First, forgive me if this is kind of tedious, I have a migraine (yet MUST weigh in with my opinion in a sunlit room in front of a computer screen! So there’s the shaker of salt when it comes to my intelligence to read this with!

)
I think it is admirable to live by one’s convictions, when those convictions are not ones that will send you to hell. This being true of both meat consumption and abstinence. The life that I hope we all agree is most to be valued is that of the human soul. The fact is that a soul that does not respect the dignity of life and the value of God’s creation is going to be an impoverished one and that is something worth considering, even when it comes to animal life rather than (or in addition to) human.
We are called to be good stewards of what God has made. We are allowed according to the teachings of the Church to use what God has made for our benefit, barring cruelty that is unbecoming to OUR dignity. If we follow these guidelines, we’re doing okay, whatever our choice (vegan versus “other”) turns out to be.
From the article on
Cruelty to Animals in the Original Catholic Encyclopedia:
I believe that though we may find many modern practices unsavory (particularly for those of us detached from the actual farming trade), if we do not take pleasure in the suffering caused because of them, if we do not buy meat from this producer or store BECAUSE they use these practices and we like the fact that they may involve painfully de-beaking chickens (for example), if such practices can reasonably be assumed to be for the purpose of producing food and NOT for the purpose of causing pain to the animals involved, a Catholic may be comfortable with their decision to purchase and consume that meat. Likewise there is no sin in opting not to do so because of empathy for the suffering that IS caused, whether you agree it is reasonable or not, such sensitivity (provided it does not take precedence over sensitivity to other human souls) could even be commended as perhaps a special grace from God to keep the social conscience of the rest of us not similarly blessed in check.
You will notice that farmers like bbarick (did I get that right?) will take a matter of fact approach towards things those of us who do not live or work on farms would think of as cruel. They do not take pleasure in these things, but regard them as a practical part of life. It is necessity to them. That does not speak of “wanton infliction of pain” to me.
So it does not grieve me to eat that beef, no. I do not think that cow died in vain, but in service to the human life she was made for. That is one more reason we refer to our food as “gifts from Thy (God’s) bounty.” My final answer is “I eat meat and I believe I am pro all life,” if by “pro all life” you mean “pro the dignity and respect of God’s creation, both human and animals, according to the laws laid down by His Church.”
That said, in the interest of honesty I’m actually a vegetarian with the rare exception. Also I eat meat when I can’t separate it from my main dishes as my husband is a carnivore.

But it’s not a matter of conscience for me, only preference.