E
EasterJoy
Guest
Wrong. A decision to sin seriously within a valid marriage does not invalidate the marriage retroactively. That is just plain false. She would have a hard time proving he was not open to life on the day they married with the five children staring up at them as counter-evidence of his original intention. If the original intention speaks in favor of validity, that is what counts, not failures later in the marriage. Failures later in the marriage only count with regards to being evidence of an earlier attitude.If her husband gets this vasectomy she has grounds for an annulment in the eyes of the Church. He would be the one that is considered to be committing the sin, not her. There is to be an openness to having more children when a couple is married and have sexual relations. I do believe that she would be able to refuse these relations is the future since the vasectomy would close that door. (The Church is opposed to birth control of this fashion.) So, how is she committing a mortal sin by asking about a legal separation?
