Fitswimmer,
perhaps you have missed some of the posts. No one is saying that carjack is pro-abort simply because he objects to the pictures being “shoved in the face of pre-schoolers.” We all would object to that. It is a false premise. I believe you started this by saying that some pro-lifers, protesting on a street corner actually approached your car and got close enough that your god-child could clearly see the picture and discern that what he was looking at was a dead and bloody baby. That has been put in a nutsell and people (carjack) are now saying that pro-lifers make a regular habit of “shoving the pictures into the faces of pre-schoolers.” This, of course, is not happening anywhere, that I know of and the pro-lifers on the board have condemned such activity if it is occuring. The other pro-abort on the thread right now is SFTor and he keeps saying the he objects to billboards along the highway that contain the pictures, even though that too is false. There are no such billboards. It doesn’t work. It costs money to put up billboards and any pro-life billboard is destroyed by the pro-aborts within the first 24 hours so this is just a waste of money which pro-life organizations have precious little of anyway.
I gotta run. We are calling carjack pro-abort because of other things he has said on this thread and on other threads. No pro-lifer would object to the use of pictures if they are used appropriately and are shown to be effective in changing the minds of those who call themselves “pro-choice.” Carjack objects, and vehemently. Ergo, because of other things he/she has said, we think he/she is pro-abort." We do have the right to choose what we think. Choice is our right. It is all perfectly legal.
Later.
They are saying I am pro-abort because I don’t agree with pics.