R
ryecroft
Guest
Thank you, I am in complete agreement with you!Exactly. I feel I should supplement what I said earlier with this - ABC is it’s own cross to bear. It’s a strain, to be sure. There just is no easy way, that’s why marriage is considered it’s own trial.
I really do think that’s why, as a general rule, we need to treat one another with unending patience, understanding, and non-judgmental attitudes when we don’t know something for sure. Spacing births is really only up to the priest, the couple, and God. And it’s hard and painful enough with just THOSE three!!![]()
I’ve been thinking an praying a great deal about this - and I guess I just feel that the people that are coming out and touting that NFP has a 99% + success rate (and I did look in the books that I/we had used for our training with various NFP forms and it does say anything from 96%-99.4% success rate) - it just seems really dishonest. I will be the first to say, I really wish it did have that kind of success rate (with regards to preventing pregnancy) - I’ve heard the Janet Smith talks and the Dr. Brenner talks and they all come out with these stats - but I just don’t believe they can be true - either that or they are defining “success” as something different.
I’ve just seen so many people and heard of many more who have tried and found out something didn’t work right - perhaps if there was another way to find out it wasn’t working OTHER than getting a + sign on a pregnancy test. It is very disheartening to go through these NFP classes, chart for months and stick religiously to a regimen and then be told “oh well, I guess God wanted you to be pregnant” or "you must have had a “break through ovulation”
The NFP people and or the Church - whoever is putting these stats out needs to be specific about the “success” and what they mean and if success is also taking into consideration those who were very staunchly trying to avoid pregnancy and those who wern’t. To me, it’s lying by omission.
God Bless
Rye