L
Linusthe2nd
Guest
All the examples given above and earlier are from experts, including our pastors. It is acknowledged that not every student will be adversely effected. It is to advise parents that there are real problems in the educational environment and to aprise them of these problems before they are confronted by a returning child who has fallen victim to them. Our Lord said, " I have not come to save the just but those who are lost. " Or again, those who stand should beware lest they too fall. Linus2ndGay and Godless– The school wound up with bad publicity. I doubt it’ll happen again
Stomping on Jesus– One teacher. Not a university making it part of a curriculum, ONE TEACHER. And he got severely reprimanded for it
Be Prepared– You said it yourself. Not all teachers are going to attack your faith. I, for one, have never had any of those teachers. Also, not actually having read most of the epistles, I wouldn’t think it’s far-fetched at all to say to say they’re about love. Remember, love is why God sent Jesus.
Vanderbilt– Okay. I agree they should keep a religious exemption clause in that rule. But at the same time, you can’t claim they’re being anti-Catholic. Anti-religious, maybe, but it’s affecting all the religious groups. And probably even atheistic groups, if those exist. Don’t attribute to malice what can be explained as a dumb idea. And from Part II, places ARE allowed to restrict rights. Yes we have free speech, but teachers still have every right, for instance, to reprimand you for verbally attacking them in class. It’s disappointing that they restricted those rights at a protest (which covers multiple rights), but I can at least understand the reasoning.
Top 10 Challenges– “A number of students” I want numbers. Actually, this one intrigues me. I wonder if there’s any correlation between religion at the beginning of college and at the end. Is there one religion that more people join? Is there one religion with much fewer people converting away? I might look into this, actually
Thoughts from the Science Classroom– I, for one, have never felt my faith conflicted by learning about evolution or the Big Bang. I support, as the article names it, the independence view. I’ve always felt that, in short, science describes how things work and religion describes why. It might be more difficult for Young-Earth Creationists, but overall, I don’t see too much of a problem here.
Religious classroom– I have issues with this bullet. I’m religious, and yet I still think something like that would get irritating as a background. Not because of the words, just because it’s text. Backgrounds, IMO, should be pictorial, with the only text being a reminder of school computer use policies
.