That’s OK. Everyone makes mistakes. No problem.
I haven’t disappeared. I’m still watching.
Good. Actually I think we would probably agree on a lot. I hope to see you in my thread on abortion. Honestly.I haven’t disappeared. I’m still watching.
You are right. I’ve never been through this before. This is amazing. While reading these last posts I’ve felt my faith in God grow much stronger. I am very very happy!!
I’ve heard many people say the same thing. They know. PROCHOICERS KNOW THAT WHAT THEY ARE KILLING IS A HUMAN BEING. They rationalize in order to ease their guilt. But they know.
Is what? And whatever it is, is the use of govt’s police power to enforce the " moral law", always compatible with the notion of liberty?
He may have had a near-death experience but he is not dead. People without heartbeats are brought back. People with nondecipherable brain waves have been brought back. Look it up. Google it. Find out.
Now Caramel, please use the term pro-abortionist if you are using that line of argument—remember. Pro-choice is a legal position arguing for the limits of govt power.
Just testing to see if what I was told (that threads close at 1000 posts) is true. I guess it isn’t.I haven’t disappeared. I’m still watching.
Worthy, I like you. You drive me nuts but I like you, my friend.Now Caramel, please use the term pro-abortionist if you are using that line of argument—remember. Pro-choice is a legal position arguing for the limits of govt power.
Like I said…that is purely arbitrary. Even before the heartbeat and brainwave activity start, the “lifeless embryo” is growing. Things that are lifeless do not grow, they decay. Even before this activity starts it is growing based on its own unique, genetic material. Also by saying it is “lifeless,” you are showing your ignorance of basic biology. If a heartbeat and brain activity are requirements for life, then there are millions of organisms out there which you claim are nor alive. Furthermore, basing a scientific definition on the words of a president who has shown himself on multiple occasions to be less than bright is not a very wise course of action.
For the sake of Justice, some things require protecton. The unborn children in their Mother’s womb demand in justice, they be protected. The abortionists are killing children, they are killing humans who have potential to become whatever they choose to become. And yes, it is the government’s role to protect the innocent. What you are talking about in the name of liberty is chaos.
This is the second time you have invoked the name of St. Thomas More without providing proper context. With every post you reveal that you are concerned about your own liberties, but no one else’s.
Well for someone who uses his picture as part of your signature, you certainly should not need any context to be provided. For everyone else, I recommend " The Life of Thomas More" by Peter Ackroyd and the play " A Man for all Seasons" by Robert Bolt.
I own the movie, have had a course in Tudor-Stuart England, and have read Utopia. I am not concerned about myself, but for the lurkers who might not know the story. More did not fall victim to justice, but was martyred defending it. I recommend you stop trying to misrepresent my patron.
Without legitimate justification.
Yes, less effective. It is not either/or. It is both legal protection and other avenues. The civil law exists for a reason.
The baby deserves protection, the protection of the law.
At one point you were just “cells”. In some ways we all still are.
But it wasn’t moral justice, but the whim of a king.
We are paying a price for being too silent for the past 36 years while legalized abortion has been running rampant. Even 54% of Catholics voted for this administration…