Possible Abuses, Please Help Discern

  • Thread starter Thread starter WoundedIcon
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But sometimes when people talk about the OF they don’t mean “the OF practiced by the book: reverently, beautifully, with a certain profound simplicity” they mean “the OF practiced overmuch with bad music, a bad translation, regularly simplified or omitted rituals, and people playing loosey-goosey with the rules.” I prefer the former over even an EF mass, but the only church that offers it that way, as far as I know, is the same one nearest here with an EF - and it’s 30 miles away. So yes, I’m confused, but really I have much bigger concerns than robotic obedience and “smells & bells”. I want to avoid liberal Catholicism like the plague, being as I am a neophyte trying to form myself in lieu of RCIA (which picks back up in three months and a day.) Not to mention it’s the parish I choose that will attend RCIA classes at, so I better choose well.
There are around 5 parishes in Lorain, Ohio. Have you been to all of them? Are they each reasonable to get to? When did you become Catholic? Was it at the Easter Vigil? Do you know why RCIA is so far away? I have always thought that those received into the Church at Easter continued to go to classes for a few weeks right after Easter too.
Peace be with you!
 
Thank you so much.

And yes, no one here can really make any absolute call on whether these things are wrong or not, because they haven’t seen them - but I can still ask around with people more experienced than me. Part of what I’m dealing with is issues with authority - not obeying proper authority, mind you - but knowing whether to trust certain individuals to be using it properly or not. I’ve been to hell and back with neglectful teachers, screwy doctors, etc. so I try to see if the people above me do things right or have things right. In the Church there are several levels to this authority, and it’s the Vatican’s level I care about most of all. Of course their authority is God’s through the Keys, so ultimately it’s Him I want to obey. I became Catholic because of the religion’s authority and doctrinal precision (partial but still main reasons), so that may help a bit in understanding my mindset. Odd for a young person, but I crave (reasonable) rules. Before I converted I was like a leaf flying around during a storm, and I got dead serious and sick of it so I tore through theology and history connecting one thing to another and following what worked together logically. It got to the point where I was basically a semi-Orthodox Methodist in my beliefs, but I realized the need for Papal authority and went Catholic. So when I see any of the precision and orthodoxy being lost or obscured it really gets my goat.
 
WoundedIcon was inquiring about: 1. the laity’s ability to give blessings; 2. relativism; 3. ecumenism; 4. baptism and hell; 5. penance; 6. liturgical music; 7. his/(her?) inability to follow in the missal because of “jarring changes;” 8. the laity’s ability to give blessings; 9. the priest’s location during the homily; and 10. meditation.

Properly speaking, 6, 7, 8, and 9 relate to the liturgy, and so are a question of abuse (and to be sure, nobody has yet ascertained whether the “jarring changes” are abuses or due to WI’s newness and inexperience). 1, 2, 4, and 5 relate to doctrine, and so are questions of heresy. 3 and 10 relate to prudence, and could very well be questions of heresy. Are you really going to be angry with our friend for confusing the concept of abuse with heresy? His only major fault was not posting several of these things to the proper forum. 🤷

Yes, bishops (generally) do have more important things to worry about than the holy water in the font, but if you think that not having holy water out is a trivial matter, you clearly don’t understand what it is. As with all questions, it ought first to be asked of the pastor.

Finally, I would be quite interested in hearing about the liturgical infractions in the beatification Mass. 😃
Peace
No, the OP, despite the inane title of the thread, was not enquiring. He had already made up his mind about the deacon and the priest and that they weren’t to be trusted.

I never said that not having holy water out is a trivial matter (so less of the implication that my understanding is lacking, please) - I said that holy water is not in the fonts between Holy Thursday Mass of the Last Supper and the Easter Vigil. If it is not out after the Vigil it would be more charitable to enquire of the pastor why this is so - it may simply have been overlooked - before putting it in a list of ‘abuses’ to the bishop. Subsidiarity is, after all, a Catholic principle.

As for the liturgical infractions in the beatification Mass, they were (obviously) minor. My point was that one can find infractions in every Mass, in every form, even a papal one, if you really want to nit-pick.
 
There are around 5 parishes in Lorain, Ohio. Have you been to all of them? Are they each reasonable to get to? When did you become Catholic? Was it at the Easter Vigil? Do you know why RCIA is so far away? I have always thought that those received into the Church at Easter continued to go to classes for a few weeks right after Easter too.
Peace be with you!
Ah, I’ve been to two of them but one only for a weekday mass. I haven’t had the chance to visit others just yet.

I call myself Catholic because I’m baptized, believe it fully as the Truth, and try to live it out daily but I haven’t been formally received yet. I went to my first mass ever on the Sunday before Lent began and since then I’ve tried to basically count myself as one of the fold. Went through Lenten reformation and everything. Some people don’t like that I call myself Catholic already (and if it’s improper do tell me), but there was a document (again…) that said that I’m united to the Church in my own imperfect way by virtue of my valid Lutheran baptism. I wasn’t Lutheran though, it’s just that my first baptism got botched when I had to rush it, as a teen, behind my mom’s back at a church that I later found out was an Oneness Pentecostal church, so I felt I needed a true baptism to give me the grace to sift through all the different beliefs, and I asked a Lutheran pastor to do it because at that time I found their beliefs to be respectable. I attended some of the last few classes of RCIA at the parish and have gone to every Sunday when I could and a few weekday masses.
 
And the sprinkling is done at the Easter Vigil, Easter Sunday, and permissible the third, forth and fifth Sundays of the season.
Theoretically, the sprinkling rite can be done at essentially any Mass.
When done that way it replaces the Creed as a renewal of baptismal promises, but can be followed by the Q&A.
That’s true, I believe, only on the Easter vigil. Any other time, the sprinkling rite (or asperges) replaces the Penitential Act (“I confess to Almighty God…”) at the beginning of the Mass, and the Creed must be said in its ordinary place in the liturgy. If memory serves, if actual baptisms are being celebrated in the Mass then the priest can invite the congregation to join in the baptismal promises in place of the Creed, but that has nothing to do with the sprinkling rite.
 
No, the OP, despite the inane title of the thread, was not enquiring. He had already made up his mind about the deacon and the priest and that they weren’t to be trusted.

I never said that not having holy water out is a trivial matter (so less of the implication that my understanding is lacking, please) - I said that holy water is not in the fonts between Holy Thursday Mass of the Last Supper and the Easter Vigil. If it is not out after the Vigil it would be more charitable to enquire of the pastor why this is so - it may simply have been overlooked - before putting it in a list of ‘abuses’ to the bishop. Subsidiarity is, after all, a Catholic principle.

As for the liturgical infractions in the beatification Mass, they were (obviously) minor. My point was that one can find infractions in every Mass, in every form, even a papal one, if you really want to nit-pick.
I don’t hate them Belle, and maybe I should have put the title as “Am I right about these possible abuses” but you really aren’t making any thought out case here. I shouldn’t have to keep telling you that I improperly worded what I said in the post about another parish’s weekday mass though. It’s not that I was about to report them or something. I’ve only been there once! But if that happened along with a bunch of other stuff wrong at my regular parish then yes, I’d include it with the other bigger matters after studying and asking around about whether it’s wrong or not. If a priest says a few wrong words, no big deal. If he does it at every mass along with other more significant things, eyebrows should be raised of course. I still haven’t seen any proof from Church documents about what I’m wrong about though. Sometimes people can be right, and there is no arrogance in holding the line when people say otherwise. Am I absolutely comfortable and certain that I am right? No. But no one has significantly proven otherwise.
 
Theoretically, the sprinkling rite can be done at essentially any Mass.

That’s true, I believe, only on the Easter vigil. Any other time, the sprinkling rite (or asperges) replaces the Penitential Act (“I confess to Almighty God…”) at the beginning of the Mass, and the Creed must be said in its ordinary place in the liturgy. If memory serves, if actual baptisms are being celebrated in the Mass then the priest can invite the congregation to join in the baptismal promises in place of the Creed, but that has nothing to do with the sprinkling rite.
Right, there’s the Asperges and then there’s the renewal of baptism. But I didn’t know it could be done at any Mass, so thank you.
 
I don’t hate them Belle, and maybe I should have put the title as “Am I right about these possible abuses” but you really aren’t making any thought out case here. I shouldn’t have to keep telling you that I improperly worded what I said in the post about another parish’s weekday mass though. It’s not that I was about to report them or something. I’ve only been there once! But if that happened along with a bunch of other stuff wrong at my regular parish then yes, I’d include it with the other bigger matters after studying and asking around about whether it’s wrong or not. If a priest says a few wrong words, no big deal. If he does it at every mass along with other more significant things, eyebrows should be raised of course. I still haven’t seen any proof from Church documents about what I’m wrong about though. Sometimes people can be right, and there is no arrogance in holding the line when people say otherwise. Am I absolutely comfortable and certain that I am right? No. But no one has significantly proven otherwise.
I never said you hated them; I said you had already made up your mind that they were wrong and you didn’t trust them. And you didn’t ‘improperly word’ the post - your meaning was crystal clear; what you don’t like or understand is automatically an ‘abuse’. If this is going to be your attitude towards the Mass - a constant nit-picking and second-guessing of everything the celebrant does - you’re in for a very unhappy time as a Catholic.
 
I’ve been where you are. What I found most confusing is that the Mass I was reading about (I studied the Church a few weeks before every attending) didn’t match up at all with the Mass I was seeing in action.

I don’t think you have any malicious intent, I know I didn’t. But I do agree that the first key is to relax. Instead of focusing on the things that seem like abuses, focus on the things that you enjoy. Ask the Spirit for guidance as well.

People I thought I couldn’t trust still managed to share very valuable information with me when I stopped tuning them out because they said this or that which seemed borderline heretical and/or relativist.

Whether or not things are being done that shouldn’t be done, God is still in the midst of the Mass, as are the angels and even the saints? So no matter what focus on God, focus on worshipping Him and ask Him for guidance when you’re feeling confused. The Holy Spirit is amazing and will provide whatever enlightment you’re ready for.

But that’s just my two cents and my experience…

Good luck!

If your parish is like mine you’re going to need it. 😉
 
I call myself Catholic because I’m baptized, believe it fully as the Truth, and try to live it out daily but I haven’t been formally received yet. I went to my first mass ever on the Sunday before Lent began and since then I’ve tried to basically count myself as one of the fold. Went through Lenten reformation and everything. Some people don’t like that I call myself Catholic already (and if it’s improper do tell me), but there was a document (again…) that said that I’m united to the Church in my own imperfect way by virtue of my valid Lutheran baptism. I wasn’t Lutheran though, it’s just that my first baptism got botched when I had to rush it, as a teen, behind my mom’s back at a church that I later found out was an Oneness Pentecostal church, so I felt I needed a true baptism to give me the grace to sift through all the different beliefs, and I asked a Lutheran pastor to do it because at that time I found their beliefs to be respectable. I attended some of the last few classes of RCIA at the parish and have gone to every Sunday when I could and a few weekday masses.
Ah!! You’re certainly eager! We do consider that you are still imperfectly united to the Catholic Church, since you have not yet gone through two of the Sacraments of Initiation, that is, Eucharist and Confirmation. To that end, I personally don’t mind if you identify yourself as Catholic; that is what you want to be! However, because you are not yet sacramentally Catholic, you should be refraining from receiving Holy Communion, and your ability to make a Confession is also a little up in the air. Basically I think your pastor can give you permission to make a Confession, if he judges it prudent, and you ready.
 
I’ve been where you are. What I found most confusing is that the Mass I was reading about (I studied the Church a few weeks before every attending) didn’t match up at all with the Mass I was seeing in action.

I don’t think you have any malicious intent, I know I didn’t. But I do agree that the first key is to relax. Instead of focusing on the things that seem like abuses, focus on the things that you enjoy. Ask the Spirit for guidance as well.

People I thought I couldn’t trust still managed to share very valuable information with me when I stopped tuning them out because they said this or that which seemed borderline heretical and/or relativist.

Whether or not things are being done that shouldn’t be done, God is still in the midst of the Mass, as are the angels and even the saints? So no matter what focus on God, focus on worshipping Him and ask Him for guidance when you’re feeling confused. The Holy Spirit is amazing and will provide whatever enlightment you’re ready for.

But that’s just my two cents and my experience…

Good luck!

If your parish is like mine you’re going to need it. 😉
I absolutely love the ritual and the way everything is laid out, read, the motions, etc. It’s like a big heavenly theatre of work-of-art prayer-ritual sacrifice. (LOL, my words just failed me.) I always get something out of just being there. But that’s one of the reasons why my eye starts twitching when I feel like folks color by numbers with it. I guess I basically feel like the Council, figuratively speaking, had some kind of artistic expression of high truths in mind for the spirit of it. If you watch a more traditionally done one it’s like the Holy Spirit is there with you, speaking to you through every motion and word and song. It has a certain angelic simplicity and straightforwardness to it that actually conveys very profound things. I saw one in Latin and now I’m spoiled, dangit. :bounce: I think they really did succeed in their intentions to reform the Mass and make it more akin to the original Romish (sic) style of it… concrete imagery, straightforward, elevated, mystical etc. But I have no idea where it all got messy…

Thank you for your advice. I’ve was praying how to see things and I quickly moved away from a preference for the EF Mass to the OF, and then got upset at the modern day practice of it. Oh well. Now I just need to figure out what to do about now. I think I’ll talk to my priest, but I don’t think I can stay there. They have given me some good advice that I accepted, but I just feel like I can’t go along with all of it.
 
Ah!! You’re certainly eager! We do consider that you are still imperfectly united to the Catholic Church, since you have not yet gone through two of the Sacraments of Initiation, that is, Eucharist and Confirmation. To that end, I personally don’t mind if you identify yourself as Catholic; that is what you want to be! However, because you are not yet sacramentally Catholic, you should be refraining from receiving Holy Communion, and your ability to make a Confession is also a little up in the air. Basically I think your pastor can give you permission to make a Confession, if he judges it prudent, and you ready.
Yes, I’ve begun receiving the Sacrament of Penance already. I can’t stand walking around with grave sins on me, and I like to avail myself of all the grace I can to kill 'em.
 
I absolutely love the ritual and the way everything is laid out, read, the motions, etc. It’s like a big heavenly theatre of work-of-art prayer-ritual sacrifice. (LOL, my words just failed me.) I always get something out of just being there. But that’s one of the reasons why my eye starts twitching when I feel like folks color by numbers with it. I guess I basically feel like the Council, figuratively speaking, had some kind of artistic expression of high truths in mind for the spirit of it. If you watch a more traditionally done one it’s like the Holy Spirit is there with you, speaking to you through every motion and word and song. It has a certain angelic simplicity and straightforwardness to it that actually conveys very profound things. I saw one in Latin and now I’m spoiled, dangit. :bounce: I think they really did succeed in their intentions to reform the Mass and make it more akin to the original Romish (sic) style of it… concrete imagery, straightforward, elevated, mystical etc. But I have no idea where it all got messy…

Thank you for your advice. I’ve was praying how to see things and I quickly moved away from a preference for the EF Mass to the OF, and then got upset at the modern day practice of it. Oh well. Now I just need to figure out what to do about now. I think I’ll talk to my priest, but I don’t think I can stay there. They have given me some good advice that I accepted, but I just feel like I can’t go along with all of it.
I’m glad you have options! All we have in my area (three hours drive all around) is NO Mass. So I had to learn to reconcile myself with the Mass I was attending. Then one afternoon I had the distinct pleasure of attending a Catholic mass that was more like a Protestant praise service, complete with only cheap children’s choruses being sung and a congregation that didn’t know when to sit or stand (and more importantly shut up - they sang the doxology with the priest) and after that debacle I SO appreciated my own parish! Haha. Sometimes we have to see something worse to reconcile ourselves to our own little blemishes in our own groups.

You are what I’ve been called; A keener.

It’s wonderful to be on fire! And you’re right. It is a work of art, and a unity… and I get a little irritated when that unity is disrupted because someone wanted to be entertained and/or make Mass more ‘protestant friendly’.

🤷 But I figure God will sort them out. 😃
 
The lack of penance DOES NOT affect the validity of the sacrament. One’s sins are forgiven provided the priest absolves them.
Yes, you are right, and I was in error. However, after looking it up in the Catechism, I read that " It is wrong to put off the performance of a penance too long. **One who intentionally omits the penance commits sin, although the sins that were forgiven do not return.] To omit a penance for venial sins would be a venial sin; a serious penance for mortal sins would be grievous.

Receiving a penance is a great kindness as it affords us the opportunity to make reparation for the temporal punishment due to our sins.****
 
=WoundedIcon;7851561]I’m new to the church but I’m already catching on fast to some things that have gone wrong, namely in my first parish. But I want to run these things by you all to see if I’m right.
  • The deacon mentioned the universal priesthood and said people can bless things while mentioning that most people just have the priest bless rosaries because of his “authority”.
WELCOME HOME!😃

Priest do have powers and authorities not granted to the laity.

While people can and are encouraged to bless other people; we lack the authority to bless objects; thus for example turning a picture of a Saint into a 'Holy Card"; what we term a sacramental. [Things that can lead us to a closer relationship with God].

All religious items can be blessed making them a sacramental and a source of grace if used correctly.

Also A Eucharistic Minister OUGHT NOT to offer a Blessing to individuals durring Mass or Communion.
  • He also tempered my orthodoxy and said that Sola Scriptura is right for Protestants because it’s their tradition, that “it works for them” after I enumerated the doctrinal reasons for leaving Protestantism. I can’t reproduce exact phrasing and context, but it was clear he was leaning on some form of relativism.
Not necessarly a prudent teaching; but it is still a relative truth. Faith is and always will be a GIFT from God; NOT given to everyone. Therefore what one is taught can be judged in the light of limited understanding that God has a DIRECT Role in. SS is not biblical; BUT if it’s taught, believed and lived; and God grants no further Wisdom or Understanding associated with TRUE Faith; then God will judge their heart as he will ours. If thre is no Cupubable ignorance; God will not hold there lack of understanding as being their own fault.
  • He also tries to get me to work with the Lutheran pastor who baptized me and has told me that I’m safe from going to Hell now that I’m baptized.
Were you NOT Baptized in the Luthern tradition? Their Baptism is VALID if done with water in the Name of the Trinity. I’m not sure I understand you remark fully. Is he saying Once saved Always saved? And is it the former pastor or the Deacon making the statement?
  • The priest said that penance wasn’t a punishment to make up for sins, but that it was only a way to help me be a better Christian. It’s actually both though.
again the priest is RIGHT if correctly understood? Penance is not a direct repayment for our sins [rather it is ment to get us back on the right trak-relationship with God] IF YOU’D LIKE MORE INFOM ON THIS SENS ME A private message.There is a required payback for sins not covered here.
  • Although not necessarily always an abuse, the music is basically jazzy-pop OCA fare. Sometimes they replace the Responsorial Psalm with a cute hymn.
LORD HELP US JESUS:thumbsup:
  • I can’t lay it out perfectly, but when I follow along in the pew missal it’s near impossible because of all the jarring changes. Other people sit there with theirs though and act like everything’s fine, although I think I saw some of the new inductees get lost.
  • The priests have us raise our hands over candidates as a congregation in a priestly gesture to bless the candidates with them.
  • Not as big of a deal, but one priest has a habit of walking out into the congregation during the parish school masses.
Permissable as we welcome them into our Faith and Community and assure them of our prayers and support.
  • We did some visualizing meditation during an RCIA retreat >.>
File this under: If it worked GREAT; if not you not to do it again." No sin here.
Is this as bad as I’m thinking it is? because I’m a recent convert and I need to know if I somehow have wound up more orthodox than my clergy :eek: I need to know if I should report anything to the bishop and leave (I have no influence as a 21 y/o Inquirer.)
I and WE GREATLY appreciate your concerns but I don’t see a thing that the Bishop would react too in your post. And I AM A VERY TRADITIONAL IPRC.

If you have additioanl questions or concersn just send me a PM.

Welcome Home! And God Bless, you!

Pat
 
Well, when I saw the Latin Mass it was actually an OF Mass on Youtube.

😛 -does gimme hands at screen- 😛
 
I think I’m just gonna drop the issue, because I’m not making heads or tails of it right now. But I think I have to choose another parish as my home base, because I still feel like there’s a neon sign over my head that says “not from around here”. I moved here after finishing off high school in Columbus and I started to become very intellectual and cultured - kind of an gothy artsy gourmand - in that last year. The parish I attend is on the border of a steel mill town and some lower-end suburbs, sorta, so I feel way off there. I know I can’t run from the town as a whole, and every time I get close to moving out, over and over again the door slams in my face and the opportunity is incinerated in an inferno LOL. I really just want to be around more religiously conservative people, old or young. I asked the deacon and he told me I’m practically the only person there my age except for his children and like one other guy :eek: I mean, I’d love to do the saintly thing and stay there to offer a different viewpoint, maybe show some people a different perspective, but right now it’s wearing on my nerves.

I seriously am getting the impression that He wants me there. Ow, this oughta be interesting. Yeeeaaaaahh… call me prideful but I really think they need me. Like I said, one in like half a dozen college aged people there am I. :knight1:
 
=WoundedIcon;7857082]I think I’m just gonna drop the issue, because I’m not making heads or tails of it right now. But I think I have to choose another parish as my home base, because I still feel like there’s a neon sign over my head that says “not from around here”. I moved here after finishing off high school in Columbus and I started to become very intellectual and cultured - kind of an gothy artsy gourmand - in that last year. The parish I attend is on the border of a steel mill town and some lower-end suburbs, sorta, so I feel way off there. I know I can’t run from the town as a whole, and every time I get close to moving out, over and over again the door slams in my face and the opportunity is incinerated in an inferno LOL. I really just want to be around more religiously conservative people, old or young. I asked the deacon and he told me I’m practically the only person there my age except for his children and like one other guy :eek: I mean, I’d love to do the saintly thing and stay there to offer a different viewpoint, maybe show some people a different perspective, but right now it’s wearing on my nerves.
I seriously am getting the impression that He wants me there. Ow, this oughta be interesting. Yeeeaaaaahh… call me prideful but I really think they need me. Like I said, one in like half a dozen college aged people there am I. :knight1:
Mat GOD GUIDE your search.

If I’d known you were from Ohio I might have taken a slighly different slant on my last post.

Michigan [Detroit Area] and Cinncicatti were among the HOT BEDS of Progressive thought in the post Vatican II era. Thank God both have new Bishops and slow but sure progress is being made.

Still I encourage not to judge too quickly. Much od what we see in our churches is taught in the Seminaries; so there needs to be pryerful frlection on any actions considered.

God Bless,
Pat
 
Another problem… the whole congregation engages in the orans posture during the Our Father. :banghead:

And since it’s a confusion of priest and people’s gestures, it’s considered grave.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top