Praise and Worship choruses during Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter twosweetgirls
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
AMEN!

It always annoyed me that the only thing the youth of my parish were expected to sing was P&W. There is this assumption by adults that P&W is the only thing they WANT to sing so nothing else is offered to them. That is the equivalent only offering our kids candy because they happen to like candy. Yet if offered a variety of fruit and vegetables they find many that they really like.

I’ve tried suggesting that instead of segregating the youth to a once in a while so-called ‘Youth Mass’ (even when that’s the only Mass on a Sunday) they become part of the regular choir. I think it behooves ‘the choir’ to invite the young people to join them. Neither side was interested in what I had to say.
The key phrase is “Neither side was interested in what I had to say.”

Although many of the teenagers who post on CAF are interested in traditional things, especially music, most teenagers are not. I base this on my personal experience working with teenagers.

Some people say that if we offer it to them, they will come. No, they won’t. The “Renaissance Teen” is an exception rather than the rule.

Yes, of course continue to offer it, whether they are interested or not. I’m not proposing that we abandon attempts to expose teenagers and others to a more classical tradition. But don’t be surprised when the crowds of eager teenagers don’t show up for the Gregorian chant cantoring class.

Frankly, I wish they would show up. One of the priests who cantored one of the Masses that I played piano for last night chanted the Our Father–it was pathetic how few people knew what to sing. Most of us just recited the words along with him and the few people who do know the chant. I do wish that they would put up the music (notes) on the overhead–it is a lot less disruptive to my personal spirit of worship to be able to read music from an overhead than to stand there like a fool and mumble out a prayer because I don’t know the “melody”. But it’s not all about me, is it? If priests continue to chant without teaching people, soon it will be all about a few priests and a few congregants and that’s it.
 
The key phrase is “Neither side was interested in what I had to say.”

Although many of the teenagers who post on CAF are interested in traditional things, especially music, most teenagers are not. I base this on my personal experience working with teenagers.
But this was never put to the youth, it was the one adult who led their singing who didn’t want to sing anything else and had no interest in being in the choir.
 
I try to teach the kids from the grade school “Holy God we praise thy name” and other such hymns. They don’t like it. Its taken me about 15 classes to get them to be smooth in singing it because it is so awkward. They cheer when we close the books and open the pw folders. This is fact. They DO like PW more. They sing it well after hearing it only once.

Teenagers and young people in choir is a NIGHTMARE. …

I love teenagers. I’ve spent over 10 years as a youth minister, or heavily involved with them. This is not a matter of giving them enough credit. This is learned experience.
Although many of the teenagers who post on CAF are interested in traditional things, especially music, most teenagers are not. I base this on my personal experience working with teenagers.

Some people say that if we offer it to them, they will come. No, they won’t. The “Renaissance Teen” is an exception rather than the rule.

Yes, of course continue to offer it, whether they are interested or not. I’m not proposing that we abandon attempts to expose teenagers and others to a more classical tradition. But don’t be surprised when the crowds of eager teenagers don’t show up for the Gregorian chant cantoring class.

Frankly, I wish they would show up. One of the priests who cantored one of the Masses that I played piano for last night chanted the Our Father–it was pathetic how few people knew what to sing. Most of us just recited the words along with him and the few people who do know the chant. I do wish that they would put up the music (notes) on the overhead–it is a lot less disruptive to my personal spirit of worship to be able to read music from an overhead than to stand there like a fool and mumble out a prayer because I don’t know the “melody”. But it’s not all about me, is it? If priests continue to chant without teaching people, soon it will be all about a few priests and a few congregants and that’s it.
I was recently commenting to someone that I was glad this hadn’t descended into another thread where we were being told what music teenagers wanted at Mass, but I suppose it was too much to hope that that would last.

Firstly agapewolf, you say you ‘try’ to teach them it, but isn’t it just possible that you aren’t very good at teaching that genre of hymns or are better at teaching P&W? Or maybe the fact that you have a preference, or find it difficult to ‘try’ to teach them one when they can just sing P&W stuff without much effort on your part shows in your approach/attitude and they pick up on that?

Perhaps you’ve forgotten, “We do these things not because they are easy but because they are hard”. If you are to be an effective teacher then you should be bridging that gap, encouraging and showing them why it is worth putting in the effort, if you are not doing that or are unable to do that then maybe you shouldn’t be teaching, or trying to teach, them it. We don’t let children only do their favourite subject in school, we don’t let them eat only their favourite food. We don’t let them only practice the skill they are best at, because if we do that they will never discover what else they are good at, enjoy or what they could be best of all at.

If they enjoy something enough they’ll make the time, if they don’t they’ll find ways to avoid it. Maybe they’re not as enamored with the P&W as you think, if they were they’d find the time to get there.

Experience working with teenagers is not the same as being one, thinking you know what they want/think or thinking you know the way in which they think is not the same as knowing. And both of you have made comments which to my mind show that you don’t seem to understand that distinction.

Most teenagers are not Catholic, most have lukewarm interest in their faith if any, most know very little about their faith to the extent where it is very confusing/difficult to see if they even have one. Would we prefer it if all teenagers were like that, or if they were all interested in their Catholic faith and loyal to the Magisterium?

The fact is of those who have bothered themselves with finding out about their faith as Catholics a sizeable proportion find an interest in elements of tradition which have been lost by previous generations and which they would like to see restored. Often it is from finding out about those things which now have been clouded in mystery because of the extent to which they were once common and have now been erased do they find what they have been looking for in their faith. What they might otherwise have thought was absent or wasn’t there at all, when in fact it was there all along, just not in the Homilies they heard or the P&W style hymns they had to sing.

Teenagers want more than superficiality, and far too often that is the only thing which they see at Mass. No one has told them about the Communion of Saints, so they don’t see it. No one has told them about standing at the Foot of the Cross so they don’t see that. No one has told them about the Church Triumphant, Suffering or Militant, so they don’t see that. If they come to Mass and all they see is a scaled down rock band, neutered of the speakers they’d have at a nightclub, playing what are second rate tunes from the genre they might normally listen to then is it any wonder they stop seeing the point in going to Mass?

The life of the Church, living as faithful Catholics, is radically different to the life society offers to teenagers. It’s also a much harder life to lead, it is counter cultural in almost every way, putting the things of the world to comes ahead of those in the present etc. The way we participate in it, particularly at Mass, should also be radically different to the way we’d live our day to day lives, the way we experience it should also transcend the things of this world, not cave in to pressure to pack pews as some seem to think.
 
Which brings a ultimate question. If your stndards are so strict that those who lean towards your point of view decide not to pack your pew but spend that time doing something else have you gained or lost?

As for me I’m on my way to church and when I play my bass in praise and worship I do pray that my efforts bring more people into worship then we drive away from worshiping God.
 
Don’t get me wrong - I don’t like “praise and worship” music at mass much either, but I don’t understand what’s so bad about it. Is it the lyrics that are inappropriate for mass or the musical style of the songs or the hand raising that sometimes accompanies theses songs? Or a combination of those things or something else entirely?
 
I was recently commenting to someone that I was glad this hadn’t descended into another thread where we were being told what music teenagers wanted at Mass, but I suppose it was too much to hope that that would last.

Firstly agapewolf, you say you ‘try’ to teach them it, but isn’t it just possible that you aren’t very good at teaching that genre of hymns or are better at teaching P&W? Or maybe the fact that you have a preference, or find it difficult to ‘try’ to teach them one when they can just sing P&W stuff without much effort on your part shows in your approach/attitude and they pick up on that?

Perhaps you’ve forgotten, “We do these things not because they are easy but because they are hard”. If you are to be an effective teacher then you should be bridging that gap, encouraging and showing them why it is worth putting in the effort, if you are not doing that or are unable to do that then maybe you shouldn’t be teaching, or trying to teach, them it. We don’t let children only do their favourite subject in school, we don’t let them eat only their favourite food. We don’t let them only practice the skill they are best at, because if we do that they will never discover what else they are good at, enjoy or what they could be best of all at.

If they enjoy something enough they’ll make the time, if they don’t they’ll find ways to avoid it. Maybe they’re not as enamored with the P&W as you think, if they were they’d find the time to get there.

Experience working with teenagers is not the same as being one, thinking you know what they want/think or thinking you know the way in which they think is not the same as knowing. And both of you have made comments which to my mind show that you don’t seem to understand that distinction.

Most teenagers are not Catholic, most have lukewarm interest in their faith if any, most know very little about their faith to the extent where it is very confusing/difficult to see if they even have one. Would we prefer it if all teenagers were like that, or if they were all interested in their Catholic faith and loyal to the Magisterium?

The fact is of those who have bothered themselves with finding out about their faith as Catholics a sizeable proportion find an interest in elements of tradition which have been lost by previous generations and which they would like to see restored. Often it is from finding out about those things which now have been clouded in mystery because of the extent to which they were once common and have now been erased do they find what they have been looking for in their faith. What they might otherwise have thought was absent or wasn’t there at all, when in fact it was there all along, just not in the Homilies they heard or the P&W style hymns they had to sing.

Teenagers want more than superficiality, and far too often that is the only thing which they see at Mass. No one has told them about the Communion of Saints, so they don’t see it. No one has told them about standing at the Foot of the Cross so they don’t see that. No one has told them about the Church Triumphant, Suffering or Militant, so they don’t see that. If they come to Mass and all they see is a scaled down rock band, neutered of the speakers they’d have at a nightclub, playing what are second rate tunes from the genre they might normally listen to then is it any wonder they stop seeing the point in going to Mass?

The life of the Church, living as faithful Catholics, is radically different to the life society offers to teenagers. It’s also a much harder life to lead, it is counter cultural in almost every way, putting the things of the world to comes ahead of those in the present etc. The way we participate in it, particularly at Mass, should also be radically different to the way we’d live our day to day lives, the way we experience it should also transcend the things of this world, not cave in to pressure to pack pews as some seem to think.
Of course…no one can even trust someone’s experience. Why can’t for the sake of discussion, I not be accused of some further agenda? My experience is my experience…

I’m telling the truth, and it has nothing to do with my “effectiveness” of a teacher…and your statement is insulting. Without any evidence you do not have a right to say such. Your second guessing my “attitude” when teaching is also insulting, AND very incorrect. I have stated before, I LIKE ALL music.

I Love Holy God… and i talk it up, but it is STILL VERY DIFFICULT to learn.
The kids don’t like it.

And that is not a very good reason anyway…just to “pick up on” a teacher not liking something so they wouldn’t like it? Please…maybe a little bit, but it wouldnt’ pose as a general rule.

I’ve purposely stayed out of this discussion and I am trying to continue to do so because I am so tired of it, but when I see such claims, I must contribute with my learned experience.
 
Of course…no one can even trust someone’s experience. Why can’t for the sake of discussion, I not be accused of some further agenda? My experience is my experience…

I’m telling the truth, and it has nothing to do with my “effectiveness” of a teacher…and your statement is insulting. Without any evidence you do not have a right to say such. Your second guessing my “attitude” when teaching is also insulting, AND very incorrect. I have stated before, I LIKE ALL music.

I Love Holy God… and i talk it up, but it is STILL VERY DIFFICULT to learn.
The kids don’t like it.

And that is not a very good reason anyway…just to “pick up on” a teacher not liking something so they wouldn’t like it? Please…maybe a little bit, but it wouldnt’ pose as a general rule.

I’ve purposely stayed out of this discussion and I am trying to continue to do so because I am so tired of it, but when I see such claims, I must contribute with my learned experience.
We could do, but given that we don’t you from Adam it may not be a good idea to do so. Your experience may be entirely fictional, even if it is as you say then it may only hold for your Parish, one out of however many thousand in the U.S. But for the sake of argument lets assume that your experience is valid, albeit for only your Parish/Parishes. What you have said doesn’t have all that much to do with your experience so much as your interpretation of your experience which may or may not be valid.

No it isn’t, you just choose to take it as such. I’ve not said that you are a bad teacher, I’ve simply put it forward as a possibility, another interpretation if you will. I’ve not made a statement requiring evidence, you on the other hand expect us to take your experience, and apparently your interpretation of events as being valid without any evidence. Do you have any evidence that you are a good teacher, for example? Or that your experience is valid? Given that you’ve not offered evidence for any of those, and your entire argument is founded upon them, perhaps it is a good idea not to be throwing stones in your glasshouse.

I’ve met a lot of teachers, some of whom were very good others who… weren’t so good. The good ones may have known they were good teachers, but I’ve never met one, either good or bad, that thought they were bad. That’s just my experience of course, but I suppose you’ll just need to accept that.

I’ve played some pieces on the flute which were very difficult by some standards but very easy by others, and some which were easy by any standard. I suppose if my teachers had followed your philosophy I’d still be playing the last kind, fortunately they didn’t.

That’s your interpretation of course, no proof for it yet, I suppose? Now another interpretation is that they may have had a bad teacher, maybe their teacher just wasn’t in a very good mood, or was thinking about how “Teenagers and young people in choir is a NIGHTMARE” or their teacher may just have not been good at teaching that hymn. Those are alternative interpretations, and with no evidence one way or another they are just as valid as any other. They are just as likely to be true, your experience may indicate one thing another person’s something entirely different.

My experience for example is that if a teacher labelled something as ‘very difficult’ it often was more difficult than if they had just given it and told me to have a go. That’s a matter of a psychological reaction to their teacher’s attitude. My experience is that if a teacher took a negative view of what someone was/wasn’t capable of, or simply caved in to doing what was easy is that the students didn’t enjoy it and didn’t progress very much if at all. But that’s my experience.

I’m fairly certain it is a general rule, if someone’s first impression of something/someone is negative then they’re aware of it and it influences their perception of it/them, how they think of it/them, react to it/them etc. For example, if the first impression that an employer gets of a prospective employee is that their a lazy good for nothing it’s fairly doubtful they’ll get the job even if they do reasonably well in all the other components.

But it hasn’t stopped you putting your oar in a few times, have we got that comparison of P&W and Gregorian Chant yet by the way, assuming it existed in the first place obviously? You contribute with your interpretation of your experience, it isn’t the same thing and it doesn’t make your position any more valid than anyone else.
 
My opinions have formed From my experience, not the other way around. I offer some simple experiences…and your attempt to tear them down by discrediting me as a teacher or putting agendas in my head that didn’t exist are unfair and actually, quite the usual thing for this board. WHich is why I grow weary. For some reason, it seams to be fear or some other thing, that one might actually be proven wrong, it won’t even be allowed to stand for the sake of discussion.

Holy God is textbook difficult…merely because of its wordiness, and then some…this isn’t my “interpretation”. This is fact. My choir…which sings all types of music has a difficult time with it, and they know it from years past.

Your snipe attempts as discrediting me bear no fruit here.

It is not easy to find my past attempts at a comparison, and I have no obligation to do so here. As I said before, I didn’t want to be a part of this conversation in the first place, as it is obvious that people here only purposely twist anything I might say or not even allow some basics to be understood…just even for the sake of discussion.

Again, your snipe jabs at trying to push buttons in order for me to take bait or such also does no good. I’m tired. It does no good here.
 
Holy God is textbook difficult…merely because of its wordiness, and then some…this isn’t my “interpretation”. This is fact. My choir…which sings all types of music has a difficult time with it, and they know it from years past.
Are we talking about

Holy God we praise thy name
Lord above we bow before thee…

one of the few hymns sung with gusto by my parish??
 
Are we talking about

Holy God we praise thy name
Lord above we bow before thee…

one of the few hymns sung with gusto by my parish??
Yes…and it is sung well at most parishes, including mine…but the kids don’t know it yet and it is textbook difficult.

Wordy, lots of consonants and unfamiliar vocabulary, words that do not flow together, words all crammed into small phrases, quick turning intervals, etc.

Again, I LIKE the song, I talk it up when I teach it. It is very awkward to sing…as I said, my choir knows it from days of old, yet has a difficult time and flubs over some words.
 
So, snhs, tell us your musical qualifications.
Yes, that would be interesting.

JMO. I think that I Timothy 5: 1 & 2 is applicable here, also Deuteronomy 32: 7.

Not that snhs has asked me, but I have won two Park District awards for my work with children and teenagers in our city–this may not sound like a big deal, but it is here.

When I was privileged to lead a children’s choir/drama group (not just play piano for it), it grew from 24 children to over 60 in just two years.

Last week I was invited to write a fiction story for a teenaged magazine about the Olympics. In her note to me, the editor said, “You are the only one that I want to write it.”

I have a stack of letters and notes from children and teenagers thanking me for my work with them on various musical projects in the community. Most of their notes comment on my “encouragement of and belief in their abilities.”

Two years ago, I was invited to chair the local classical music youth competition (children and teenagers), mainly because of my reputation among musical people in this city for being “good at working with kids.”

And my own daughters, who are now grown, rise up and called me blessed! That’s probably the most precious “proof” of my accumen with children and teenagers.

I personally don’t think “being a teenager” is necessarily evidence that someone knows a lot about other teenagers. By that argument, a priest should never counsel married couples because he isn’t married to a woman.

A teacher like agapewolf has the opportunity to work with a wide spectrum of teenagers and children. This gives the teacher a large sample size to draw conclusions from. A large sample size generally means more accurate results.

snhs, personal experience is considered valid enough to be accepted in a court of law. When a lawyer calls you up to the witness stand, he doesn’t ask you to present “proofs.” He asks you to tell the court “what happened,” in other words, your personal experience. And that personal experience is accepted into the body of evidence that will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt guilt or innocence.

My suggestion is that you stop disparaging the personal experience of others. Start listening to what others say, especially those who are older than you, and start learning from their lives and situations. That’s one reason why people come to this or any other online message board–to hear what others have to say and possibly apply their experiences, knowledge, and wisdom to their own situation.

I have to say that I agree with what agapewolf has stated when it comes to kids and music. There are the occasional outliers who defy their peers and teen culture and embrace traditionalism, classicalism, and the ancient ways. But most teenagers are not like this, and they don’t fall for attempts to “raise them up” to a “higher standard” because they don’t accept that a different way is necessarily “higher.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top