Portland [Maine] bishop says Catholic Church won’t actively campaign against gay marriage [this time]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dale_M
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Dale_M

Guest
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland will not actively campaign against a statewide referendum seeking to legalize same-sex marriage but instead will focus on teaching parishioners about the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman, the bishop announced Friday.
More than two years ago, Maine voters rejected gay marriage in a statewide vote, 53 percent to 47 percent, after it had been passed by the Legislature and signed by then-Gov. John Baldacci. During the 2009 successful referendum to repeal same-sex marriage, the church gave $500,000 and lent its public policy director full time to the campaign.
“We’re going to be involved in the issue and vigorously, but in a much different way than we were the last time around,” Malone said in an interview last month in Bangor. “My main thrust is going to be to take my role as the chief teacher of the diocese seriously and to try more effectively to teach and inform Catholic people about our teaching on the nature of marriage and why marriage is the union of one man and one woman — not as an attack on gay people but to say what marriage is, both from what we know from natural law and God’s revelation in Scripture.”
bangordailynews.com/2012/03/02/news/state/portland-bishop-says-catholic-church-wont-actively-campaign-against-gay-marriage/

I guess I am not too surprised. Bishop Malone had a high profile role in the successful 2009 drive to overturn the same-sex marriage law. However, he later described the campaign as “brutal.” He said the worst part was the “onslaught by dissenting Catholics” who publicly challenged his leadership in meetings and in newspaper ads.
 
bangordailynews.com/2012/03/02/news/state/portland-bishop-says-catholic-church-wont-actively-campaign-against-gay-marriage/

I guess I am not too surprised. Bishop Malone had a high profile role in the successful 2009 drive to overturn the same-sex marriage law. However, he later described the campaign as “brutal.” He said the worst part was the “onslaught by dissenting Catholics” who publicly challenged his leadership in meetings and in newspaper ads.
“dissenting Catholics” are Catholics anymore?
Luther and Calvin were dissenting Catholics.
The worst enemy is the one which is inside.
Remember the Troy Horse.
 
DiSSenters are not Catholics. They follow their own religion, the religion of the self.
They just won’t admit it. And thus they lie to themselves and everyone else.

This bishop should not whine about how he was treated. Look what they did to Athanasius, when 80% of the bishops were holding Aryan heresy.
 
Telling my Lord Bishop to grow a spine will hardly help. Praying for him will.
 
Dissenters are not truly Catholic when it involves a black and white issue like this. Anyone who reads the definition of marriage in the Catechism of the Catholic Church should be able to understand why the Church can have no opinion but the one she now proclaims.

However, many people don’t understand this. Those who claim they can be Catholic and disagree with an issue like this do much harm to the reputation of the Catholic Church in the world.

Part of the argument I have heard for the law mandating the inclusion of free contraception etc. in all insurance policies is that most Catholics use birth control, so how can the Church say it violates its conscience to assist women in obtaining it.
 
Telling my Lord Bishop to grow a spine will hardly help. Praying for him will.
Thank you for saying this. I have previously encouraged prayer on his behalf. I think all bishops and priests need it, especially when confronting controversial public issues.
 
Once Catholic, always Catholic. Doesn’t mean they’re good Catholics, but they’re still Catholics.
 
My main thrust is going to be to take my role as the chief teacher of the diocese seriously and to try more effectively to teach and inform Catholic people about our teaching on the nature of marriage and why marriage is the union of one man and one woman — not as an attack on gay people but to say what marriage is, both from what we know from natural law and God’s revelation in Scripture.”
I’m glad to hear this, but he will still be attacked by God’s enemies sitting in the pews who are Democrats first and Catholics second. Some bishops have already said the HHS mandate is lining up to be a liberal vs a conservative issue and this will be no different.
 
Obviously the concept of marriage properly understood is lost in our society. It may not do any good fighting this in an ‘active’ way if nobody cares. The less you attend church, the less you defend marriage. Nobody goes to church, nobody defends marriage.
 
The less you attend church, the less you defend marriage. Nobody goes to church, nobody defends marriage.
Likewise, those who do go to church, **but **do not hear doctrine from their priest and are awash in a sea of apathy, will not defend it either.
 
but do not hear doctrine from their priest and are awash in a sea of apathy, will not defend it either.
I agree, but it turns out that this division is largely along the lines of those who are observant and those who are not. It doesn’t have much to do with one’s professed faith as much as it does in one’s observance and piety. The culture of death loves to blur the difference between church going catholics and cultural catholics who really are agnostics.
 
I think prioritising the education of Catholics is a wonderful idea. It makes me cringe that we can’t/won’t educate our own, yet want to legislate our beliefs on a secular world first, before looking at the sorry state of people already Catholic. Anyway, abortion and contraception might be an easier vote if all Catholics knew their religion better.
 
If you know what your faith teaches and why, you can grow in the love of God; if you grow in the love of God you will be obedient to the teaching; if you are obedient to the teaching, you will resist all that is opposed to it.
 
Telling my Lord Bishop to grow a spine will hardly help. Praying for him will.
It takes a spine to live a life full of celibacy and joyful service to a diverse group of people, which most of the armchair commentators aren’t leading. Even Peter, our first Pope, struggled with the approval of others.
 
Thank you for saying this. I have previously encouraged prayer on his behalf. I think all bishops and priests need it, especially when confronting controversial public issues.
I agree wholeheartedly. But there is one thing that really worries me…

Isn’t the next step of these dissident Catholics to force homosexual marriages, foist them if you will, on the Church of Rome? And, again what worries me, if the Church denies them, as it will, will it lose its tax exempt status for making political opinions/statements?

TBH–that is why I am so opposed to homosexual marriage. I could care less what they do civilly, but my gut tells me that this movement is intent on the Church bending to their will. Even worse than losing its tax exempt status, what if the Church refuses, and then the dissidents can sue it for descrimination?

Not to hijack the subject…I think this comment fits in with this article about the bishop’s position.
 
Once Catholic, always Catholic. Doesn’t mean they’re good Catholics, but they’re still Catholics.
Can you tell the difference between a sheep and a wolf in sheep’s clothing?

Just because someone says they’re Catholic doesn’t mean they really are. People do lie, especially if they don’t believe in the 8th commandment.
 
I agree wholeheartedly. But there is one thing that really worries me…

Isn’t the next step of these dissident Catholics to force homosexual marriages, foist them if you will, on the Church of Rome? And, again what worries me, if the Church denies them, as it will, will it lose its tax exempt status for making political opinions/statements?

TBH–that is why I am so opposed to homosexual marriage. I could care less what they do civilly, but my gut tells me that this movement is intent on the Church bending to their will. Even worse than losing its tax exempt status, what if the Church refuses, and then the dissidents can sue it for descrimination?

Not to hijack the subject…I think this comment fits in with this article about the bishop’s position.
Yes, that is a real fear.
 
There is, and for a long time has been, a wide difference between a civil marriage (which some statutes define as a contract) and a sacramental marriage. Each is governed by different laws; the former by the secular civil law, the latter by canon law. Both bodies of law operate independently. Nothing in any civil law allowing same sex marriage claims or even suggests any effect on canon law. Regardless what changes may be made in the civil law, the Church will not have to recognize any civil marriage as sacramental. This seems much like divorce. Civil law may recognize it as valid, but the Church may not and refuse annulment. If I am wrong about this, I am sure someone will straighten me out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top