Here is an interesting story concerning this very thing, and a Bollywood actor. He claims the airport security people made printouts of his silhouette. Who knows if he’s telling the truth or the airport, but there will always be this risk.I never felt it was wrong to display the silhouette of passengers for the safety and security of everyone. It is not like someone is taking a picture and turning it into a centerfold for a sleazy magazine. Body after body - all day long - and everyone stays safe.
Anyway - I just think that airport scanners reflect the difficult times we live in…the cost of keeping people safe…the cost of flying.
Given a choice - I’d rather not fly. I prefer walking or bicycling![]()
I suppose the risk is greatest for famous figures and such…that would not be me. Such is the price of fame and fortune …I guess.Here is an interesting story concerning this very thing, and a Bollywood actor. He claims the airport security people made printouts of his silhouette. Who knows if he’s telling the truth or the airport, but there will always be this risk.
telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/bollywood/7203872/Airport-denies-body-scanner-photo-claim-by-Bollywood-star-Shahrukh-Khan.html
BRITAIN and the US face a new al-Qaeda terror threat from so-called suicide body bombers with explosives surgically inserted inside them.
An operation by the UK intelligence service MI5 uncovered evidence that al-Qaeda was planning a new stage in its terror campaign by surgically inserting explosives inside terrorists, British newspaper The Mail on Sunday reported.
The explosive pentaerythritol tetranitrate, commonly known as PETN, would be placed in a plastic sachet inside the bomber’s body before the wound was stitched up like a normal operation incision and allowed to heal, experts said.
Al-Qa’ida terrorists could have bombs surgically implantedIt would then be detonated with an injection of triacetone triperoxide, administered with syringes that could be smuggled onto planes disguised as a diabetic’s insulin kit.