bible that a bunch of people wrote expecting me to fully believe. My true Bible is that of my heart.
According to our understanding of hell. Hell is separation from God. God chooses for all of us to be with him. However, he is not going to force us to be with him. In order for us to truly love him we must have the free will to want to love him. Some of us will reject him. For those, they will go to hell, which they choose. That is actually a far kinder choice then the alternative. Which is being forced to spend eternity in heaven with the God that you have rejected and do not love.
 
Hello my brothers and sisters in Christ. I am a Protestant (United Church of Christ) and am faced with a dilemma. My niece got her first marriage annulled, became a Catholic, and will re-marry at a Nuptial Mass. I would like to go in support of them, but I understand I am not allowed to participate in Eucharist, and I am not considered a Christian by Catholics. This is personally painful to me. I am Christian by birth, education, and choice. I feel forced to repress my Christian identity by attending this event. What do you advise? Thank you.
 
Hello my brothers and sisters in Christ. I am a Protestant (United Church of Christ) and am faced with a dilemma. My niece got her first marriage annulled, became a Catholic, and will re-marry at a Nuptial Mass. I would like to go in support of them, but I understand I am not allowed to participate in Eucharist, and I am not considered a Christian by Catholics. This is personally painful to me. I am Christian by birth, education, and choice. I feel forced to repress my Christian identity by attending this event. What do you advise? Thank you.
I advise starting a thread in the family slot.
 
Too many changes and you lose your identity, your faith, and morals.
"The key-word that describes the doctrine of Roman Catholics is: CHANGE

Pre-Roman Catholic--------- teachings

200 AD
Immersion of infants who are dying, but considered sinless. (Tertullian V.12)

250 AD
North Africa region is first to practice infant baptism and reduced the age of baptism from minors to all newborns. This is opposed by other regions.

257 AD
Baptism by sprinkling for adults instead of immersion first used as an exception for those on sick beds, but it caused great dispute.

300 AD
Prayers for the dead

320 AD
Special dress code of the clergy in worship

325 AD
At the general council of Nice, 325, it was proposed indeed, probably by the Western bishop Hosius, to forbid entirely the marriage of priests; but the motion met with strong opposition, and was rejected.

325 AD
The date for Easter was set.

379 AD
Praying to Mary & Saints. (prayers of Ephraim Syrus)

385 AD
In the West, the first prohibition of clerical marriage, which laid claim to universal ecclesiastical authority, proceeded in 385 from the Roman church in the form of a decretal letter of the bishop Siricius to Himerius, bishop of Tarragona in Spain.

389 AD
Mariolatry begins with Gregory Nazianzen, who mentions in a eulogy, how Justina had besought the virgin Mary to protect her virginity.

400 AD
Impossibility of apostasy or once saved always saved, (Augustine XII.9)

416 AD
Infant baptism by immersion commanded of all infants (Council Of Mela, Austin was the principal director)

430 AD
Exhalation of Virgin Mary: “Mother of God” first applied by the Council of Ephesus

502 AD
Special dress code of the Clergy all the time.

500 AD
The “Habit” of Nuns (Black gowns with white tunics)

519 AD
Lent

526 AD
Extreme Unction

593 AD
The Doctrine of Purgatory popularized from the Apocrypha by Gregory the Great

600 AD
First use of Latin in worship (Gregory I)

Beginning of the Orthodox/Roman Catholic church as we know it today in its present organization.

607 AD
First Pope: Boniface III is the first person to take the title of “universal Bishop” by decree of Emperor Phocas.

608 AD
Pope Boniface IV. turns the Pantheon in Rome into a temple of Mary ad martyres: the pagan Olympus into a Christian heaven of gods.

670 AD
Instrumental music: first organ by Pope Vitalian

709 AD
Kissing of Pope Constantine’s feet

753 AD
Baptism by sprinkling for those on sick beds officially accepted.

787 AD
Worship of icons and statue approved (2nd council of Nicea)

bible.ca/cath-new-doctrines.htm

“I want the truth!” “You can’t handle the truth!” (my apologies to Tom and Jack) :cool:
smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/36/36_11_6.gifwell we know you can cut n paste but you should know that this bogus list has been posted here about 10,000 times. But just exactly does this have to do with the Chuch being the ne true Church?

smileycentral.com/sig.jsp?pc=ZSzeb112&pp=ZNxdm801CJUS
 
Well, I gotta hand it to the Pope. I like the hard line stance that he is taking on tradition of late, and that is no secret if you read my posts. Today, the Pope and I agree more than ever. In a recent document that was released, the Pope gets down to serious business of affirming that there is only ONE Christian Church out there, and it is the Catholic Church. You can read about it here.

I say, “Way to Go!” I think that it is time to assert that there ARE differences between the so called churches out there, and I like the Pope’s idea that we all need to come together under one proper banner of true teaching. After all, with the upswing in the Muslim population, and their continued unfettered onslaught against Christians world wide, it think that the protestants and other faiths outside the Pope’s teaching would do well to unify under one banner. This, my friends, is going to be the secret to survival in the coming troubled time with Islam.

Now please do me the service of not going off on me about that politically driven “Religion of Peace” stuff…I am not buying. What I want to discuss here are the comments of the Pope and what we can do to make protestants see the light of things.

Cheers!
Nope. According to Fr. Hopko.

ancientfaithradio.com/podcasts/illuminedheart/

So, the EO faith is the true church established by Christ on the confession of Peter. He notes the RC Church has mechanical succession (I guess as do the Anglicans) but since they do not have the Apostolic faith and have added to it (eg Papal doctinres), they are not the “True Church” (the one Holy Catholic & Apostolic Church).

I enjoyed hearing it. I imagine them is fighting words Hey…I guess you RC’s are in the same boat as us Anglicans. 😃

Time to do an iron man marathon… swim across the Tiber, hike and then swim the Bosphorus. :eek: To be deep in hisotry is to be Orthodox???

Rev North
 
Since there is nothing really new here, it is difficult to be offended.

Of course the justification for this assertion reduces to “because we said so”. That is because you can not prove this assertion by any other means.

For those of us who are not in the set “we” the reason “because we said so” is um…unconvincing.

Now I trust that Pope B. has the humility and Christlikeness to handle this assertion. Wish it were so for the rest of the “One True Church”.

As I have always said, the “One True Church” assertions will have credibility to me when it becomes obvious that the quality of Christianity practiced by the “One True Church” is plainly superior to that which is practiced by the poor defective communities of faith to which I adhere to. Otherwise I will continue to believe that the “One True Church” is just as messed up as the rest of us.
 
What is this, the list from Lorraine Bottainer? BTW, not sure if I spelled his name right.

If you would like you can start a thread for each of these and we can all discuss it, or better yet use the search engine. These have already been tackled before. Maybe someone can be kind enough to provide the sites that refute all these. I don’t know them offhand.
Here’s the point. The headlines read, “Pope says there is only one true church”. So if, in logic, the church has not changed in 2000 years, as some have posted here and in other threads, why the additions? :confused:
 
As I have always said, the “One True Church” assertions will have credibility to me when it becomes obvious that the quality of Christianity practiced by the “One True Church” is plainly superior to that which is practiced by the poor defective communities of faith to which I adhere to. Otherwise I will continue to believe that the “One True Church” is just as messed up as the rest of us.
Ummmm, so the Presbyterian Church that sanctifies the marriage of Gay Men and allows for abortion is morally superior to the Roman Catholic Church?
 
“In the beginning Mass was celebrated only once a week, then three or four times, and finally, in the fifth or sixth century, every day.” (Legislation on the Sacraments in the New Code of Canon Law, 87)

Unchanging huh? Do you need further examples?🤷
How is the number of times that Mass is celebrated an issue of morality?

I’m talking about moral issues that have been spoken about dogmatically (ie. abortion, homosexuality, contraception, etc.).
 
Here’s the point. The headlines read, “Pope says there is only one true church”. So if, in logic, the church has not changed in 2000 years, as some have posted here and in other threads, why the additions? :confused:
It’s already been pointed out that is a bogus list. Like I said start a thread or do a search on Loraine Boettner’s list. It’s already been refuted, and no, that list is not even accurate.
 
Ummmm, so the Presbyterian Church that sanctifies the marriage of Gay Men and allows for abortion is morally superior to the Roman Catholic Church?
I’m not Presbyterian so this is a strawman to me.

My church does not sanctify the marriage of gay men and does not believe in abortion thank you.

Besides I am not even claiming my church is morally superior. I just don’t see the superiority in yours that you claim exists.
 
Ecumenism? What does that mean-we water down the truth so others will like us better?

You are aware tha the Vatican didnt say anythig new today? You are aware that this is the consistent teaching of the Church for the last 2,000 years?
I believe the Pope and the Vatican did screw the ecumenical movement up.

Comments like “the Orthodox is a true church but has a wound in it…” because it doesn’t believe in the Petrine Doctrine that the RCC formulated? Remember St. Peter didn’t find the Patriarchate of Rome first, he founded the Patriarchate of Antioch and of Alexandria before Rome.

Of the 5 Patriarchates of the ancient Church, Rome was given the title of first among equals only because the Patriarchate of Rome was in the capital of the Roman Empire. Similarly the early Church was never ruled or run by one bishop. It was done through meetings of councils and synods.

So to answer your question, I do think the Pope and the Vatican did throw a wrench into ecumenical discussions with the second largest body of Christianity…the Eastern Orthodox!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top