So let us look at the verse… The verse talks about the righteousness of GOD through faith in JESUS for all those who believe. Obviously he is talking about everyone BUT God / Jesus (since that is his topic) if you read this thoroughly:
Romans 3:22-24
"even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe; for there is no distinction; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus;
As far as can she be full of grace AND be a sinner, please read this scripture…
Acts 6:8
“And Stephen, FULL OF GRACE and power, was performing great wonders and signs among the people.”
Was Stephen now also without sin? Absolutely not!
Please understand I am not out to bash anyone’s belief system. I am just a firm believer that God’s Word is truth and the truth will set you free…
The following is a quote (with minor changes in punctuation) from a prior thread which discussed this very topic. My computer won’t allow me to cut and paste Greek letters so this is the best I can do. For more info please follow the link. This is the way the original Greek refers to Stephen:
“stefanoV de plhrhV caritoV kai dunamewV epoiei terata kai shmeia megala en tw law.”
The focus of the verb is the word “epoiei” which is a verb that is imperfect tense. This is still a past tense verb so the verse is still talking of an action that is no longer happening, but it is a progressive. It can be translated as, “was doing”. The entire verse can be translated literally as:
“Stephen, but full of grace and strength, was doing miracles and great signs among the people.”
This is speaking of something that was being done sometime in the past but is not being done now.
Here is somewhat how the Greek would be pronounced:
“stephanos de playrais charitos kai dunamaos epoiei terata kai saimaya megala en to lao.”
The imperfect tense is past time just like the pluperfect.
It is specifically speaking of something in the past. Stephen was full of grace at the time when doing the great works, but it does not say he is still full of Grace. Whereas in the Mary passage it continues into the present.
Luke 1:28 reads:
“kai eiselqwn proV authn eipen, caire, kecaritwmenh, o kurioV meta sou.”
The word “kecaritwmenh” is used here. This is a perfect passive participle. It is also feminine. A participle is a verb that is used to describe the subject. The perfect tense describes an action in present time which has a completed aspect. In this verse it is used as a title and means basically “you who have been graced” or “you who have been filled with grace”. This word is not speaking of just a little grace, it is speaking of an abundance of grace. Although this is a completed action, the effects are still on going in this verse. Mary is still full of grace when the angel says this.
This is somewhat how the Greek is pronounced:
“kai eiselthone pros autain eipen, chaire, kecharitomenay, o kurios meta sou.”
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=55634
(thank you, Jimmy!!)
To sum it up, the original Greek uses different terms to refer to Mary and Stephen. When it is used as referring to Mary, the term is a title. The Angel Gabriel came to Mary and said “Hail, Full of Grace…” This it not used as a title when it refers to Stephen.
The term “full of grace” does not mean the same when it is used as referring to Stephen and when it is used as referring to Mary.