President of the Evangelical Theological Society to become Catholic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qwikness
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Evangelical Theological Society
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Evangelical Theological Society is a professional society of Biblical scholars, educators, pastors, and students to serve Jesus and his church by advancing evangelical scholarship. It was established in 1949 in Cincinnati. The number of members in 2005 was over 4,200. Members range from many different denominational or theological backgrounds but all, as evangelicals, unite under the following two doctrinal points:

“The Bible alone, and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God written and is therefore inerrant in the autographs. God is a Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, each an uncreated person, one in essence, equal in power and glory.”
Full, voting membership is available to anyone with a Master of Theology (Th.M.) degree or its equivalent, and who subscribe to the above doctrinal statement. Interested evangelicals who do not have such a degree can apply for associate membership, but do not have voting rights. There is also a student membership.

The society produces the Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society (JETS) which contains scholarly articles and book reviews from various evangelical perspectives.
 
It shows that the pontificate of Benedict XVI is bearing it’s fruit. 🙂

This man is far more holier than John Paul II ever was. Seriously, I’m not joking when I say this. I mean that with the up most sincerity.
 
It shows that the pontificate of Benedict XVI is bearing it’s fruit. 🙂

This man is far more holier than John Paul II ever was. Seriously, I’m not joking when I say this. I mean that with the up most sincerity.
I think it is sort of crass to compare the holiness of John Paul II with that of Benedict XVI. From what I can tell, they are/were both very holy men. You may disagree with their doctrinal viewpoints, but their holiness? 😦
 
In Dr. Beckwith’s own words…
rightreason.ektopos.com/archives/2007/05/my_return_to_th.html
The past four months have moved quickly for me and my wife. As you probably know, my work in philosophy, ethics, and theology has always been Catholic friendly, but I would have never predicted that I would return to the Church, for there seemed to me too many theological and ecclesiastical issues that appeared insurmountable. However, in January, at the suggestion of a dear friend, I began reading the Early Church Fathers as well as some of the more sophisticated works on justification by Catholic authors. I became convinced that the Early Church is more Catholic than Protestant and that the Catholic view of justification, correctly understood, is biblically and historically defensible. Even though I also believe that the Reformed view is biblically and historically defensible, I think the Catholic view has more explanatory power to account for both all the biblical texts on justification as well as the church’s historical understanding of salvation prior to the Reformation all the way back to the ancient church of the first few centuries. Moreover, much of what I have taken for granted as a Protestant—e.g., the catholic creeds, the doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation, the Christian understanding of man, and the canon of Scripture—is the result of a Church that made judgments about these matters and on which non-Catholics, including Evangelicals, have declared and grounded their Christian orthodoxy in a world hostile to it. Given these considerations, I thought it wise for me to err on the side of the Church with historical and theological continuity with the first generations of Christians that followed Christ’s Apostles.
 
I think it is sort of crass to compare the holiness of John Paul II with that of Benedict XVI. From what I can tell, they are/were both very holy men. You may disagree with their doctrinal viewpoints, but their holiness? 😦
I agree it is certainly crass to compare the holiness of John Paul II and Benedict XVI .😦

Trick
 
I had never heard of the ETS before but I thought their statement was fair and reflected Christian brotherhood. Not all Evangelicals do so with regard to the Church. I particularly liked the part about Evangelicals and Catholics standing together on the social issues that are so important today.
 
I agree it is certainly crass to compare the holiness of John Paul II and Benedict XVI .😦

Trick
I like John Paul II too. I think Benedict XVI is the holiest Pope we’ve had since Pius XII. Why? For the past four years I’ve sought action from American Catholic bishops that would result in a unanimous commitment to enforce Canon 915, thereby denying the body of Christ to any public figure who persists in support of any kind for the act of abortion. Another, Benedict gave the speech at Regensburg in September of last year, didn’t John Paul do that did we? Not in my experience.
He could initiate the moto proprio that could allow more use of the Triditine Mass. Those are my personal reasons and I’m sticking to them.
 
This JP2 or Benedict is off topic-WAAAAYYY off topic. Start a new thread please.
 
I had never heard of the ETS before but I thought their statement was fair and reflected Christian brotherhood. Not all Evangelicals do so with regard to the Church. I particularly liked the part about Evangelicals and Catholics standing together on the social issues that are so important today.
I think you are confusing ETS (Evangelical Theological Society) with ECT (Evangelicals and Catholics Together).

But maybe not. Because ETS statement reflects what you posted.
 
In Dr. Beckwith’s own words…

Moreover, much of what I have taken for granted as a Protestant—e.g., the catholic creeds, the doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation, the Christian understanding of man, and the canon of Scripture—is the result of a Church that made judgments about these matters and on which non-Catholics, including Evangelicals, have declared and grounded their Christian orthodoxy in a world hostile to it. Given these considerations, I thought it wise for me to err on the side of the Church with historical and theological continuity with the first generations of Christians that followed Christ’s Apostles.
This is the part that makes me wonder why some Protestants are so hostile toward the Catholic Church.
 
Oh my gosh! This makes me appreciate Marcus Grodi all the more. If I were in his(MG’s) position I would be ending the Journey Home program with something like “You won’t believe who is coming into the church. . .!”
 
This is the part that makes me wonder why some Protestants are so hostile toward the Catholic Church.
I have found that the ones that are hostile toward the Catholic Church are usually ex-Catholics, and not generally people who were raised Protestant. Often, the issues center around authority and are disguised as theological ones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top