Protestant Communion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IGotQuestions
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As I said earlier, I heard the holy father make this comment in his speech.

**You know folks, you all tend to be a tad condescending. I expected that from the Protestants when I debated them when I defended my faith, but I’m disappointed that several of you engage in the same tactics and we are all brothers and sisters in the catholic faith. **You need only read a little more, research these issues and you will find that what I am putting forth is true. I’m not going to argue with you all. I already had not only all of my evangelical friends tell me I was going to hell for converted, and worse lost all of their friendship, but you folks seem to engage in similar behavior. I want to discuss subjects with my catholic peers. I’m. Of looking for “gotcha” moments.
Who is being condescending, and why would you expect protestants to be more so than Catholics?
Who here said you are going to Hell? :eek:

Jon
 
Don’t twist my words. No one on catholic answers ever told me I was going to hell. Actually they were personal friends and evangelical bloggers on another site. Some of you I’ve found to be rather condescending to me however. And I stand by that.
 
Don’t twist my words. No one on catholic answers ever told me I was going to hell. Actually they were personal friends and evangelical bloggers on another site. Some of you I’ve found to be rather condescending to me however. And I stand by that.
I didn’t twist your words, but you’ve stated that some here have been condescending. I just want to make sure that you understand that I, for one, have no intention of being condescending. OTOH, I think you hugely overstated the influence of the Charismatic movement in the LCMS when you said:
  • The Missouri Synod has gone over to the Hypercharismatic evangelical movement and they NEVER have the adoration of the eucharist. *
    And its simply untrue when you say we do not practice Eucharistic adoration.
I hope I have respectfully corrected the misunderstanding without being condescending.

Jon
 
The definition of Eucharistic adoration for Catholics is not the same as it appears to be
for LCMS Lutherans. Chester was referring to what Catholics would understand Eucharistic adoration to be if I understood correctly.

Mary.
 
The Episcopal Church has Apostolic succession. As far as I can see, the TEC also has Holy orders.
According to whom? Are the one to make that decision?

For Apostolic succession, one must have a line from the Apostles, an unbroken one. Can you provide an unbroken line from one of the Apostles?
 
The definition of Eucharistic adoration for Catholics is not the same as it appears to be
for LCMS Lutherans. Chester was referring to what Catholics would understand Eucharistic adoration to be if I understood correctly.

Mary.
Yes, that is what I understand. The Lutheran adoration is connected to the Liturgy, not a separate one like we Catholics have.

I do not think Lutherans have Adoration chapels either.
 
The definition of Eucharistic adoration for Catholics is not the same as it appears to be
for LCMS Lutherans. Chester was referring to what Catholics would understand Eucharistic adoration to be if I understood correctly.

Mary.
Catholics would understand Eucharistic Adoration beyond the sacramental act - perpetual adoration chapels, etc. Yes, I understand that. That’s why a number of us have tried to be specific about how we practice Eucharistic adoration.

Jon
 
According to whom? Are the one to make that decision?

For Apostolic succession, one must have a line from the Apostles, an unbroken one. Can you provide an unbroken line from one of the Apostles?
I have spoken to a Catholic priest, as well as someone who was an Episcopal priest. Both have said that TEC has Apostolic succession. The Saint would be Peter. I believe that some of the Bishops from the Catholic Church went to the Episcopal church, when the Church of England broke off from Catholicism. Therefore, there is Apostolic succession.

Since the Catholic Church does not believe that Protestant denominations have Apostolic succession, then why does the Catholic Church consider their baptisms valid? It would seem that the Catholic church’s Nicene creed: “…We acknowledge one baptism
for the forgiveness of sins…” is contradictory. If the Protestants don’t have Apostolic succession, then why does any of it count to the Catholic church?
 
Yes, that is what I understand. The Lutheran adoration is connected to the Liturgy, not a separate one like we Catholics have.

I do not think Lutherans have Adoration chapels either.
Not typically, though they can. While the reliquae is not usually reserved except to commune the sick and shut-in, it can be, and in my parish often is, though not displayed.

Jon
 
The Episcopal Church has Apostolic succession. As far as I can see, the TEC also has Holy orders.
The RCC does not agree. As stated in Apostolicae Curae.

Nothing requires the TEC, or Anglicans in general, to accept that. But it is what any RC is required to affirm.
 
I can only tell you that Ive been to many Lutheran churches and never once saw adoration offered nor have I experienced adoration in a Lutheran church, and let’s just say I wasn’t born yesterday. I can’t believe ELCA would have it since they are incredibly liberal and most trappings of Lutheran liturgical church are gone in that sect of lutheranism
 
I can only tell you that Ive been to many Lutheran churches and never once saw adoration offered nor have I experienced adoration in a Lutheran church, and let’s just say I wasn’t born yesterday. I can’t believe ELCA would have it since they are incredibly liberal and most trappings of Lutheran liturgical church are gone in that sect of lutheranism
OK. Lutheran Eucharistic adoration may look different than it does in a Catholic setting, but it is adoration nonetheless. When Lutherans kneel to receive the sacrament, that is adoration. And I’ve seen that in the ELCA, as well. I don’t think their understanding of the sacrament has changed. Their practices surrounding it, such as open communion and female ordination, certainly has changed, sadly.

Jon
 
I have spoken to a Catholic priest, as well as someone who was an Episcopal priest. Both have said that TEC has Apostolic succession.
Perhaps they were thinking of the Dutch Touch.

Yet, Wikipedia says,
Wikipedia:
In 1998, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued a doctrinal commentary to accompany Pope John Paul II’s apostolic letter Ad tuendam fidem, which established the formula of the profession of faith to be made by those assuming certain offices in the Church. Despite the ongoing work of the ecumenical Anglican Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC), the Congregation’s commentary listed Leo XIII’s declaration in Apostolicae curae on the invalidity of Anglican ordinations as an example of “those truths connected to revelation by historical necessity and which are to be held definitively, but are not able to be declared as divinely revealed”. Anyone who denies such truths “would be in a position of rejecting a truth of Catholic doctrine and would therefore no longer be in full communion with the Catholic Church”.
The continuing authority of Apostolicae Curae was reinforced in the essay The Significance of the Apostolic Constitution Anglicanorum Coetibus by Fr Gianfranco Ghirlanda SJ, Rector of the Pontifical Gregorian University, released on 9 November 2009. (Anglicanorum Coetibus introduces a canonical structure that provides for groups of Anglican clergy and faithful to enter into full communion with the Catholic Church “while preserving elements of the distinctive Anglican spiritual and liturgical patrimony”.) In the essay, approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Fr Ghirlanda commented that “the ordination of ministers coming from Anglicanism will be absolute, on the basis of the Bull Apostolicae curae of Leo XIII of September 13, 1896”.[15]
 
I have shared this before…when working in hospice, the son came in to give communion to his father and I stepped into the kitchen.

I heard the prayers…and…I experienced the Lord’s sacred presence between them. The cup of wine was brought into the kitchen and laid on the counter. I wondered how to treat it…I washed the cup and prayed God’s blessings as the remnant of the wine was disposed.

To go further and believe transubstantiation happened there…I remain in the Catholic position…but I do know that I experienced the sacred among them in this private communion service.

Holy Communion is just that…sacred…with no breaks in relationship. I heard an Anglican priest give his testimony on ‘Journey Home’ on EWTN, how he could never make a definitive statement…and continued searching deeper into his soul and there he recognized he was in schism. He eventually became a Catholic priest.

So I also uphold this sacred communion and when we split where we cannot come together before the Lord…I cannot help but believe there is not the fullness of Holy Communion present among us.
 
I’m familiar with this writing. Although I was Anglican I was attending and taking RCIA classes with a Latin rite Catholic Church because I chose to make it my decision to start from scratch to learn all I could about the Catholic Church . I even joined the choir. That was interesting since I had no knowledge of Gregorian chant and I soon grew to love it our choir director is a former seminarian and we Learned the solemn method of chant. I had been in the Methodist choir all of my growing up years and I knew, between the Methodist and my subsequent entry into the Anglican Church, probably almost every hymn in the Protestant Lexicon:Anglican, Methodist and German and French. Entering into the Latin choir was intimidating at first but once I recovered from the shock of the Latin pronunciations, the beautiful chant, and then learning Renaissance and baroque polyphony, I was so happy . It is so beautiful! I am honored to be able to sing this music and participate in the true mass in this way. I have finally found my true calling in life.
 
Perhaps they were thinking of the Dutch Touch.

Yet, Wikipedia says,
Yep.

And the Dutch Touch is a subject that, as I often have posted on here, has not been officially commented on by the RCC. What has been said about Anglican orders is what was said in Apostolicae Curae (“absolutely null and utterly void”) and confirmed as neccessary to be affirmed by all RC and held, definitvely, in (then Cardinal) Ratzinger’s Doctrinal Commentary on Ad Tuendam Fidem, as stated in the quote. Null and void.

Definitively held by RCs, that is.
 
More likely, when king Henry VIII was forcing his new Church of England down the throats of his subjects, he gave his bishops a choice: convert to the COE or you will be hanged, drawn and quartered-and so wl your families. Therefore, he had a defacto apostolic succession by force and coersion.
 
pablope;13200256:
I am nothing if not repetitive.

The question of any RC bishops being involved in Anglican orders, post Henry, would not be relevant, anyway (and would be a case of a form of Dutch Touch, in any case ). The issue of the validity of the ministers of the sacrament of orders does not form part of the judgement in Apostolicae curae
, which is based on judgement of the intertwined factors of sacramental form and intent.

Yep. Repetitive.I know someone else posted something about Dutch Touch. I still do not understand what Dutch Touch is. Can you explain it to me, please?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top