P
philipl
Guest
I am really curious as to what things you see as “needs” and “wants”? Why do you think there is a difference?Can you point out some of the created “needs”? Can you be somewhat specific?
I am really curious as to what things you see as “needs” and “wants”? Why do you think there is a difference?Can you point out some of the created “needs”? Can you be somewhat specific?
My comments were totally tongue-in-cheek … an extension of others’ comments about the Pope being a socialist.Why ??? We would miss you.
We all have different gifts to share.
Our dear Jesus never asked for " just another brick in the wall".
You eould love our Pope ,he is a lovable simple person.
Consider staying !!!
Ps I see I am.typing like a monkey with a razor. Excuse mu mistakes.
Monasteries are voluntary associations.My comments were totally tongue-in-cheek … an extension of others’ comments about the Pope being a socialist.
However, as an anthropologist I have no problem with communism, per se, since it was likely the economic system of 99% of our human history – generalized reciprocity or “primitive communism” or “caring and sharing” as we have in monasteries.
As mentioned some 99% of human history societies (not voluntary orgs within them) were communistic. It was a strategy to increase chances for survival. Without ability to store and horde, people “invested” and “stored” in good human relations by caring and sharing.Monasteries are voluntary associations.
That’s the difference between capitalism and socialism. There is nothing to prevent individuals from living in a community under a capitalist government. Under a socialist government, your choices are limited and there are many activities that the government won’t permit.
Which country is this? Is the government corrupt?Poverty can be a result of these things, however there are other causes of poverty as well. For example, I have a friend who works hard and makes $250 a month in a developing country. He doesn’t drink nor does he squander his money, but he is likely to be poor for most of his life, because he lacks access to education and other factors that contribute to higher incomes. There are two basic reasons why people are poor: first, people do stupid things, second, bad things happen (i.e. born in the wrong country) or lack of opportunity. We don’t really know what percentage of poor people come from each cause.
Living in community is not communism.As mentioned some 99% of human history societies (not voluntary orgs within them) were communistic. It was a strategy to increase chances for survival. Without ability to store and horde, people “invested” and “stored” in good human relations by caring and sharing.
However, it is interesting that one anthropologist, Pospisil, found a tribal society in New Guinea (one out of the very many) that practiced “primitive capitalism” and didn’t really have a religion to speak of, going against the stereotype of tribal societies.
Right.Living in community is not communism.
Under a capitalist system you can choose to live communally.
You can’t choose to start your own business under a socialist government unless the government approves.
Freedom is better than slavery. Capitalism is better than socialism.
Capitalism does no such thing.Right.
Caring and sharing is NOT COMMUNISM. Any “ism” that subordinates human flourishing and dignity to an “ism” is harmful, including capital"ism" and communi"ism".
Capitalism is not “human freedom” any more than communism. Capitalism can coerce just like any other system. Human beings are not subject to isms, we are children of God FIRST.Capitalism does no such thing.
Capitalism is human freedom. All other forms of state sponsored economics involve coercion.
That’s not true. Under capitalism, all transactions are voluntary.Capitalism is not “human freedom” any more than communism. Capitalism can coerce just like any other system. Human beings are not subject to isms, we are children of God FIRST.
All? Every single one?That’s not true. Under capitalism, all transactions are voluntary.
All transactions under capitalism are voluntary. No one forces you to buy or sell anything.All? Every single one?
Come on, you know that’s ridiculous.
I have to engage in quite a few transactions that are less than voluntary. I suppose I could refuse to do so, and let my daughter starve, and not have a roof over her head. If that’s what you mean by “voluntary,” I suppose you’re right.
It is a personal path as I said and a decent job to feed your family is already a driving force.Can you point out some of the created “needs”? Can you be somewhat specific?
Ok. There are " literary devices " I miss sometimes in the threadsMy comments were totally tongue-in-cheek … an extension of others’ comments about the Pope being a socialist.
However, as an anthropologist I have no problem with communism, per se, since it was likely the economic system of 99% of our human history – generalized reciprocity or “primitive communism” or “caring and sharing” as we have in monasteries.
You can choose to shop from grocery store A or from grocery store B, or from the local market C, or from restaurant D, etc, etc, etc, etc.All? Every single one?
Come on, you know that’s ridiculous.
I have to engage in quite a few transactions that are less than voluntary. I suppose I could refuse to do so, and let my daughter starve, and not have a roof over her head. If that’s what you mean by “voluntary,” I suppose you’re right.
What about Catholic"ism"?Right.
Caring and sharing is NOT COMMUNISM. Any “ism” that subordinates human flourishing and dignity to an “ism” is harmful, including capital"ism" and communi"ism".
For 99% of human history, people were not free. You’ve proven against your own point.As mentioned some 99% of human history societies (not voluntary orgs within them) were communistic.
Well gee, this is what I wrote:What about Catholic"ism"?
What do you think? Do you still have a question?Originally Posted by clem456 View Post
Right.
Caring and sharing is NOT COMMUNISM. Any “ism” that subordinates human flourishing and dignity to an “ism” is harmful, including capital"ism" and communi"ism".
Yes. Because I don’t see anything inherent to capitalism that subordinates human dignity or flourishing. In fact I see the opposite.Well gee, this is what I wrote:
What do you think? Do you still have a question?
They were a whole lot freer than people today in either capitalistic or communistic societies, and in the most democratic societies of today.For 99% of human history, people were not free. You’ve proven against your own point.