I see McGuiness and his henchmen have educated you well…
Well I actually got both my Undergraduate and Masters degrees in Irish history at British universities…and attended a Catholic convent school before that…so I wasn’t in any way educated by Mc Guinness and co, as you mistakenly assert.
I know from my own experiences patrolling in the Province…
As someone who was involved in the conflict, I don’t think you can hold an impartial view, whereas I on the other hand have never been involved in any way, and can take a more unbiased view, formed by, at the very least, 5 years of study an university.
Also, its not a province. The 9 counties of Ulster, have 3 in the Republic of Ireland, whereas the ‘6 counties’ consititute Northern Ireland. A minor jurisdictional/international border issue I wouldn’t expect the average squaddie form Britain to understand.
one has his theology from the Vatican and the other from the Chapel?).
You spent so much time on the ground in Ireland to not realise Catholics would commonly say they were ‘going to Chapel’, when going to mass, whereas the Protestant community would say ‘going to Church’ . Though I do understand, that in England at least, some Protestants, Methodists maybe, would say going to Chapel on a Sunday…
We should have just pulled out, let both sides loose on one another and let you all pick up the body parts later.
This seems to be a typical response from British people who haven’t looked at the situation.They believe it has nothing to do with them. Northern Ireland is the UKs problem. It is part of the UK. That a system of political discrimination akin to apartheid was allowed to exist in a part of the UK, is a poor reflection on the UK as a whole. While you had your vote in Britain, Catholics in Northern Ireland, also a part of the UK, were denied that right.These laws and practices would not have been tolerated in England, Scotland, or Wales. The recent ‘troubles’ was brought about from the reactions of the Northern Ireland (Protestant) government, and the intervention and impostion of direct rule from London alongside the deployment of troops. Incidently, the Catholic community initially welcomed the Brtish troops. They, wrongly, hoped the troops would prevent the violent reaction of the establishment/Protestant community against the civil rights movement.
The Pope’s safety cannot be guaranteed.
Seeing as there are historical precidents in modern times where the British government couldn’t safegaurd equal rights for all of its citizens, and that specifically anti-Catholic laws remain on the statute books, I think it’s probably true that they couldn’t guarantee the safety of the worlds most prominent Roman Catholic.