Pro-Life Groups: Boycott Pepsi for Using Aborted Fetal Cell Lines

  • Thread starter Thread starter juliee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pro-Life Groups: Boycott Pepsi for Using Aborted Fetal Cell Lines

Washington, DC – Dozens of pro-life groups are calling on pro-life Americans to boycott PepsiCo because it has contracted with a company that uses fetal cells from babies victimized by abortions to test and produce artificial flavor enhancers.

lifenews.com/2011/05/25/pro-life-groups-boycott-pepsi-for-using-aborted-fetal-cell-lines/
Boycotting a company with secondary (or in this case tertiary) consent to abortion is not something that is obligatory for Catholics. We must boycott primary consenting companies, but secondary and tertiary companies become so far removed that you cannot be held responsible for their actions.

Essentially you are purchasing a product that has nothing to do with the initial grave act (abortion) and you have no control over what the company which receives your money subsequently does with that money.

While I think it is a good idea, it should not be held up as obligatory to boycott these companies. I do my best to avoid them, and pepsi is an easy one for me to avoid, but it is not morally obligatory.

FSC
 
I would like to see an official statement from Pepsico on this.

While we may not be obligated to boycott Pepsi, I don’t see how I can enjoy my lunch at Taco Bell, or my snack of a handful of Doritos, knowing that the company that makes them is funding research that uses aborted humans.

I understand that none of the aborted tissue ends up in the food product. Oh great.

I don’t think I can ever even look at another Pepsi product without feeling sick.

Hopefully, Pepsico will do the right thing. Or, (too much to hope), we will hear their side of this and see that they really are not to blame.
 
I would like to see an official statement from Pepsico on this.

While we may not be obligated to boycott Pepsi, I don’t see how I can enjoy my lunch at Taco Bell, or my snack of a handful of Doritos, knowing that the company that makes them is funding research that uses aborted humans.

I understand that none of the aborted tissue ends up in the food product. Oh great.

I don’t think I can ever even look at another Pepsi product without feeling sick.

Hopefully, Pepsico will do the right thing. Or, (too much to hope), we will hear their side of this and see that they really are not to blame.
Thanks for telling me that Doritos are on the forbidden list now! I could have finished my last bag of Spicy Habanero tonight. Now I have to dispose of it. I am already giving up the only brand of pasta that I buy. 😦
 
You already paid for the bag. It’s up to you whether to toss it or not.

I’m not a fan of Pepsi’s militant support of certain homosexual causes, but how does one test flavors on cells from aborted babies? Am I misunderstanding something?
 
You already paid for the bag. It’s up to you whether to toss it or not.

I’m not a fan of Pepsi’s militant support of certain homosexual causes, but how does one test flavors on cells from aborted babies? Am I misunderstanding something?
its toxicity testing, allergan testing, that sort of thig. Not for flavor, but does this particular flavorant (is that a word?) cause any negative effects?

Make sense?
 
You’ve explained it well, thanks. But it still doesn’t make ‘sense’ to me, if you get what I mean. 😉
 
You’ve explained it well, thanks. But it still doesn’t make ‘sense’ to me, if you get what I mean. 😉
It would make more sense to you if you realized how many innocent cute animals are saved from testing toxic products on them. 😉
 
You’ve explained it well, thanks. But it still doesn’t make ‘sense’ to me, if you get what I mean. 😉
Oh absolutely. Pretty darn ludicrous if you ask me…
It would make more sense to you if you realized how many innocent cute animals are saved from testing toxic products on them. 😉
Absolutely. We dont want a fuzzy little cutesy animal getting hurt when we can just test it on the shredded remains of a baby that we have managed to keep alive for 30 or so years. :mad:👍
 
I’m sorry. I gotta make a stand here:

Testing on anybody or anything is WRONG unless that person or thing agrees to be tested on. Yes, we can give Pepsi (or whatever) to adult humans and they can decide what tastes better or works better. But we should not be playing “mad scientist” in a lab and using HUMAN BEINGS OR ANIMALS for some sick research.

Okay, I’ll get off my soap box now!! :o
 
I’m sorry. I gotta make a stand here:

Testing on anybody or anything is WRONG unless that person or thing agrees to be tested on. Yes, we can give Pepsi (or whatever) to adult humans and they can decide what tastes better or works better. But we should not be playing “mad scientist” in a lab and using HUMAN BEINGS OR ANIMALS for some sick research.

Okay, I’ll get off my soap box now!! :o
How do you suggest on a way to get consent from animals? :confused:
 
While no one likes cruelty to animals, I fully support the use of lab rats etc., for medical testing, over the cells of aborted babies.

Or any other kind of testing. In fact it makes me wonder about all those cosmetic companies that proudly proclaim ‘No animal testing.’

Are they indeed testing on fetal cells?
 
How do you suggest on a way to get consent from animals? :confused:
We don’t. That is the whole point. We shouldn’t use something for our “mad scientist” research. Many people believe (incorrectly) that many useful medications and surgeries were perfected because of the use of lab rats and other lab animals. That is incorrect. For example, the polio vaccine (which many would agree is one of the most important useful vacs out there) was almost rejected because it killed lab rats. Good thing that they decided to use it on CONCENTING folks to determined that it actually works.

Anyway, I believe that it is MORALLY wrong to be cruel to living creatures. God gave us dominion over the plants and animals. He didn’t say “use them for your own benefit”, “abuse them,” etc.

Like I said, there are going to be many many people on CAF and elsewhere that will disagree with me for this is a Catholic forum not an animal rights forum.

But I think that treating something that is “less” than you in a cruel manner is evil. Regardless of the thing that is “less” than you (unborn baby, eldery, children, animals, etc).

No cruelty. Plain and simple.
 
I value human life over that of animals.

How do you propose that products be tested for safety? Wait until someone dies and then sue the manufacturer?
 
We don’t. That is the whole point. We shouldn’t use something for our “mad scientist” research. Many people believe (incorrectly) that many useful medications and surgeries were perfected because of the use of lab rats and other lab animals. That is incorrect.

Please provide specific information instead of a generalized statement. You are trying to implying that all the research an laboratory animals is useless.

For example, the polio vaccine (which many would agree is one of the most important useful vacs out there) was almost rejected because it killed lab rats. Good thing that they decided to use it on CONCENTING folks to determined that it actually works.

You mention one possible case (almost rejected) out of decades of work in medical and biological research. Do not you think that it is a bit too much of a stretch to make your point?

Anyway, I believe that it is MORALLY wrong to be cruel to living creatures. God gave us dominion over the plants and animals. He didn’t say “use them for your own benefit”,

What does “dominion” means to you?

“abuse them,” etc.

I completely agree with you here!

Like I said, there are going to be many many people on CAF and elsewhere that will disagree with me for this is a Catholic forum not an animal rights forum.

But I think that treating something that is “less” than you in a cruel manner is evil. Regardless of the thing that is “less” than you (unborn baby, eldery, children, animals, etc).

You will not hear any disagreement from Catholics about the fact that cruelty is evil (see Catholic Encyclopedia) , the main problem that I see is that your definition of cruelty is quite encompassing of any form of suffering.

No cruelty. Plain and simple.
 
I dont buy any carbonated bevages that includes pepsi,coke as i have diabetes and refuse diet drinkis ugh i cannot stomach those totally hate diet drinks and coke and pepsi have way too much sugar so i dont buy any of these. only water for me.
 
I would like to see an official statement from Pepsico on this.

While we may not be obligated to boycott Pepsi, I don’t see how I can enjoy my lunch at Taco Bell, or my snack of a handful of Doritos, knowing that the company that makes them is funding research that uses aborted humans.

I understand that none of the aborted tissue ends up in the food product. Oh great.

I don’t think I can ever even look at another Pepsi product without feeling sick.

Hopefully, Pepsico will do the right thing. Or, (too much to hope), we will hear their side of this and see that they really are not to blame.
I totally agree. I’m grossed out by it and hope there is an end to it. Lately I’ve read about processed and fast foods (check out the book Fast Food Nation, for example) and am trying to greatly reduce if not eliminate my consumption of such types of foods anyway.

It’s challenging but rewarding. One thing I’ve discovered, though, is that it’s much easier to do if you prepare your own food at home and (in my case) live by yourself. Whenever I get with friends is when I’m sometimes caught at a fast-food place. However, I avoid the Pepsi-brand sodas (and other soda which I don’t need anyway) by drinking iced tea or water.

What’s hard sometimes is that it takes time and research to trace back the company to the parent company or even if you can, to avoid all their products.

My boycott is my own choice - I know whole business about direct or indirect cooperation in evil, so I’m not trying to be scrupulous and think I’ve committed a mortal sin if I drink a Pepsi, but I do want to vote with my pocketbook and to avoid being grossed out and disgusted.
 
Boycotts only work if the co. knows you are boycotting.
Plese take the time to contact Pepsi.
To Contact PepsiCo:

Jamie Caulfield, Sr. VP
PepsiCo, Inc.
700 Anderson Hill Road
Purchase, NY 10577
(914) 253-2000

To contact online:
cr.pepsi.com/usen/pepsiusen.cfm?date=20110527
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Be prepared for the following reponse from Pepsi:
Please be assured that PepsiCo is committed to using only the highest ethical methods in all aspects of our research. This is something we take very seriously, and we hold ourselves and all of our research partners to the same high standards as the world’s leading research centers.
With respect to the flavor discovery research with Senomyx, we utilize techniques that have been the gold standard for several decades by top universities, hospitals, U.S. government agencies, food and beverage companies, and essentially every pharmaceutical and biotech company in the world. Yet, there is some misinformation being circulated meant to distort what we’re doing and question our motives and those of other companies. This is unfortunate, and it is certainly not reflective of the work we are doing.
We hope this information is helpful and reassuring. Thank you again for reaching out to us and allowing us to clarify the situation.
Of course there is nothing “helpful and reassuring” about this. And they never address what “misinformation being circulated”. They must think using an aborted baby’s body for research is “ethical” Basically this response is a “we are not going to do anything about this situation” response. More Pro-Lifers need to contact them, and please let them know this response is not OK.

Please realize that the aborted cells are not in the product you buy, but the aborted baby’s cells were used to develop new flavors. Let them know that this is not ethical.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top