Protestant Argument of the Eucharist

  • Thread starter Thread starter beachieca
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
mercygate:
Ahh. But it is not a contradiction at all. In the Eucharist, Jesus breaches the veil between time and eternity . . .

Be assured, acceptance and appreciation of this mystery does not come in a day; it comes by faith and even the desire to believe it may take years for someone not familiar with it. “Faith that comes by hearing pierces through the veil . . .”

Lord, increase our faith.
Hey MG, I hear in your “voice” a comprehension of what it is to fully accept Christ as Savior, healer, redeemer, and friend. What you have described as coming from your experience with a deeper understanding of the Eucharist, is what I came to understand with a fuller commitment to Christ…a literal “laying down of my life/will for His.”

I met this young woman a while back, and as we were sharing our hearts about how Christ has shown Himself to us, she asked, “So, when did Jesus become your Savior?” And I could easily point to the day I finally said and sincerely meant it, “Go for it, Lord. My life be yours to do as you please! I’ll turn away from all things contrary to you. Just lead me. Show me the way.” Not a problem.

Then she asked, “So when did He become your KING?” And I was stumped. Had I really gotten to a point of full submission. obedience, sanctification, consecration --a time when I could, without a doubt say, “He is the one I follow. He is my LORD and King!”

This challenged me…and I found myself searching for a deeper level of faith. Through prayer, time in the Word and a daily devotion to Him, I was brought to a new level. I fully understood and felt His presence. I have had the cry of my heart answered so personally so many times, that there is simply NO WAY I can think it all coincidence. The LORD speaks to my heart. The LORD guides me in His Word…

I continue to seek Him first in priority, and He continually shows me new things.

So…help me to see what there possible could be that I am missing.
D.
 
40.png
Huguenot:
But if His sacrifice was “once for all”, it means that the Eucharist brings back His sacrifice to our minds now, it doesn’t renew it, so it’s symbolical … I don’ t see any difference …
Maybe it’s too difficult for me also because of the language, both theological language and the fact that my native language is French.
Huguenot: Think of “once for all” as “once and for all of time present.” St. John, the author of the book of Revelations shows us that the risen Christ, now glorified, appears in Heaven as a slain lamb. This reveals for us that the Sacrifice of the Cross happended one time but it is suspended in time, meaning it is ALWAYS really present and real, until his second coming.

Revelation 5:6 Then I saw a Lamb, looking as if it had been slain, standing in the center of the throne, encircled by the four living creatures and the elders. He had seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits Or the sevenfold Spirit] of God sent out into all the earth.
 
Looks like we were writing simultaneously. Thanks, MercyGate, for the explanation.

I feel like I need to maybe start a new thread…since I have other questions that have come to me since visiting these other threads.

I’ve appreciated these discussions…they have helped me to see that the Lord can meet us where we are at.

In His Unfailing Love,
D.
 
40.png
Doreen:
So…help me to see what there possible could be that I am missing.
D.
I’m not some kind of a salesman trying to close a deal here. 😛 Christ himself will draw you to his heart in his own good time and for your good and for his greater glory. We’ll walk with you but it is him alone whom you must follow.

What we have in the Eucharist is often beyond words to describe. It is a certainty, a fellowship – not just “me and Jesus” but also me and Jesus and all the saints who ever shared his family table: “that they all might be one.”

I perceive that you are at a place where you must reach for his hand and pray the prayer that I had to pray when I stood at the threshold of the Church (fearing to cross that threshold but wanting to be true to Christ):

Lord, if this really IS YOUR Church, then I need to be IN it and not OUT of it. So, if the Catholic Church is truly your Sacred Body and Bride, do whatever it takes to bring me in. I am yours.
 
40.png
mercygate:
The Church officially, and Catholics privately, acknowledge that the Holy Spirit “blows where it listeth” and does NOT stay in the house. If the Holy Spirit communicated only with “insiders” we wouldn’t have St. Paul! The Church teaches that those who seek God sincerely are candidates for Heaven. But on the tough side, she (the Church) states that once a person has recognized the centrality and authenticity of the Catholic Church and willfully rejects her, he is placing his soul in mortal danger because we know that the Church is Christ’s Church and to reject her is to reject Jesus: “He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects yourejects me, and he whorejects me rejects him who sent me.” (Lk 10:16)

How are you missing out? The only way for you to know that is to experience it for yourself. When Christ gives you the supernatural hunger to receive his Body and Blood – as your mother used to tell you about being in love – You WILL know! All I can say is that nothing you describe in your experience of your faith is NOT part of Catholic life. The Eucharist consolidates it, matures it.
Thank you for that post, and for mentioning that when someone recognizes the authenticity of the Catholic Church and still rejects the truth, then they are putting their soul in jeapordy.
 
40.png
Doreen:
In essence, I am describing myself. How would you say I am missing out on the fullness of Christ? Do you believe I would not “make it to heaven?”

D.
Hope you don’t mind me chiming in on this. As for the second part of the Question- Only God knows the state of the sould at death. So, we can’t answer that one. As to the first part of the question: You are missing out on th efullness of Christ and his family because you are not a member of the church that he built upon St. Peter prior to his perfect sacrifice. He gave us his Church (mystical body on earth) to guide us and show us the true path- the narrow gate if you will. We cannot understand scripture through our own interpretation, for example. That is why God gave us the authority of the church, to guide us and show us the fullness of his truth:

Acts 8:26-36

7 Then the angel of the Lord spoke to Philip, “Get up and head south on the road that goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza, the desert route.”
27
So he got up and set out. Now there was an Ethiopian eunuch, a court official of the Candace, 8 that is, the queen of the Ethiopians, in charge of her entire treasury, who had come to Jerusalem to worship,
28
and was returning home. Seated in his chariot, he was reading the prophet Isaiah.
29
The Spirit said to Philip, “Go and join up with that chariot.”
30
9 Philip ran up and heard him reading Isaiah the prophet and said, “Do you understand what you are reading?”
31
He replied, “How can I, unless someone instructs me?” So he invited Philip to get in and sit with him. 32
This was the scripture passage he was reading: “Like a sheep he was led to the slaughter, and as a lamb before its shearer is silent, so he opened not his mouth.
33
In (his) humiliation justice was denied him. Who will tell of his posterity? For his life is taken from the earth.”
34
Then the eunuch said to Philip in reply, “I beg you, about whom is the prophet saying this? About himself, or about someone else?”
35
Then Philip opened his mouth and, beginning with this scripture passage, he proclaimed Jesus to him.
36
As they traveled along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, “Look, there is water. What is to prevent my being baptized?”
 
40.png
Doreen:
Looks like we were writing simultaneously. Thanks, MercyGate, for the explanation.

I feel like I need to maybe start a new thread…since I have other questions that have come to me since visiting these other threads.

I’ve appreciated these discussions…they have helped me to see that the Lord can meet us where we are at.

In His Unfailing Love,
D.
. . . and another thing. One is never “done” with appreciating and understanding the Eucharistic mystery. Just when you think you’ve reached the pinnacle of experiential and intellectual apprehension, CLUNK! The Boss whomps you upside the knot with another layer of understanding, removes another veil . . . It is truly a “river of living water flowing from within” (Jn 7:38). It never ends.
 
40.png
Doreen:
I met this young woman a while back, and as we were sharing our hearts about how Christ has shown Himself to us, she asked, “So, when did Jesus become your Savior?” And I could easily point to the day I finally said and sincerely meant it, “Go for it, Lord. My life be yours to do as you please! I’ll turn away from all things contrary to you. Just lead me. Show me the way.” Not a problem.

Then she asked, “So when did He become your KING?” And I was stumped. Had I really gotten to a point of full submission. obedience, sanctification, consecration --a time when I could, without a doubt say, “He is the one I follow. He is my LORD and King!”

D.
He became our savior the day he died when he was crucified. He became our king on the same day. Some people either don’t know this or they refuse to submit to this. For he completed the perfect sacrifice for all of mankind.
 
40.png
St.Eric:
He became our savior the day he died when he was crucified. He became our king on the same day. Some people either don’t know this or they refuse to submit to this. For he completed the perfect sacrifice for all of mankind.
I had the same reaction to the question. As a former Protestant, originally from a “born again” tradition, all the emphasis was on MY acceptance of Jesus Christ. Catholics tend to take it from a more objective angle, with more emphasis on the Person of Jesus.

In today’s Gospel Jesus asks: “Who do men say that I am?” and then he asks “But who do you say that I am?” Peter answered him, “You are the Christ.” Nothing “personal” about that: a recognition of objective truth. Generally in the Catholic mind objective truth is valued above subjective feelings.

Sidebar: The Venerable Bede’s commentary on Peter’s confession notes that it is divinity which affirms the humanity of Christ: “Who do men say that the Son of Man is?” while it is humanity (Peter) that affirms his divinity: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
 
40.png
mercygate:
I had the same reaction to the question. As a former Protestant, originally from a “born again” tradition, all the emphasis was on MY acceptance of Jesus Christ. Catholics tend to take it from a more objective angle, with more emphasis on the Person of Jesus.

In today’s Gospel Jesus asks: “Who do men say that I am?” and then he asks “But who do you say that I am?” Peter answered him, “You are the Christ.” Nothing “personal” about that: a recognition of objective truth. Generally in the Catholic mind objective truth is valued above subjective feelings.

Sidebar: The Venerable Bede’s commentary on Peter’s confession notes that it is divinity which affirms the humanity of Christ: “Who do men say that the Son of Man is?” while it is humanity (Peter) that affirms his divinity: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
Good points. As a convert I can see both sides. When I was a “born again” fundamentalist, it was all about the “ME-ology”, how I FELT about Christ and my “Personal relationship” with him. In retrospect it was all about how “I” “felt” in my “walk”. Now I see the truth of the real “theology” rather than the “me-ology”. Christ has died, Christ has risen: and is the Lord and King of all, regardless how I feel about it on any given day. Even when I am having a bad day and don’t “feel” particularly spiritual, I know he is still there in all his glory; and now I don’t have to deal with the frequent “crisis of faith.”
 
40.png
Doreen:
And he/she maintains their state of grace by “feeding” on the Word of God through prayer and the promised work of the Holy Spirit…and daily repentance as they come before the Lord in worship, prayer and meditation on the Word.)
As mercygate has so eloquently stated, there are many layers that our Lord constantly peels away–revealing deeper and deeper understandings. As Catholics we “feed” on God’s written Word through prayer and the promised work of the Holy Spirit. And we “feed” on the Word made flesh, the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. We “feed” on the spiritual and the physical. It’s a very summarized answer, but the best I can do right now. 🙂
40.png
Doreen:
Do you believe I would not “make it to heaven?”
We cannot make that judgement call, but if you want my opinion, I think you will be singing with the heavenly choir of angels one day. 😛
 
40.png
Dorothy:
Jesus is with us, comes to us, and feeds us with Himself.
Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; **and lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age." **
Matt 28:19-20
**🙂 **

**

**
 
40.png
mercygate:
I had the same reaction to the question. As a former Protestant, originally from a “born again” tradition, all the emphasis was on MY acceptance of Jesus Christ. Catholics tend to take it from a more objective angle, with more emphasis on the Person of Jesus.

In today’s Gospel Jesus asks: “Who do men say that I am?” and then he asks “But who do you say that I am?” Peter answered him, “You are the Christ.” Nothing “personal” about that: a recognition of objective truth. Generally in the Catholic mind objective truth is valued above subjective feelings.

Sidebar: The Venerable Bede’s commentary on Peter’s confession notes that it is divinity which affirms the humanity of Christ: “Who do men say that the Son of Man is?” while it is humanity (Peter) that affirms his divinity: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
And I too had the same reaction to that story… Interesting.

I think there is a sense of “just me and God” in protestant religions. We hear again and again… “I don’t need anything but God”, or “God knows my true heart”, as if there were little or no need to have that real COMMUNION with the Church.

Isn’t it ironic too that the very basis for Catholicism is Communion with our spiritual family- yet we are brow beaten for not having the friendly parishes and other fellowship. On the other hand, many protestant faiths reject notions of spritual family… Mary, Saints, etc. and yet they can build some of the most spectacular earthly church families…

Regardless, knowing that during the Mass I am in the full embrace of God, partaking of His Son in the presence of my earthly parish family AND my heavenly family often brings me to tears. The love, the companionship, the support, the honor is palpable… The more I enter into that level of communion, the more I need it.

How can one explain what it is like to be warm to someone who has never experienced warmth… How can one explain what it is like to not hunger to someone who has never been full?

Doreen, I appreciate your question, I really do. I’m sure you experience God in your life as full as you can! But what if there is more? What if there are whole areas of the Faith that you have yet to explore? Mercygate has, as she always does, really put into words one of the most basic, most understandable, and most compassionate response to many of the questions here… But again, understanding what she says may not come from books or even scripture… it will come from experience. From embracing all parts of the Church that God gives us. And taking that step will be nothing short of a move of Faith.

Very few Catholics have been logically convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt about everything relating to RC. At some point there was a step of Faith. “God, if this is the direction you wish me to go… I will.” In the end, there is just Faith.

Faith that God has protected a Church from everything that man could do to it.

Faith that God is using men to disseminate his teachings the way He wishes it.

Faith that he has given authority to those men and that Church to help humans come to the fullness of his embrace.
 
40.png
Shiann:
And I too had the same reaction to that story… Interesting.

I think there is a sense of “just me and God” in protestant religions. We hear again and again… “I don’t need anything but God”, or “God knows my true heart”, as if there were little or no need to have that real COMMUNION with the Church.

Isn’t it ironic too that the very basis for Catholicism is Communion with our spiritual family- yet we are brow beaten for not having the friendly parishes and other fellowship. On the other hand, many protestant faiths reject notions of spritual family… Mary, Saints, etc. and yet they can build some of the most spectacular earthly church families…

Regardless, knowing that during the Mass I am in the full embrace of God, partaking of His Son in the presence of my earthly parish family AND my heavenly family often brings me to tears. The love, the companionship, the support, the honor is palpable… The more I enter into that level of communion, the more I need it.

How can one explain what it is like to be warm to someone who has never experienced warmth… How can one explain what it is like to not hunger to someone who has never been full?

Doreen, I appreciate your question, I really do. I’m sure you experience God in your life as full as you can! But what if there is more? What if there are whole areas of the Faith that you have yet to explore? Mercygate has, as she always does, really put into words one of the most basic, most understandable, and most compassionate response to many of the questions here… But again, understanding what she says may not come from books or even scripture… it will come from experience. From embracing all parts of the Church that God gives us. And taking that step will be nothing short of a move of Faith.

Very few Catholics have been logically convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt about everything relating to RC. At some point there was a step of Faith. “God, if this is the direction you wish me to go… I will.” In the end, there is just Faith.

Faith that God has protected a Church from everything that man could do to it.

Faith that God is using men to disseminate his teachings the way He wishes it.

Faith that he has given authority to those men and that Church to help humans come to the fullness of his embrace.
Wonderful post as always Shiann! :clapping:
:blessyou:
 
40.png
Shiann:
Very few Catholics have been logically convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt about everything relating to RC. At some point there was a step of Faith. “God, if this is the direction you wish me to go… I will.” In the end, there is just Faith.
You SAID it! But for me, there came a point when I realized that already 100 things I had objected to in Catholic theology had fallen into place, so the last couple of issues (Mary, Mary and Mary – to quote Scott Hahn) just had to be subordinated to the rest. Too much else was true. I had to trust the Church.

Looking back, I see that my acceptance of these dogmas, despite my resistance to them (repugnance?), was the REAL act of faith.
 
40.png
Shiann:
I think there is a sense of “just me and God” in protestant religions. We hear again and again… “I don’t need anything but God”, or “God knows my true heart”, as if there were little or no need to have that real COMMUNION with the Church.
I can say that I have a “personal” relationship with Christ…which when I first heard of such a thing, baffled me…but now I understand how very personal it can be. I DO NOT however believe that I don’t need anything but God…and I don’t believe my counterparts feel that way either. That is a silly generalization based on a few who decide to isolate themselves when the pressure is on.

I am fully aware of the need to fellowship together, encourage one another, and spur one another on to love and good deeds. That is a HUGE part of my walk and I do need to be held accountable by my husband and my Christian brothers and sisters.
Isn’t it ironic too that the very basis for Catholicism is Communion with our spiritual family- yet we are brow beaten for not having the friendly parishes and other fellowship. On the other hand, many protestant faiths reject notions of spritual family… Mary, Saints, etc. and yet they can build some of the most spectacular earthly church families…
You are misunderstanding something here. Many protestants do not reject the Saints. They understand the role of the Saints differently than you do, but they count them as members of the Family of God who will be present at the marriage supper of the Lamb one day.

The reason Protestants (many of them) have spectacular church families, is because they take seriously the command to love one another, and to love thy neighbor as thyself…just as many Catholics do. 🙂
Regardless, knowing that during the Mass I am in the full embrace of God, partaking of His Son in the presence of my earthly parish family AND my heavenly family often brings me to tears. The love, the companionship, the support, the honor is palpable… The more I enter into that level of communion, the more I need it.
Just as I feel the need for more of Him in my life…through times of quietness and prayer.
How can one explain what it is like to be warm to someone who has never experienced warmth… How can one explain what it is like to not hunger to someone who has never been full?
You don’t have to explain this to me. I know His satisfaction. This is why I am asking this question. I am thinking…“Hello! How can there be more than this?” Not saying that I am at the end of my journey…not saying that I think I know and have experienced ALL of Him that there is to know and experience…but that, I feel satisfied in my soul. I feel connected with my God and King, and I have truly sought FIRST the kingdom of God…and all these things are being added unto me. So it seems odd that He’d require me to perform acts of penance on top of a simple confession and surrender and trust.
D. (to be continued)
 
Doreen, I appreciate your question, I really do. I’m sure you experience God in your life as full as you can! But what if there is more? What if there are whole areas of the Faith that you have yet to explore? Mercygate has, as she always does, really put into words one of the most basic, most understandable, and most compassionate response to many of the questions here… But again, understanding what she says may not come from books or even scripture… it will come from experience. From embracing all parts of the Church that God gives us. And taking that step will be nothing short of a move of Faith.

Very few Catholics have been logically convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt about everything relating to RC. At some point there was a step of Faith. “God, if this is the direction you wish me to go… I will.” In the end, there is just Faith.

Faith that God has protected a Church from everything that man could do to it.

Faith that God is using men to disseminate his teachings the way He wishes it.

Faith that he has given authority to those men and that Church to help humans come to the fullness of his embrace.
And this explains a little bit of my apprehension with the Catholic thinking.

You are really saying you trust God to protect your church over others.

You are saying that you believe God entrusted His Word to only certain men, who then passed it on to other men.

And you believe that the church you speak of has not changed since the day He ascended into heaven.

But here’s the problem: If you look at early church history, you’ll see how the “Catholic” church has seriously changed. The apostles preached that we hold on to the truth and not add to it, but as early as A.D. 70, you will see that, over time, the papacy claimed more and more power for itself, the papal church introduced the following: baptismal regeneration, justification by works, celibacy, confessional rules, purgatory, transubstantiation, indulgences and penance (to name a few) during the dark ages –

there were serious problems in the church at this time, and pure Christianity was maintained by a few outside the papacy…since these new teachings were a doctrine organized by man…many of the sacraments are only as old as the “Dark Ages”…(A.D. 600-1500) some were not even heard of before that time.

And the church that Christ calls His own was the church of “pure Christianity”…not adding anything to the Sacrifice of Christ, but being “The Church of the First Born” (meaning…we must be “born into” this church by the transforming of our minds.)

The reformation DID challenge and change the church you claim to be infallible and unchanging. The Jesuit priesthood would attest to that, no?

In one text, I found that the actual “papal infallibility” wasn’t proclaimed until 1870!

I know there are Scriptures that say that there is One Church, One Faith, and I believe He will call all “believers” unto Himself…but when I study revelation and history, evidence suggests that many who put their hope in “THE Church” are going to be disappointed. But he whose hope is in the LORD will not be disappointed.

I don’t mean to stir up contention by all this. These are simply the things I see as real events in history that have yet to be adequately explained to me…that I might join you in believing in this idea that Catholicism is “the way”.

I believe that much of faith comes by a simple trust, as you say, Shiann, but I am not going to be led like a lamb to the slaughter. I want to understand EXACTLY who it is I am putting my faith in! (This is why my main source is Scripture…and I know you’ll say, well you can thank the Catholic church for that! But seriously, that is like saying it is all the WORD OF MAN and not God. And if you truly believe THAT…how can you trust a word of it?)

Thanks for your ear. (And I realize now that this should all go to a new thread.)
D.
 
40.png
Doreen:
So it seems odd that He’d require me to perform acts of penance on top of a simple confession and surrender and trust.
Penances can be formal or informal, but they amount to the same thing-expressions before God of sorrow over one’s sins, which is not only required by God but also by human nature; human beings have an innate need to mourn tragedies, and their sins are tragedies.
CA
 
40.png
Doreen:
And this explains a little bit of my apprehension with the Catholic thinking.

You are really saying you trust God to protect your church over others.

You are saying that you believe God entrusted His Word to only certain men, who then passed it on to other men.

And you believe that the church you speak of has not changed since the day He ascended into heaven.

But here’s the problem: If you look at early church history, you’ll see how the “Catholic” church has seriously changed. The apostles preached that we hold on to the truth and not add to it, but as early as A.D. 70, you will see that, over time, the papacy claimed more and more power for itself, the papal church introduced the following: baptismal regeneration, justification by works, celibacy, confessional rules, purgatory, transubstantiation, indulgences and penance (to name a few) during the dark ages –

there were serious problems in the church at this time, and pure Christianity was maintained by a few outside the papacy…since these new teachings were a doctrine organized by man…many of the sacraments are only as old as the “Dark Ages”…(A.D. 600-1500) some were not even heard of before that time.

And the church that Christ calls His own was the church of “pure Christianity”…not adding anything to the Sacrifice of Christ, but being “The Church of the First Born” (meaning…we must be “born into” this church by the transforming of our minds.)

The reformation DID challenge and change the church you claim to be infallible and unchanging. The Jesuit priesthood would attest to that, no?

In one text, I found that the actual “papal infallibility” wasn’t proclaimed until 1870!

I know there are Scriptures that say that there is One Church, One Faith, and I believe He will call all “believers” unto Himself…but when I study revelation and history, evidence suggests that many who put their hope in “THE Church” are going to be disappointed. But he whose hope is in the LORD will not be disappointed.

I don’t mean to stir up contention by all this. These are simply the things I see as real events in history that have yet to be adequately explained to me…that I might join you in believing in this idea that Catholicism is “the way”.

I believe that much of faith comes by a simple trust, as you say, Shiann, but I am not going to be led like a lamb to the slaughter. I want to understand EXACTLY who it is I am putting my faith in! (This is why my main source is Scripture…and I know you’ll say, well you can thank the Catholic church for that! But seriously, that is like saying it is all the WORD OF MAN and not God. And if you truly believe THAT…how can you trust a word of it?)

Thanks for your ear. (And I realize now that this should all go to a new thread.)
D.
Doreen, many of your objections here confuse doctrine with discipline and also you do not allow for the development of a doctrine present from the beginning but which later becomes refined/defined as is rubbed up against heresy and science.

Honest. This post is a catastrophe of misunderstanding both of doctrine and history. How did the Jesuits get in there?
 
40.png
Doreen:
the papal church introduced the following: baptismal regeneration, justification by works, celibacy, confessional rules, purgatory, transubstantiation, indulgences and penance (to name a few) during the dark ages –
I am flabbergasted by this comment. :eek:
I think I saw this on a chick tract. :crying:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top