Presidential Debate Moderators Announced

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Abyssinia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Who would be more impartial that those selected? More from FOX Network, the mouthpiece of the GOP? Maybe Sean Hannity?
 
how bout half and half?
what percentage do you consider fair?
how bout we don’t play “gotcha” and just ask questions about policy… plans…???
 
adowcday said:
Who would be more impartial that those selected? More from FOX Network, the mouthpiece of the GOP? Maybe Sean Hannity?
Click to expand...
Less from CNN or MSNBC or ABC or NBC all mouth pieces for the dems undeniable!
 
petra22 said:
how bout half and half?
what percentage do you consider fair?
how bout we don’t play “gotcha” and just ask questions about policy… plans…???
Click to expand...
No “gotcha” games would be ideal, but I hold out little hope that that will happen. What I do hope happens is that when one of the mods starts to go down that road, he/she gets a verbal smackdown.
 
No mention of whether the candidates have agreed to these terms.
 
I’m more concerned with the statements of the candidates than any perception of partiality by the moderators…the moderators have nothing to do with the answers…they don’t even have anything to do with how the answers are interpreted.

Let’s be real…in July, those who were for Clinton or for Trump we
re set in stone, and nothing found out about either candidate is going to change their minds…and even here on CAF, you can see the majority are for one over the other.

The outcome is going to be determined by those making up their mind almost the moment they walk into the voting booth.

So anything said here, by any of us, is irrelevant.
 
Neofight said:
Let’s be real…in July, those who were for Clinton or for Trump we
re set in stone, and nothing found out about either candidate is going to change their minds…and even here on CAF, you can see the majority are for one over the other.

The outcome is going to be determined by those making up their mind almost the moment they walk into the voting booth.

So anything said here, by any of us, is irrelevant.
Click to expand...
Yup. Pretty much.
 
Maybe get rid of the moderators and just let the candidates respond to questions from the audience. 🙂
 
Neofight said:
I’m more concerned with the statements of the candidates than any perception of partiality by the moderators…the moderators have nothing to do with the answers…they don’t even have anything to do with how the answers are interpreted.
Click to expand...
Except when Candy Crowley “corrects” candidates with false information.
 
Michael68 said:
At least Chris Wallace gets the final one!
Click to expand...
Maybe by then, voters will have made up their minds. I actually think though because the bar is set so low for Donald Trump, if he can reel himself in and act even somewhat Presidential for 90 minutes, that the public might think he isn’t so bad no matter how well Hillary does. Of course the Clinton camp has a lot of footage of him not acting Presidential.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top