T
tabycat
Guest
If you do not like the poll (it says you are not 60 percent over the other side) attack!!! :bounce::banghead:
- Status
C
ccmnxc
Guest
Assuming itās not already rigged.
A
anilorak13ska
Guest
So, am I understanding correctly that itās not so much the casting of the vote itself that is a moral or immoral act (depending on the candidate), since voting itself is a civic duty and maybe neutral morally at worst, or a moral duty at best, but the fact is that we vote for a reason, and that reason is what ought to be moralā¦ so voting in such a way that the expected outcome is moral makes that choice moral? If so, thanks, that makes sense to me 
A
_Abyssinia
Guest
Poll: Obama, Romney tied in New Hampshire
The Romney Scenario
Daily kos/seiu poll: Romney beats Obama 50 - 46
GOP has gained momentum in Iowa since absentee ballots available
Gallup: Romney leads Obama 50 - 46
Romney wins in a landslide ā Las Vegas oddsmaker doubles down on prediction
The Romney Scenario
Romney Closing In On Obama In Pennsylvania, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Casey-Smith Senate Race Too Close To Call
Daily kos/seiu poll: Romney beats Obama 50 - 46
GOP has gained momentum in Iowa since absentee ballots available
Gallup: Romney leads Obama 50 - 46
Romney wins in a landslide ā Las Vegas oddsmaker doubles down on prediction
E
estesbob
Guest
Yes
L
Luigi_Daniele
Guest
V
Vangaurdian
Guest
Romney signed Commonwealth Healthcare into law.
Commonwealth Healthcare included tax payer funded abortion.
Voting for either Obama or Romney is voting for evil.
Your vote is wasted either way.
Goldman Sachs is the winner. Goldman Sachs is pro-abortion.
To state āthird party cannot winā is surrendering to evil.
Do not surrender democracy. Vote your conscience.
No sincere Catholic would vote for Romney or Obama
āThe price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil menā
Do you want to be ruled by Goldman Sachs?
Vote Pro-Life, vote Virgil Goode.
Commonwealth Healthcare included tax payer funded abortion.
Voting for either Obama or Romney is voting for evil.
Your vote is wasted either way.
Goldman Sachs is the winner. Goldman Sachs is pro-abortion.
To state āthird party cannot winā is surrendering to evil.
Do not surrender democracy. Vote your conscience.
No sincere Catholic would vote for Romney or Obama
āThe price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil menā
Do you want to be ruled by Goldman Sachs?
Vote Pro-Life, vote Virgil Goode.
R
rlg94086
Guest
:yawn:
V
Vangaurdian
Guest
Again,
āThe price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil menā
Do you want to be ruled by Goldman Sachs?
R
rlg94086
Guest
Iām not indifferent. Iām an informed voter.
āruled by Goldman Sachs?ā :yawn:
V
Vangaurdian
Guest
Your charity and knowledge of how much Goldman Sachs has to play in this farce of an election is very telling of your āinformedā status.
R
rlg94086
Guest
Iām very familiar with Goldman Sachsā campaign contribution history. Iām sure voting for Virgil Goode will make you feel good, and that is what is important.
V
Vangaurdian
Guest
And voting for a former governor who signed into law tax payer funded abortion makes you feel good?Iām very familiar with Goldman Sachsā campaign contribution history. Iām sure voting for Virgil Goode will make you feel good, and that is what is important.
One who claims to be Pro-Life in 2004 then gives tax payer money to planned parenthood in 2007?
boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/12/29/romney_officials_approved_clinic_loan/
A person who designates a seat for planned parenthood at taxpayer expense?:
malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleII/Chapter6a/Section16m
R
rlg94086
Guest
All those points have been discussed ad nauseum. I have no interest in going over previously tread ground. Vote for your loser. It is a free country.
V
Vangaurdian
Guest
Iām going to vote my conscience.
I pray that any Goldman Sachs supporters have a moment of conscience and decide to vote Pro-Life.
Romney is not Pro-Life.
Obama is not Pro-Life.
Goldman Sachs is not Pro-Lifeā¦
R
rlg94086
Guest
Iām voting my conscience, as well.
My conscience wonāt allow me to waste my vote on a candidate that will garner less than 1% of the vote and therefore affect no change. You, of course, can vote as you like. Romney is a much, much better choice than Obama from a life perspective, so I will vote to limit evil. Your vote will do what? Oh yeahā¦nothing.
I
ishii
Guest
Well, Vanguardian - my conscience wonāt let me abandon the unborn in a fit of perfectionism and misplaced hatred of Wallstreet money. Another twenty years of Roe V Wade being the law of the land will result in millions of abortions. Are you okay with that? Saving unborn lives by giving states the right to outlaw abortion is more important to me than voting for a fringe candidate out of spite.
Ishii
M
markomalley
Guest
From GallupRINCETON, NJ ā Half of likely voters now prefer Mitt Romney for president and 46% back President Barack Obama in Gallup interviewing through Monday.
While Romneyās four-percentage-point advantage is not statistically significant, he has consistently edged ahead of Obama each of the past several days in Gallupās seven-day rolling averages conducted entirely after the Oct. 3 presidential debate. Prior to that debate ā regarded as a decisive Romney win by political experts and Americans who watched it ā Romney averaged less than a one-point lead over Obama among likely voters.
http://i.imm.io/IefM.png
Interestingly enough, are the internals reported in this poll with the comparison to 2008:
http://i.imm.io/Ieg2.png
If I was in the Obama camp, I would be panicking right around now. While Obama did better last night than in the first debate (he, at least, was conscious and a participant last night), his participation would primarily bolster the morale of people already in his camp. I really donāt think he didnāt do well enough to change anybodyās mind in his favor.
So I wonder how long it will take the Obama proxies to attack the Gallup organization this time? (You know the tacticā¦attack the messenger)
My piece of advice for Obama supporters. Heed the poll, but donāt attack it. The best way for you Obama supporters to prove Gallup wrong is to show up at the polls on November 7th!!!
RINCETON, NJ ā Half of likely voters now prefer Mitt Romney for president and 46% back President Barack Obama in Gallup interviewing through Monday.While Romneyās four-percentage-point advantage is not statistically significant, he has consistently edged ahead of Obama each of the past several days in Gallupās seven-day rolling averages conducted entirely after the Oct. 3 presidential debate. Prior to that debate ā regarded as a decisive Romney win by political experts and Americans who watched it ā Romney averaged less than a one-point lead over Obama among likely voters.
http://i.imm.io/IefM.png
Interestingly enough, are the internals reported in this poll with the comparison to 2008:
http://i.imm.io/Ieg2.png
If I was in the Obama camp, I would be panicking right around now. While Obama did better last night than in the first debate (he, at least, was conscious and a participant last night), his participation would primarily bolster the morale of people already in his camp. I really donāt think he didnāt do well enough to change anybodyās mind in his favor.
So I wonder how long it will take the Obama proxies to attack the Gallup organization this time? (You know the tacticā¦attack the messenger)
My piece of advice for Obama supporters. Heed the poll, but donāt attack it. The best way for you Obama supporters to prove Gallup wrong is to show up at the polls on November 7th!!!
J
jwakja
Guest
Iām still at disbelief when I hear women on the call in stations defending abortion as their right! How must God look at such women knowing He is the creator of all life and having them spit in his face with the arrogance and pride to tell God what they want and will do. By voting for Obama them are in actuality insulting God by supporting a āpersonā who supports such atrocities! VOTE ROMNEY!!!
- Status