P
pensmama87
Guest
Doesn’t knowing “you’re getting graded on this” kind of kill the mood, too? 
Frankly I don’t do my best work under such circumstances.
Frankly I don’t do my best work under such circumstances.
Oh, is that a fact? It didn’t used to be such a problem in times past. But, then, marrying for emotional satisfaction and infatuation is a modern concept, not one adopted by any society previous to the romantics and troubadours.But we know that sex is a major issue that can make or break a marriage.
I agree with all those who say that newly-wed couples are pretty amateur when it comes to sex, and if commitment was based on this “trying out sex” experiences, most people would back away from the commitment.Of course the Bible says that sex outside of marriage is a sin.
But we know that sex is a major issue that can make or break a marriage. It is important for people to know what their partners like and don’t like in sex, and how much libido their partners have. We know that a marriage that is not open to life is also a sin, in Catholicism. We know that lack of sex, or bad sex, can ruin relationships and destroy marriages.
So practically speaking, despite what the Bible says, don’t people need to “test drive the car before they buy it,” in other words, have sex before marriage to test each other’s sexual compatibility? Isn’t it a foolish risk to not “test drive a car before buying it?” Wouldn’t it be a possible setup for failure to not have sex before marriage?
Let’s discuss.
Well now that makes more sense. At least you admit that certain amounts of background info can be helpful for some people.Second, even if we do allow for a “shopping” analogy, a more apt comparison would be a new house. I may go and check out a new house, but they sure won’t me live in it until I sign on the dotted line. And even if they did, living in it for one night isn’t honestly going to tell me much about the long term.
Uhh… you almost had me until this part. Like I was saying, you might think that’s wonderful. Not everybody would agree. And yeah, I’m definitely one of them.Oh, for the days when newly married couples didn’t even quite know how to “do it” and stumbled through the motions! What a beautiful discovery they could make together!
You make a lot of assumptions here. Studies generally show that finances, communication issues, adultery, alcohol or drug issues, etc. are common “reasons” people get divorced. I’ve never seen a study that suggested that “sexual incompatibility” makes or breaks a marriage.But we know that sex is a major issue that can make or break a marriage. It is important for people to know what their partners like and don’t like in sex, and how much libido their partners have. We know that a marriage that is not open to life is also a sin, in Catholicism. We know that lack of sex, or bad sex, can ruin relationships and destroy marriages.
But being a virgin =/= clueless sex.Well now that makes more sense. At least you admit that certain amounts of background info can be helpful for some people.
Now if only religious folks would stop acting like clueless sex couldn’t ever be a stupid thing. (At least, it sure is for certain personality types.)
You make a lot of assumptions here. Studies generally show that finances, communication issues, adultery, alcohol or drug issues, etc. are common “reasons” people get divorced. I’ve never seen a study that suggested that “sexual incompatibility” makes or breaks a marriage.
In addition, divorces don’t just happen in a vacuum. There are typically several factors going on that lead people there. Bad sex doesn’t destroy marriages- if you have a good marriage, you’re not going to have bad sex. But if you have a bad marriage to begin with, or other issues going on, that is going to affect your sex life.
And, as other posters have mentioned, sex in the beginning is not necessarily an indicator of how sex will always be. This goes both ways too- if it’s fantastic in the beginning, that can change, and if it’s awkward in the beginning, it can get a lot better. Those in good marriages recognize this and work together to please each other, keeping in mind that appearances change over time, various stressors come and go, and that their marriage and relationship does not depend entirely on sex.
I’d be willing to bet that most of the people on this thread advocating “test driving” are unmarried. I understand that it’s easy to get frustrated and tired of being single, but keeping sex in its proper perspective will lead you to a healthier marriage, not toward divorce.
People who test drive the car before marriage have something like quadruple the divorce rate.
So, which is it?Studies generally show that finances, communication issues, adultery, alcohol or drug issues, etc. are common “reasons” people get divorced.
Your potential spouse is not an object like a car, but a person made in the image and likeness of Christ. You do not “test drive” people. You do not use people as you would a car. Of course people are going to have different appetites, but that is what you get to work out with your spouse in your marriage.Of course the Bible says that sex outside of marriage is a sin.
But we know that sex is a major issue that can make or break a marriage. It is important for people to know what their partners like and don’t like in sex, and how much libido their partners have. We know that a marriage that is not open to life is also a sin, in Catholicism. We know that lack of sex, or bad sex, can ruin relationships and destroy marriages.
So practically speaking, despite what the Bible says, don’t people need to “test drive the car before they buy it,” in other words, have sex before marriage to test each other’s sexual compatibility? Isn’t it a foolish risk to not “test drive a car before buying it?” Wouldn’t it be a possible setup for failure to not have sex before marriage?
Let’s discuss.
Well stated.I have long found this to be a pretty insulting and not at all apt analogy.
First, my spouse is not a new car. I am not “buying” her. If I don’t know that I can live with her before I marry her, sex isn’t going to simplify my discernment process. It is only going to make it more complicated. Statistics back that up, too. Cohabitation and the like lead people to make worse marriage decisions, not better ones.
Second, even if we do allow for a “shopping” analogy, a more apt comparison would be a new house. I may go and check out a new house, but they sure won’t let me live in it until I sign on the dotted line. And even if they did, living in it for one night isn’t honestly going to tell me much about the long term.
I think the whole idea of “sexual compatibility” is way overblown. It’s not as though I would be passionately in love with my spouse and then mysteriously not enjoy having sex with her. Frankly, I don’t see how that would ever be possible.![]()
I’d be very interested in reading a study that claimed that people who “tried their spouses out first” so they would know if they were “compatible”, then married, were more likely to get divorced than people who did not feel the need to do a test-run. How they would measure “test-driving” versus all the other reasons people have premarital sex is beyond me.So, which is it?
Only assuming that specific types of sexual stimulus are so high on the priority list as to present a legitimate buffer to a relationship in the first place. Catholic living solves this problem for the fact that Catholic living is a mutual giving of one’s self to another. That mutual self-giving in a marital relationship significantly disintegrates the more self-centered aspects of the personalities involved, rendering those concerns relatively insignificant.Of course the Bible says that sex outside of marriage is a sin.
But we know that sex is a major issue that can make or break a marriage. It is important for people to know what their partners like and don’t like in sex, and how much libido their partners have. We know that a marriage that is not open to life is also a sin, in Catholicism. We know that lack of sex, or bad sex, can ruin relationships and destroy marriages.
So practically speaking, despite what the Bible says, don’t people need to “test drive the car before they buy it,” in other words, have sex before marriage to test each other’s sexual compatibility? Isn’t it a foolish risk to not “test drive a car before buying it?” Wouldn’t it be a possible setup for failure to not have sex before marriage?
Contrary to common place belief, the answer is no.Of course the Bible says that sex outside of marriage is a sin.
But we know that sex is a major issue that can make or break a marriage. It is important for people to know what their partners like and don’t like in sex, and how much libido their partners have. We know that a marriage that is not open to life is also a sin, in Catholicism. We know that lack of sex, or bad sex, can ruin relationships and destroy marriages.
So practically speaking, despite what the Bible says, don’t people need to “test drive the car before they buy it,” in other words, have sex before marriage to test each other’s sexual compatibility? Isn’t it a foolish risk to not “test drive a car before buying it?” Wouldn’t it be a possible setup for failure to not have sex before marriage?
Let’s discuss.
Clueless sex (I’m assuming you mean novice, unpracticed, first-timer sex) can be stupid, and awkward, and embarrassing, but the point of keeping it for marriage is that it’s something that you and your spouse will go through together. Rather than drive you apart, it will bind you through shared experience and learning. Although I was a virgin on my wedding night, as was my wife, the internet had pretty much done away with any of the mystery and surprise of sex; that loss is probably one of my greatest regrets because I didn’t get to fully experience that “newness” with my wife.Now if only religious folks would stop acting like clueless sex couldn’t ever be a stupid thing. (At least, it sure is for certain personality types.)
Uhh… you almost had me until this part. Like I was saying, you might think that’s wonderful. Not everybody would agree. And yeah, I’m definitely one of them.
Heck, I sooner long for the day when I give a Don Juan comeback to every guy that looked down on me for not getting laid as much as they were. Bonus if I did it with little to no actual sex. I’d be the kind of guy only very, very lucky girls would have and one occasional romp with me beats a thousand with those meatheads.
It’s sad that you don’t think that act of mutual discover is wonderful. As a fellow hardcore gaming nerd, geek and enthusiast (card, board, pen and paper, pc, console, live action, etc.), I understand how you feel about the comparisons. Most of my friends couldn’t believe I chose to wait, and it was exceptionally difficult to put up with the poking and prodding that did come from that decision. Fast forward a few years and I see my relationships in contrast to theirs, and I couldn’t be happier with my decision; the exclusivity and complete gift of the self; no baggage, no history, not wondering and comparing, just each other, wholly and completely; there’s nothing else like it.For me, THAT is what I’d want for a miracle.
I Corinthians 7:2 Although some translations use immorality in place of fornication the word used is porneia which is illicit sexual intercourse adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, intercourse with animals etc.There are quotes in the bible that condemn adultery–a married person having sex with someone other than their spouse–as a sin…but I can’t find a passage anywhere that specifies it is a sin for a couple to have sex before they are married.
Can you?
.