I took the liberty of moving some of Darryl’s paragraphs.
JReducation: “God as a human invention,” is a major argument against God.
Darryl1958: Atheists may even acknowledge this, but not without the horror of realizing that human nature evolved into what in effect is a freak show, a biological dead end where accommodating our most primal desires is not even possible.
A very nihilistic view of human nature. The atheist will not grant man a dispensation to find God. He challenges others to prove the existence of God, while he does nothing, a rather interesting, but negative approach to reality. Reality can always be experienced, but it cannot always be proven with sensory evidence. If I could produce to corpse, then Jesus did not rise. On other hand, because I cannot produce a corpse, the resurrection is rejected. It was a thesis doomed from the beginning, which is what makes resurrection worthy of intellectual attention and ultimately credible.
Our only hope for happiness then, lies in the idea that the transcendent is real. Rejecting the idea of a transcendent reality then, condemns us to lives of ultimate frustration.
I would reword it. Our hope to happiness depends on our acceptance of the transcendent reality. Karl Rahner referred to this acceptance of the transcendent as
a leap in faith. This is consistent with the explanations about faith in Catholic doctrine. Faith is a gift. Man accepts the gift, without full knowledge.
. . . the ultimate irony that in accepting the freedom that comes to being gods unto ourselves with no intelligence or will in the universe being higher than our own, we are faced with the knowledge that this freedom from anything higher can never liberate, but only frustrate.
Not only does it become the ultimate frustration for man, but I believe that to discover that our liberation from God actually cripples our progress toward freedom is probably the ultimate hell of the unbeliever.
Condemned to freedom, life as an ultimate absurdity—this is the conclusion of atheistic thinkers too.
Once again, liberation from a superior transcendent reality (God) cripples our efforts to achieve those desires that transcend our limits. However, this fact does not extinguish those desires. To take God out of the equation makes us slaves of our desires, since we can never achieve them.
This idea may well lead us back to William James and the idea that the truth of an idea lies in its pragmatism. God is true because he needs to be true What is necessary, is necessarily true. This is to wildly paraphrase James, of course.
To say that “God is true, because he needs to be true,” simplifies what James said, a little too much. But it remains in the ball park. God does not “need” anything. God is completely fulfilled in himself, according to revelation. He remains real because he cannot be false. The concept of falsehood is contrary to the nature of the god-head. Therefore, God is true If he were not true, he would not be God. It sounds circular, but it really is not. Watch this.
P1: Truth and falsehood are contradictions.
P2: Perfection never contradicts itself.
Concl. Perfection is truth.
P1: Perfection is truth.
P2: God is perfect.
Concl. Therefore God is truth.
P1: God is truth.
P2: God is perfect.
Concl. God is perfect truth.
To take God out of society is a social threat. However, there are those who will not accept the arguments of reason, because they do not credit any reason, but there own. Let’s examine this.
We are speaking about what God is in his nature, but we cannot provide a subject empirical examination; the nature of any being is not in its parts, but in the Gestalt; and since God’s nature is simply perfect truth and truth has no parts, then God is a simple single whole. In which case, at this time we can only know him through tradition and existentially. Thus the faith that has been revealed to us from Abraham to the last of the apostles, is possible and probable, because it tells the story of God’s truly perfect nature through human experience within the context of Salvation History.
Solidarity and the brotherhood of mankind are what kept many atheists clinging to their hope that a common good was at least possible without transcendence. The proletariat paradise was posited to be the materialistically real ‘transcendent’ reality that we could all aspire to……
Subscript is mine. Observe that what sustained the hope of many atheists are the covenants between God and man. Solidarity and brotherhood was first destroyed by Cain. And now, we have social and economic systems that build their houses on the foundation of the covenant between God and man, established at the gates of Eden. *“You will be my people and I will be your God.” * For man to be a people for God, he must grow in solidarity and brotherhood. That community evolved from a nomadic Israel to become the Mystical Body of Christ.
This is a particularly difficult venture in a pluralistic culture such as the North American one, but not impossible. As long as the structure of a society remains secular, and rationality is deferred to for common agreement, there is enough of God’s law written into the hearts of all men that cooperation is not just possible, but likely.
Of course there is great probability here that man can cooperate with God’s law, even while he remains unaware of having experienced God. The reason that he remains unaware is because he does not understand God. When you lack understanding, you cannot name your experience appropriately. But this does not deny or diminish the reality of the experience of God in the human conscience and soul. Nor does it diminish man’s duty to cooperate with the truth he knows, even if he does not yet know the source of that truth, whose fulness is revealed through the Catholic Church.
Not only does God have a place in society, but so does the Church. Because through the Church, which is the Mystical Body, we experience the reality of God and hear his voice through the voice of conscience and reason, even if one is not a physical member of the Church. In her intimate relationship with Christ, the Church spreads in every direction. She is the sole means through which God’s truth and the truth about God can be experienced Man responds first, converts next, and comprehends later, just like the story from Genesis to the Book of Revelation. This expansion of the Church, as the Mystical Bride of Christ allows God to penetrate even the hearts and conciences of those outside the physical Church. God reaches out through the Church’s mission and presence. Without which, the only end result is a Godless society.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF
