Priest uses chalice to bring home immigration issue to bishops

  • Thread starter Thread starter JPUSC
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JPUSC

Guest
Priest uses chalice to bring home immigration issue to bishops

Catholic News Service June 17, 2017

During the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ spring assembly in Indianapolis the issue of migrants and refugees was front and center. The commissions and groups instituted by the bishops have been committed in recent years to addressing rising concerns about immigration policy and the lack of one.

INDIANAPOLIS - Holy Cross Father Daniel Groody stood before the U.S. bishops June 14 and held up a chalice. It was not special in appearance, but rather in the story it told.

The chalice was handcrafted primarily with wood from a refugee boat that landed upon the beaches of Lampedusa, the Mediterranean island from which Pope Francis cast a wreath into the waters to remember the thousands of refugees who lost their lives there, attempting to flee persecution.

The base of the chalice was formed from mesquite, a common wood along the U.S.-Mexico border crossed by immigrants seeking better lives in America.

Together, he said, the materials of the chalice speak to the plight of immigrants, a topic addressed during the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ spring assembly in Indianapolis.

“Migration is an incredibly, incredibly complex issue, and those who don’t realize its complexity either aren’t listening, or they don’t understand,” said Groody, an associate professor of theology at the University of Notre Dame and director of immigration initiatives at the university’s Institute for Latino Studies.

“And second, migration is an incredibly, incredibly simple issue, and those who don’t realize its simplicity either aren’t listening, or they don’t understand,” he said.

Along those lines of duality, Groody noted the need to “move people beyond binary language: legal or illegal, citizen or alien, native or foreigner, and to try to go to the deeper river of these issues."

He spoke of the tensions in the topic of immigration, the tension between sovereign rights and human rights, between civil law and natural law, and between national security and human security.

Groody’s reflection preceded a review by the working group on migrants and refugees created out of the bishops’ general assembly last November.

The group was to complete its work by this spring meeting, but “recognizing the continued urgency” so many migration and refugee issues present, Cardinal Daniel N. Dinardo of Galveston-Houston, USCCB president, announced June 15 he was extending the group…

Gomez noted that part of the reason the group was created last November was the bishops’ “desire for a strong response to the anticipated policies of the incoming administration regarding refugees and immigrants.”

cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2017/06/17/priest-uses-chalice-bring-home-immigration-issue-bishops
 
Along those lines of duality, Groody noted the need to “move people beyond binary language: legal or illegal, citizen or alien, native or foreigner, and to try to go to the deeper river of these issues."
So, what is left? If we no longer classify things as legal or illegal, citizen or alien, do we still need to worry about the idea of sin or no sin? Isn’t that what true modernism is, an attempt to redefine what went in the past as something now defined in accord with modern thinking?

You cannot continue to take in illiterate, uneducated, unskilled people, provide them with government assistance for who knows how long and expect the working class to continue to pay for it. I know that bishops would not allow a pastor to plunge a parish into debt with no means of paying for it. It shouldn’t be acceptable for government to do the same.

So, what is the answer? I don’t know but I do know what the answer isn’t.
 
So, what is the answer? I don’t know but I do know what the answer isn’t.
Perhaps, at least, those who give the assistance recognize the virtues of the society which is in a position to help others, instead of criticising and apologising for it.
 
So, what is left? If we no longer classify things as legal or illegal, citizen or alien, do we still need to worry about the idea of sin or no sin? Isn’t that what true modernism is, an attempt to redefine what went in the past as something now defined in accord with modern thinking?

You cannot continue to take in illiterate, uneducated, unskilled people, provide them with government assistance for who knows how long and expect the working class to continue to pay for it. I know that bishops would not allow a pastor to plunge a parish into debt with no means of paying for it. It shouldn’t be acceptable for government to do the same.

So, what is the answer? I don’t know but I do know what the answer isn’t.
Agreed.
 
If you are in a lifeboat filled to capacity in the middle of the ocean with no hope of rescue, do you stop to pick up another 10 people, knowing that this will almost certainly sink the lifeboat and kill everyone in the lifeboat already? Is that charity, or is it stupidity?
 
many immigrants come to the usa not to assimilate but to create what they left behind.

immigration should make us stronger; but, has it: recently?
 
If you are in a lifeboat filled to capacity in the middle of the ocean with no hope of rescue, do you stop to pick up another 10 people, knowing that this will almost certainly sink the lifeboat and kill everyone in the lifeboat already? Is that charity, or is it stupidity?
We are actually not morally *obliged *to put our lives at risk to save the life of another. So a weak swimmer would not be obliged to plunge into a rough sea to save someone, since there is a high risk that both will end up dying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top