Pro-Life and World Hunger

  • Thread starter Thread starter Priscilla_Ann
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Alfred,

Your posts are very difficult to read without spacing and puncuation.
 
rejection raye at secong stage. 90% rejection rate at the end of this stage. now we learn through word of mouth that at this point it is very useful to hire an attorney to pleasd your case. typically this is done. we done. we have been told that the rejestion rate in the 4th and final stage is about 22%. see anything unusual.at each
a rich person can get sick of course with the same or even a worse illness then my dayghter. if you look close you will discover the beginning of what ihabe been trying to get at fron the beginning. getting ill is the end of it got a rich person. he dioes not have to to any of the myriad tthings that i amd nmmy daughter, and 10s of thousands iof other people have to do to insure a modicum of survival. istage the requirement become harder to satisfy. take a rich person who haAS INHERITED HIS WEALTH. he has done nothing to deserve what is in effect a re ward for what he has done or not done than my daughter. he may have worked at something important and (heres a dill) he may CHOOSE not to. makes no,real difference to him,/ now comes the rough part, at least i hope so. i am not going to let this man or any like him get away with it. he owes my daughterr the best medical car which can be given. there ias a limit of coure, one that must be imposed upon him to the same degree as society is imposing that limit on om daughter. he is entitled to the same high quality medical treamtment that my daughter is, BUT NOT ONE IOTA BETTER, UNLESS HE CAN PROOVE THAT HE HAS CONTRIBUTE MORE TO THE WELFARE OF SOCIET Y that nmy daughter has. niow he has choice, he can agree (although i hate the idea thatb i must ask him before i can do it ) he can agree to pay taxes to accomplish this end. much more fabvorable than the seconfd alternative. if he reuses, i will find a way to get the money that is necessary to do the best i can to make sure my daughter is afforeded every opportunity to live as healthily as she csn, roughly the same as the rich person, iwill find it. i will use any method that im have to to find it,. mt=y daughter is not going to die because of groups of very rich influential people have decided thjat shen will die, because their tax rates are too high. i will get it. and everyone of them had better be carefukl when they goi to bed tonight. look under the bed and in the closet. is this being melodramatic? oh yes. bu for me and te thousands that aressentially the same position, a position where we aand oiur families did EVERYHING they could abnd EVERYTHING they were supposed to. and tey still are not going to be allowed the beefits of living in the miost affluebnt society in the owrld becauser some people do not want an increas in the =ie taxes,no i will not allow it. if nthere is a god he is on my side, and you may not question the validity of that last statement. i know im right about go just as everyone who has said that they they know they are right about what go d want through the age,. we just know.enough dsaid. hoping this gives you a crack of insight into what is happening to some people out hers.
 
Please keep in mind that there are different kinds of “rich”.

Someone with a lot of assets may have no “income” … they can tap in to all sorts of mechanisms for sheltering their wealth so that NOBODY can get at it. There are all sorts of trusts, tax exempt foundations, off-shore accounts, friendly banks in Switzerland, the Cayman Islands, even in Uruguay … all sorts of places. [Which is why the sales tax … Read the book “The Fair Tax” by Neal Boortz … www.fairtax.org is advantageous. Because somewhere along the line they do use cars and planes and upscale whiskey … and with the Fair Tax, they would finally pay some taxes. ] But I digress.

There even are people who have fled to Cuba where they very nicely looked after.

They have huge staffs of lawyers, accountants and lobbyists and they are totally immune from tax laws.

They may not actually, legally, even own anything. Everything may be in the name of some anonymous-looking trust or foundation.
Then there are the people who do work, but who make a huge salary. These folks pay taxes through the nose.

Anyway, hang in there.

Keep posting.

👍
 
in sorry but this is really beyond me. now as you say if i was rich i could take that money and investr if somewhere in a foreign country, make tones of more money and because inm doing it that way i wont pay taxed in the states. dont know all the tax laws even though i wouled fior h and r bolck for 3 tax seasons so i cant answer you question. UTY if they can hide their mioney in a foreigh country in order to esape taxation what in the world is to prevent them fromfrom finding the country that offers t he best deal on anthing or everyting they buy, do not pay taxes on the purchase. what is the difference between the first instancer and the second.
 
its really nice to know as you state that "somewhere along the line they will finally wind up paying taxes. where can i get a ticket to the somewhere sometinme thing.
 
im dont want to sound too much like a simpleton but i have the answer. set upo, tax system which breaks down the vadious income catagoires and the rates of ezxch one. then collect it.,… nio exemption, no decdution, lock the tax bill in a unbreakable safe and make sur nobady can get at it. no shcnanges. a 2 page tax bill.now the easy part, anyone caught trying to get this tax bill changed in any way (except as described belos) in any way which even raemotelyn favors them will have both hands cut of biot back pocket on all his oppants sewn tight. etc. no appeal once guilt has been established., 2nd offece death in by very clever and imaginative ways which i believ i will spend part of the day tomorow thinking up and considering. 3 rd offecse. we disinter your body and do very very strange tings to it
 
have you read my monsterous email telling you and the world about my dughter? if so what do you think if not what do you thinkabout the rich and taxes now
 
ALFREDENEUMAN said:
have you read my monsterous email telling you and the world about my dughter? if so what do you think if not what do you thinkabout the rich and taxes now
Click to expand...
I have proven your thories rediculous and your solcialist ideas as unreasonable and you have not listened. That rich man owes you and your daughter nothing and you have no right to take from him what he has given his son. You gave you daughter life and I understand that you feel that no one else has a right to take it away from her. But that rich man gave life to his son and also left him an inheritance…as reasonable as you think that it is that he should have to give it to your daughter, it is not. He wanted to provide security and a future for his son and it is not yours to take. This is socialism and it does not work as an economic system.

Do you not think that the tax code started out simply? Many have tried to explain to you how not all income is the same and how a lot of income gets taxed twice and in ways that are against the constitution…should we just throw the constitution out as well? Things are not as black and white as you would suggest, but you are refusing to listen to what people are saying. Ironically the super rich would probably be the ones who pay no taxes under your policy because they do not have traditional income. The ones who would be hit the most are the middle class and the poor.
Stop sitting there complaining, where is the money? It’s out there go find it.
 
i was wrong somewhere along the line i failed to understand that i was talking to an automaton instead of a real live human being. you are worn in what you say, how do i jb==know? because if you are right and if we acted towards each other based on what you say is correct bbehavior them we would have killed oursev=lves or each othe thousands of years ago. and good ridance,
in college io a particularlty=y bad day, probably a day when consefrvatives had one again provven thier lack of heart on a particular piece of legislTUION I WAS TAKLING WITH ONE OF MY TEACHERS AND REMERKED ABOUT HOW DISCOURAGING IT WAS SOMETIMES TO SEE THIS HAPPENING. SHE SAID, LOOK AT HISTORY AND IT WILL MAKE YOU FEEL BETTER. IN THE LONG RUN LIBERALS AND LIBERAL THOUGHT AND COMPASSION ASSOCIATED WITH THAT THOUGH ALWAYS WIN. YOU JUST HAVE TO GIVER THEM A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME. SINCE THE BEGINNING OF RECORDED HISTORY BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE THE WAY THEY DO CONSERVATIVES ALWAYS HAVE MORE OF THE WORLDS RESOURCES. MONEY FOR EXMPLE. EVERY TIME YOU COUNT THEY HAVE THE DAUGH, THEIR PHILOSOPHY IS GEARED TOWARD SELFISHNESESSM GREED AND I DFDONT CRE, ABOUT ANYBODY ELSE. WITH ALL THIS TIME AND ALL THIS MONEY YOU WOULD EXPECT THAT THEIR PHILOSOPHY WOULD WIN IN ANY BATTLE WITH LIBERK PHILOSOHY. YET THEY DONT. PROOF? SUR. TAKE ANY INSTITUTION IN A SOCIETY OURS OR ANYONESNS ELSES. FAMILY STRUCTURE, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, MUILITARY, RELIGIOUS. GO DOWN THE LIST. EXAMINT THEM BNOW IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY BRLIRVR AAND HOW THEY BEHAVE THEN COMPARE THAT SAME INSTITUTIOJ TO THEMSELVES, 100 YEARS AGO 200 YEARS AGO 1000 YEARS AGO WHENEVER. THEY ARE NOW MOR LIBERAL THEN THEY WERE THAN. IN ADDITION TO SHOW HOW SPEEDY THE CHANGE CXAN BE TAKE THAT SAME INSDTITUTIONAND EXAMINE IT AT ANY POINT IN HISTORY. PICK AN ARBITRARY DATE SAY 1457 THEN EXAMINE THAT SAME INSTIT 100 YEARD BEFOR THAT AND THEY WUILL WINFD UOP MORE LIBERAL., NOS THIS DOEANT MEAN ITHAT IN THE BATTLE GOING ON TODAY COMPARED WITH THE BATTLE GOING ON TOMORROW LIBERALS WILL WIN, YOU HEAVE TO ALLOW A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME. BUT SERIOUSLY EXAMINE4 AND THINK AND YOU WILL FIND THAT LIBERAL WITH THOSE QUALITIES EVENTUALL DOMINATE AM I WWRON. SO YOU AND YOUR PHILOSOPY AND YOUR UIL=K ARE DIEING DINOSAUTRS,… YOU WILL GO AWAY. AND BETTER WILL REPLACE YOU. II DOUBT THAT IT WILL BE IN TIME TO, SAVE TGHE LIFE OF MY DAUGHETER BUT THER IS NOTHING I CAN DCO ABOUT YOU AND THAT. GOODBYE… MAY GOD, MY 3 GODS, MT 45 GODS, GO WITH YOU. YOU EVIDENTLY NEED THEM ALL
 
I haven’t read this long thread, but re the original question:

The solution to world hunger is not dead babies.

:eek:
 
No You Are Right Although Imnot Sure What One Has To Do With The Other. If Dead Babies Offend You Terribly Reread What Im Said About The 25000 A Day And Feed The. Or Insist That Your Church Or Government Or School Or Something Feed Them
 
ALFREDENEUMAN said:
No You Are Right Although Imnot Sure What One Has To Do With The Other. If Dead Babies Offend You Terribly Reread What Im Said About The 25000 A Day And Feed The. Or Insist That Your Church Or Government Or School Or Something Feed Them
Click to expand...
**Please! ** Compose your posts in your word processor, and run your spelling and grammar checker before cutting and pasting into the forum.
 
ALFREDENEUMAN said:
No You Are Right Although Imnot Sure What One Has To Do With The Other. If Dead Babies Offend You Terribly Reread What Im Said About The 25000 A Day And Feed The. Or Insist That Your Church Or Government Or School Or Something Feed Them
Click to expand...
Say what? :confused:
 
vern_humphrey said:
As best I can figure out, he said, “No Left Poltroon Gambrel Do Wash Not Glad Groom To Flake.”😃
Click to expand...
0ooH -. I:L sEea sayhs stde bLIdn ma nn.

]+ = Cone tO tgink oF irt, i DoNT KNIOW wyHy I HaD &/ dsuch a h3ar-d:- tI2dme fIGURind g ,it ouuT :;
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top