Priest uses hand sanitizer at Preparation of the Gifts

  • Thread starter Thread starter AveCrux1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In the General Instruction of the Roman Missal the description of the washing of hands is not very detailed.

In 118c describing the things to be prepared for Mass it has:

“and whatever is needed for the washing of hands.”

In 145 it has:

“the Priest washes his hands standing at the side of the altar and, as the minister pours the water, says quietly, Lava me, Domine ( Wash me, O Lord) .”

It does not say in the Roman Missal that the Priest is to dry his hands. It does in the Ceremonial of Bishops, n. 150: “He washes and dries his hands. One of the deacons may remove the bishop’s ring.”

A silly interpretation of this is that drying the hands is a privilege that only the bishop is permitted. If a Priest does it he is adding something to the liturgy on his own initiative and pretending to be a bishop. It is silly because it would be ridiculous to think that Priest is meant to handle the host with wet hands. It is understood that the process of washing hands in the Roman Missal includes drying the hands.

In the April 2009 edition of the USSCB Committee on Divine Worship Newsletter it has on page 14, under the heading “Ten Questions on Influenza/Swine Flu and the Liturgy”.

8. What measures should be taken in Roman Catholic liturgies in the United States of America now?

Priests, deacons, and extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion should be especially reminded of the need to practice good hygiene. Ministers of Holy Communion should be encouraged to wash their hands before Mass begins, or even to use an alcohol based anti-bacterial solution before and after distributing Holy Communion. They should instruct people who feel ill not to receive from the cup.”

(The full document is at http://www.usccb.org/_cs_upload/7932_1.pdf ).

Using the hand sanitizer just before the distribution Holy Communion is one way. But doing this as part of the Priest’s washing of hands also seems to be a reasonable alternative.

[Excerpts from the English translation of The Roman Missal , © 2010 International Commission on English in the Liturgy Corporation. Excerpt from the English translation of Ceremonial of Bishops , © 1989, International Commission on English in the Liturgy Corporation. All rights reserved.]
 
I don’t know if (i) the priest can omit the washing of his hands with water, (ii) he can use hand sanitiser instead of the ritual hand washing or (iii) can use hand sanitiser as well as the ritual had washing.

What I do know is that people become too frightened of ‘germs’ and go to silly extremes to avoid them.

I won’t scare the nervous by saying how many ways in which microorganisms can get onto his hands after using the hand sanitiser prior to him giving Holy Communion. So, his using the hand sanitiser is giving false comfort.
 
He can use hand sanitizer if he likes, but it cannot replace the Washing of Hands.
In the General Instruction of the Roman Missal the description of the washing of hands is not very detailed.
Liquid hand sanitizer contains both alcohol and water, so I think we can make the case for a ‘washing’ with sanitizer. And, if he does so while praying the prayer, it sure doesn’t sound like he’s running afoul of the rubrics!
 
40.png
phil19034:
He can use hand sanitizer if he likes, but it cannot replace the Washing of Hands.
In the General Instruction of the Roman Missal the description of the washing of hands is not very detailed.
Liquid hand sanitizer contains both alcohol and water, so I think we can make the case for a ‘washing’ with sanitizer. And, if he does so while praying the prayer, it sure doesn’t sound like he’s running afoul of the rubrics!
I’m not a canon lawyer, but hand sanitizer would not be considered valid matter for baptism, therefore, it most likely would not be concerned valid to replace water for mass.

However, IF the Church declared it could be used in place of water, then I would not object.

But it’s not ok for an individual priest or bishop to make their own decision
 
I’m not a canon lawyer, but hand sanitizer would not be considered valid matter for baptism, therefore, it most likely would not be concerned valid to replace water for mass.
  1. It doesn’t “replace” water; there’s water in it.
  2. Baptism isn’t in play here.
  3. This is a liturgical question, not a canonical one.
 
I don’t know if (i) the priest can omit the washing of his hands with water, (ii) he can use hand sanitiser instead of the ritual hand washing or (iii) can use hand sanitiser as well as the ritual had washing.
Here’s what I do know:
(i) the ritual hand washing canNOT be omitted
(ii) sanitizer doesn’t substitute
(iii) sanitizer in addition to the washing is irrelevant to the ritual - do it or don’t, the liturgy doesn’t get impacted either way. It’s fine.

I suspect as well that the OP may see “abuses” that are not confirmed but only suspected, as the initial post doesn’t instill confidence for my part that OP knows what’s actually taking place and has the level of knowledge to levy that judgment.
 
It must be a tremendous comfort to priests to know people are looking out for every detail…
 
Precisely. I had thoughts of becoming a priest in my younger days but feared the liturgy police might retire before I was ordained. Had I known they were just getting started, well, I would have ran to the seminary and knocked the door down. I find that level of analysis the most lacking part of my current profession.
 
40.png
phil19034:
I’m not a canon lawyer, but hand sanitizer would not be considered valid matter for baptism, therefore, it most likely would not be concerned valid to replace water for mass.
  1. It doesn’t “replace” water; there’s water in it.
  2. Baptism isn’t in play here.
  3. This is a liturgical question, not a canonical one.
I think you are missing my point.

The Liturgy calls for water. Hand Sanitizer isn’t water. Water is an ingredient in hand sanitizer, but hand sanitizer isn’t water.

So I don’t think it’s allowed in place of water.

If a priest uses hand sanitizer, he needs to use both water during the purification rite and use hand sanitizer before or after the purification rite with water.
 
Viruses and bacteria don’t take vacations, they are present 365 days per year. Especially for those with compromised immune systems…
I would like to see the EMHCs use hand sanitizer. In 2015 I had a stem cell transplant and have been immune suppressed since. Each cold/flu season, despite precautions, I pick up two simultaneous viruses. They managed to hospitalize me this year.

But the hand washing IIRC, is specified in the G.I.R.M. If the sanitizer has water as an admixture, it would seem to technically meet the standard.
 
The Liturgy calls for water.
Actually, the Roman Missal just says “wash”. The GIRM presumes that water is poured. Then again, the GIRM presumes that a minister pours for the priest. Does that mean that, when the priest does it himself, it’s illicit? Of course not. Similarly, when what is poured is water with alcohol, does that make it illicit? No.
If a priest uses hand sanitizer, he needs to use both water during the purification rite and use hand sanitizer before or after the purification rite with water.
I get that this is your opinion, but I think you’re making up a requirement where none exists.
 
40.png
phil19034:
The Liturgy calls for water.
Actually, the Roman Missal just says “wash”. The GIRM presumes that water is poured. Then again, the GIRM presumes that a minister pours for the priest. Does that mean that, when the priest does it himself, it’s illicit? Of course not. Similarly, when what is poured is water with alcohol, does that make it illicit? No.
If a priest uses hand sanitizer, he needs to use both water during the purification rite and use hand sanitizer before or after the purification rite with water.
I get that this is your opinion, but I think you’re making up a requirement where none exists.
Well, if you can quote a Bishop or canon lawyer who agrees with you, then I will concede.

Otherwise, I can’t see how it’s liturgically possible to not use water.

Personally, when I have seen priests use hand sanitizer, they use it as the gifts are being brought, before walking in front of the altar to receive them. So before the ritualistic hand washing with water - which they still do.
 
Last edited:
Well, if you can quote a Bishop or canon lawyer who agrees with you, then I will concede.
Likewise. Can’t remember ever hearing anyone with any expertise or authority making the claim you’re making, so… quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur. 😉
Otherwise, I can’t see how it’s liturgically possible to not use water.
He is using water. There’s just alcohol in it.
But is the hand sanitizer gluten free?
🤣 👍
(No. Maybe there’s a mustum version, however… 😉 )
 
Actually, the Roman Missal just says “wash”. The GIRM presumes that water is poured. Then again, the GIRM presumes that a minister pours for the priest.
Neither of these are “presumed.” As quoted earlier in the thread, both water and minister are explicitly mentioned.

As they say, necessity knows no law. … But, I don’t really see using hand sanitizer at that point in the liturgy as a necessity. It makes very little sense to me.

Dan
 
He is using water. There’s just alcohol in it.
This is the last email I will say on this:

Hand Sanitizer is NOT water. It’s made from water, but it is not water. Are you willing to drink it?

Just like the hydrogen peroxide in your cabinet isn’t water. The hydrogen peroxide that is sold in pharmacies is 97% water (H2O) and 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).

Urine and soda are both primarily consist of water too, but they are NOT water.

When you make instant iced tea from water and tea powder, you no longer have water.

Same when you make instant coffee or hot chocolate.

So the arguement you are making that hand sanitizer is still water is non-sensical, because if it could be considered water than so could all the other things I just mentioned.

So again, I’m not saying the priest can’t use it, but he would have to wash his hands twice. Once ritualistically with water and the other with the hand sanitizer at a different point in time.

God Bless
 
Last edited:
Hand Sanitizer is NOT water. It’s made from water, but it is not water. Are you willing to drink it?
Depends. If the alcohol present in it is scotch, sure! 😉
When you make instant iced tea from water and tea powder, you no longer have water.
When you mix wine and water, what do you have? (Tread carefully… there’s a question of sacramental theology here, if you answer wrong… 😉 )
So again, I’m not saying the priest can’t use it, but he would have to wash his hands twice. Once ritualistically with water and the other with the hand sanitizer at a different point in time.
Nah. But hey… I get that you want to pretend that it’s so. 👍
 
So again, I’m not saying the priest can’t use it, but he would have to wash his hands twice. Once ritualistically with water and the other with the hand sanitizer at a different point in time.
I agree. And, with that, here you have a canon lawyer on your side and so all disagreement is hereby rendered invalid. … Maybe just illicit. … Well, offensive to pious ears, at least.

Dan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top