Pope tells bishops to have compassion on those with failed marriages [CNA]

  • Thread starter Thread starter CNA_News
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CNA_News

Guest
On Friday Pope Francis stopped by a formation course for bishops on the new marriage nullity process, telling attendees that as bishops, and now as local judges in annulment cases, they must pursue the truth, but never exclude those whose marriages have failed.

The Church, “who is embodied in the sad stories and sufferings of the people,” bends down to the poor “and to those who are far away from the ecclesial community or consider themselves outside of it due to their marital failure,” the Pope said Nov. 18.

Despite whatever distance couples who find themselves in this situation might feel, “they are and remain incorporated in Christ in virtue of their baptism,” Francis said.

He stressed that the Church has always had the attitude of a mother “who welcomes and loves, following the example of Jesus the Good Samaritan.” Because of this, it is the responsibility of bishops to never “consider them strangers to the Body of Christ, which is the Church.”

Pope Francis spoke to bishops currently in Rome to participate in a Nov. 17-19 formation course on the new, streamlined annulment process rolled out last year.

He reformed the process for the causes of marriage nullity in December 2015, giving the possibility of a stronger role to local bishops, among other things.

According to the new norms, the bishop may act as a judge in cases of nullity, and can use a swifter process than is typical when nullity is “sustained by particularly evident arguments.”

The reformed process was officially put into place by two documents, Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus (The Lord Jesus, a meek judge) and Mitis et misericors Iesus (Jesus, meek and merciful), which reformed the Code of Canon Law and the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, respectively.

In addition to the increased role open to the local bishop, the reform also dropped the requirement of an automatic appeal when one tribunal found a marriage to be null, and ensured that the process would be free of charge. It also established that each diocese must have its own tribunal.

Pope Francis’ reforms were intended to simplify and streamline the process, while also safeguarding the indissolubility of marriage.

His visit to the Rota for the course fell nearly one year after the new process went into effect Dec. 8, 2015, coinciding with the feast of the Immaculate Conception and the launch of the Jubilee of Mercy.

The Roman Rota is one of three tribunals in the Roman Curia, and is the court of higher instance, usually at the appellate stage, with the purpose of safeguarding rights within the Church.

In his speech to course participants, Pope Francis said that bishops, while having been made “teachers of the faith” through their consecration, must also “continually learn.”

To learn in this sense, he said, “is to understand the needs and questions of humanity today and to look for answers in the Word of God and in the truth of the faith.”

He pointed to Bl. Paul VI’s 1975 apostolic exhortation Evangelii nuntiandi, in which the late Roman Pontiff encouraged evangelization efforts to take place “not in a superficial way,” but by “descending into the concrete situations of people.”

“Attention to people is the underlying theological and ecclesial motive for this formation course,” the Pope said, adding that spiritual health and “the salus animarum (salvation of souls)” of the persons entrusted to them “is the end of every pastoral action.”

The mission of a bishop, he said, is ultimately expressed in the First Letter of Saint Peter, in which the apostle encourages pastors at the time to tend to their flock not because they are forced to, “but willingly, as would God,” and to do so with “a generous heart” while providing an example for the flock.

“In this perspective, it is necessary to decisively eliminate every impediment of a worldly nature which makes it difficult for a large number of faithful to access ecclesiastical tribunals,” he said, stressing that economic or organizational problems “cannot be an obstacle to the canonical verification of the validity of marriage.”

Francis then spoke of the “healthy relationship” between justice and charity, explaining that Church law can’t ignore “the fundamental principle of salus animarum.”

Because of this, ecclesiastical tribunals “are called to be a tangible expression of a diaconal service of the laws in regard to this primary end,” he said, noting that the salvation of souls indicates “the horizon of mercy.”

Pope Francis noted that the questions the bishops bring from their own dioceses and experience of marriage pastoral ministry “require answers and actions that are not always easy.”

However, he voiced his confidence that the course would help them to find “the most appropriate approach to the various problems,” and thanked the Dean of the Rota, Msgr. Pio Vito Pinto, as well as the other speakers, who included Cardinal Christoph Schonborn of Vienna, for their “competent legal, theological, and pastoral contribution.”

Pope Francis closed his speech by encouraging the bishops to return to their dioceses “enriched with notions and useful tips in order to perform your ministry more effectively, especially regarding the new marriage process.”

This process, he said, is “an important help” in terms of to growing their flocks in imitation of Christ the Good Shepherd, “from whom we must daily learn the wise search of the unum necessarium (one thing necessary): the salvation of souls.”

He prayed that the Holy Spirit, who “invisibly but truly guides the Church,” would help both them “and also the Successor of Peter to respond with availability and humility to the cry of help of so many of our brothers and sisters who need to discover the truth of their marriage and their ways of life.”

Full article…
 
Basically, he is urging the bishops to approve of most annulments?
 
Basically, he is urging the bishops to approve of most annulments?
I think Pope Francis originally authorized the Bishops to approve annulments in obvious cases in order to reduce the burden/backlog of tribunals. He seems to be expanding the role.

ALSO

The title is misleading. Marriage is a sacrament instituted by God. Marriages cannot fail. It’s like saying a Baptism or Holy Orders failed. Relationships, however, can fail.
 
I think Pope Francis originally authorized the Bishops to approve annulments in obvious cases in order to reduce the burden/backlog of tribunals. He seems to be expanding the role.
I did not see where he expanded that role. Could you point out where the article gave that impression?
 
The title is misleading. Marriage is a sacrament instituted by God. Marriages cannot fail. It’s like saying a Baptism or Holy Orders failed. Relationships, however, can fail.
I wonder if the OP’s title is misleading, or if the pope actually said that.
 
I did not see where he expanded that role. Could you point out where the article gave that impression?
It wasn’t a single statement that gave me that impression. It’s more the fact that they have a three day course on annulments and Pope Francis is emphasizing the importance of their new responsibility. My impression is that he wants the bishops to rule in some less than obvious cases.
 
It wasn’t a single statement that gave me that impression. It’s more the fact that they have a three day course on annulments and Pope Francis is emphasizing the importance of their new responsibility. My impression is that he wants the bishops to rule in some less than obvious cases.
While the bishops in general have advanced degrees in various philosophical or theological disciplines, most bishops do not have substantial training in Canon Law. If they do, it is often in case law related to parishes and clergy, not to marriage tribunals.

3 days is actually rather light for even the task of ruling on the simple cases.
 
While the bishops in general have advanced degrees in various philosophical or theological disciplines, most bishops do not have substantial training in Canon Law. If they do, it is often in case law related to parishes and clergy, not to marriage tribunals.

3 days is actually rather light for even the task of ruling on the simple cases.
Thanks. I always thought priests were knowledgeable about annulments.
 
Nowhere in the article does it say that the Pope is urging Bishops to approve more annulments…it does say that Bishops may act as judge in cases where nullity is “sustained by particularly evident arguments”…now I may not be the brightest light on the Christmas tree but I don’t think you have to be a Philadelphia lawyer to figure out that doesn’t mean anything like allowing more annulments…it simply means that where there is convincing evidence in favor of an annulment the Bishop may…while in pursuit of the truth…use his discretionary judgment allowing for a speedier outcome…the reform also says that each diocese establish its own tribunal…so once again it seems pretty obvious that where the annulment might not be so cut and dried then the Bishop would accede to the judgment of the diocesan tribunal in such cases…the article also stressed that the reforms were to simplify and streamline the annulment process while safeguarding the indissolubility of marriage…as in all his Holiness says he talks of the love and mercy of Christ and his church…if anyone thinks that is trying to change church doctrine or compromise or water down church teaching in any way…then I guess we would have to agree to disagree.🙂
 
The way it was explained to me is both the petitioner and respondent must agree to have the bishop sit as the judge. If either person does not agree, the trial is routed to the tribunal. Since we are dealing with people who have went through (among other things) the civil divorce process, it is safe to assume that not all annulments will go before the bishop.

One instance where this would be a benefit to all involved is when certain procedures were not followed at the time of marriage. For instance, my x was very anxious to get married and simply would not accept the 6 month time period between going to the priest to declare our desire to wed and the actual date. The parish even acquiesced to her demands to shorten the length of marriage prep (meeting weekly for 8 weeks and the silly “you must attend a marriage encounter weekend before marrying” were simply not needed in my spouse’s opinion) prior to our nuptials. In a case such as this, I would think the bishop would have a very easy time rendering the decision concerning the annulment.

However… there is always that part that both parties must agree to the bishop being the judge…
 
The way it was explained to me is both the petitioner and respondent must agree to have the bishop sit as the judge. If either person does not agree, the trial is routed to the tribunal. Since we are dealing with people who have went through (among other things) the civil divorce process, it is safe to assume that not all annulments will go before the bishop.

One instance where this would be a benefit to all involved is when certain procedures were not followed at the time of marriage. For instance, my x was very anxious to get married and simply would not accept the 6 month time period between going to the priest to declare our desire to wed and the actual date. The parish even acquiesced to her demands to shorten the length of marriage prep (meeting weekly for 8 weeks and the silly “you must attend a marriage encounter weekend before marrying” were simply not needed in my spouse’s opinion) prior to our nuptials. In a case such as this, I would think the bishop would have a very easy time rendering the decision concerning the annulment.

However… there is always that part that both parties must agree to the bishop being the judge…
Your marriage is not automatically invalid because you did not follow the marriage preparation set out by your Parish.
 
Your marriage is not automatically invalid because you did not follow the marriage preparation set out by your Parish.
True - or otherwise we would have to find every marriage invalid where there was little or no preparation in advance - which would nullify every marriage that took place between the fall of the Roman Empire and Vatican II.
 
Thanks. I always thought priests were knowledgeable about annulments.
My impression as well. I think a lot of parish priests would have an even better command of it than the bishops would, because they have a part in a lot of them. Then, too, they often know the individuals.
 
I wonder if the OP’s title is misleading, or if the pope actually said that.
The rule in this sub-forum strictly demands that the news thread titles must match the article headline. This original post, in fact, was automatically generated by the Catholic News Agency…as was the title of the thread, in compliance with forum rules.
 
Your marriage is not automatically invalid because you did not follow the marriage preparation set out by your Parish.
I never said it would be invalid automatically. I simply stated that when the church sets up rules and regulations that are prerequisite to getting married, and then they the church do not enforce their own rules and regulations, then the church itself owns more than a small part of the marriage that ends in a civil divorce. If the church waives prep that is meant to help build lifelong marriages, then it should be pretty easily argued that the couple was not adequately prepared.

This is based on the assumption that the marriage prep was implemented for the purpose of helping marriages last until death. IF this is the true reason that the church implemented marriage prep and then they marry couples without them going through all of the instruction that was meant to build lifelong marriages, when that marriage encounters a civil divorce then it is my belief that the church has blood on her hands as well.
I guess it’s possible that the marriage prep was not implemented to help create strong, lifelong marriages but rather as a symbolic gesture to cast the illusion that the catholic church actually cares about strong, lifelong marriages and the marriage prep requirement can be waived if requested (or more accurately demanded) by a prospective bride or groom. . IF this happens to be the case, the church is actively participating in making marriage a joke, a sham, and a ridiculous ruse masquerading as a sacrament.

At least this is my take on all of this…
 
when that marriage encounters a civil divorce then it is my belief that the church has blood on her hands as well.

/…/

IF this happens to be the case, the church is actively participating in making marriage a joke, a sham, and a ridiculous ruse masquerading as a sacrament.

At least this is my take on all of this…
Having officiated at many weddings – at times in extraordinary pastoral circumstances – over my years, I will just limit my comment to say that I find the image grotesque and the assessment to be wanting in the extreme.
 
It wasn’t a single statement that gave me that impression. It’s more the fact that they have a three day course on annulments and Pope Francis is emphasizing the importance of their new responsibility. My impression is that he wants the bishops to rule in some less than obvious cases.
You are, essentially, correct. The bishop of the diocese has, by his office, executive, legislative and judicial power. Typically, the judicial vicar of the diocese and those associated with him exercise the bishop’s authority in this realm – but Pope Francis has reminded the bishops that the prerogative is proper to their office and that they should not simply hand off the matter to others but should be directly engaged and doing so in a very hands-on manner.

I greet this positively. How it is implemented will, of course, of necessity vary from diocese to diocese and bishop to bishop. I am especially touched by the solicitude some bishops are showing in terms of what they are choosing to take on.
 
. If the church waives prep that is meant to help build lifelong marriages, then it should be pretty easily argued that the couple was not adequately prepared.

This is based on the assumption that the marriage prep was implemented for the purpose of helping marriages last until death. IF this is the true reason that the church implemented marriage prep and then they marry couples without them going through all of the instruction that was meant to build lifelong marriages, when that marriage encounters a civil divorce then it is my belief that the church has blood on her hands as well.
I don’t know how marriage prep can help marriages last. A good marriage is a result of two mature people, preferably strong in faith, building a life together. No prep can help them, the foundations were laid long before that. Just the fact that the church requires this course tells us everything about modern society and how ill equipped it is to raise people who are capable of lifelong marriage. The church is fighting a hard battle.
 
The marriage vows are pretty straightforward, promising permanence and fidelity to one person until death. The vows are not hard to understand. They are made publicly, by the couple to each other in front of the whole community with God as their witness. But those making the vows have to mean what they say and intend to keep that commitment for life.

It seems that at some point after, say, 1960, vast numbers of people either ceased to mean what they were saying, or manufactured hundreds of loopholes in their heads which implicitly added an unspoken addendum to the vows: “But…, except…, if…” Maybe an aspect of marriage prep should simply be a review of what it means to make a vow for life, and to mean what you say.
 
Maybe an aspect of marriage prep should simply be a review of what it means to make a vow for life, and to mean what you say.
Here is an exercise we were given in prep.
There were a lot of couples.
We had to say aloud one by one about our future spouse" I like that you are …" ( two reasons why we had chosen him/ her).
When we had all finished saying,the old priest said something like,remember this you said,and mind these same things are not the ones that bother you in years to come.
Guess what? Bingo…
This concrete exercise helped us through in bad weather.
Sharing with you now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top