Protestant hymns in the Catholic missal

  • Thread starter Thread starter RNRobert
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is one of those threads that got big relatively fast, and on top of that I was away from a computer because of a necessary trip for two days, so I apologize in advance for not reading every other post.

As a trained and experienced church musician who has worked more for protestant denominations than for Catholics (which I would vastly have preferred, but I became long ago resigned), I cannot assert arrogantly that I know all about protestant hymnody, but I do know a very, very great deal, which I have to imagine is more than most people here. I offer the following thoughts, in no particular order:

First, the tradition of hymnody stemming from the reformation has no strong connection with Catholic worship. It is at its best and on its own terms a marvelous tradition that the Lutherans and Anglicans, for instance, have made great use of (other denominations have rather tended to debase it). But nothing on God’s Earth can make it into something Catholic. At best, it can only be an acceptance of something suitable in the sense that the individual hymn has an acceptable message not contradicting Catholic teaching. (In fact, very, very few protestant hymns actually contradict Catholic teaching,.)

Having said that, there are in fact “protestant-style” hymns that are of Catholic origin. Many of these come from German song books of the 18th and 19th century; so we are not talking about a completely new phenomenon here. That old favorite “Holy God We Praise Thy Name” is in fact a Catholic hymn that was back-adopted into many protestant hymnals.

I would like to point out that I myself hate syncretism and believe in authenticity to one’s own tradition, assuming there is anything in that tradition worth being authentic to (not in question in Roman Catholicisim). If you go back far enough, Roman Catholic worship and the music associated with it is inherently syncretistic, beginning with the Kyrie being in Greek, and moving on from there, but that is rather a different matter than wholesale adoptions from Reformation-inspired traditions because we can’t do any better. The problem is that in offering an alternative (e.g., Gregorian with appropriate congregational participation), we perplex ordinary congregations who, in the US at least, go cross-eyed when someone makes such a suggestion.

Finally, I would like to address the possibility of Catholicism producing its own modern hymnody. The problem here is that it has already been done, with disastrous results. Almost without exception, modern hymns written specifically for Catholic worship are dreadful, comparable to the tent revival hymns of lower protestant denominations if not worse. Give me the choice between those and the strong protestant tradition and I will say: You have given me no choice at all; go back and find another alternative.
 
We as Catholics ought to be thankful for the rich musical resources that we have to use.

I am a church musician and a recent convert from the Lutheran church. I am amazed at the variety in Catholic music. We have traditional, contemporary, multi-cultural, etc.

I shouldn’t criticize the Lutherans, (But I will). They have a reputation of fine music, but the music is so much the same. They have hymn after hymn that sounds good only on the organ. I make a joke that the Lutherans that don’t use any musc written after 1650. That has quite a bit of truth to it. The music from the southern tradition, baptists etc. also has a sameness about it. The contemporary music used by so much of Protestantism has a lot of “Praise God, praise God, praise God, praise God. The end” to it; not much substance.

I thank the fine composers who have given us such varied richness. We can use music of almost any style that we choose.

Tu Amigo, Pablo

P.S. The Lutherans don’t have a copyright on “A Mighty Fortress”. We can use it all we want.
 
We as Catholics ought to be thankful for the rich musical resources that we have to use.

I am a church musician and a recent convert from the Lutheran church. I am amazed at the variety in Catholic music. We have traditional, contemporary, multi-cultural, etc.

I shouldn’t criticize the Lutherans, (But I will). They have a reputation of fine music, but the music is so much the same. They have hymn after hymn that sounds good only on the organ. I make a joke that the Lutherans that don’t use any musc written after 1650. That has quite a bit of truth to it. The music from the southern tradition, baptists etc. also has a sameness about it. The contemporary music used by so much of Protestantism has a lot of “Praise God, praise God, praise God, praise God. The end” to it; not much substance.

I thank the fine composers who have given us such varied richness. We can use music of almost any style that we choose.

Tu Amigo, Pablo

P.S. The Lutherans don’t have a copyright on “A Mighty Fortress”. We can use it all we want.
I can agree with you up to a point. In fact, in Germany, the Evangelical Church (the Lutherans) still makes very extensive use of the old chorales. There is nothing quite like singing “Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland” on the first Sunday of Advent just as they did centuries ago.

In addition, I consider a certain syncretism in hymondy a blessing, though it has been better realized by the Anglicans than by many Catholic communities. Being able to choose within a universe without having enough aesthetic sense to reject the dreck can hardly be counted a virtue.

Finally, I must say that as great a hymn as “Ein’ feste Burg” is, it has little place in Catholic worship, because it is so strongly associated with the Reformation. It is in fact the flagship hymn of protestant denominations on what they are pleased to call Reformation Sunday. It is a bit like the Confederate flag. If it were displayed only because of a sense of regional pride, no one would object, but everyone knows what those who display it really intend.

(The flip side of that is protestants who want the Ave Maria at weddings or funerals. If it weren’t so funny it would make me cry.)
 
We sing the original lyrics in my parish. The change sounds horrrible.
I do the same thing. Even at Christmas, the hymnal we used neutered many of the classic carols. I just ignored the changes and sang the hymns “right”.
 
As a fellow poster pointed out, there are many good “traditional” Catholic hymns…it just seems too many music directors ignore them.

Holy God We Praise Thy Name;
O Sanctissima (available in English too);
Salve Regina (same as above);
Holy, Holy, Holy

I could go on but you get the point. When was the last time any of us heard any of these songs we grew up with? Who stole the songs we sang for generations?

Presumably that “Holy, Holy, Holy” is not this one 🙂

The only people capable of writing decent hymns seem to be long dead - such as the composer of this: http://cyberhymnal.org/htm/h/o/holygod.htm - or Protestant, such as the composer of this: http://cyberhymnal.org/htm/h/f/hfirmafo.htm

Though there are good modern ones - mostly Protestant, I suspect. Maybe Catholics just don’t think they have much to sing about - “singing to God” in “hymns and psalms and spiritual songs” is one sign of inward “joy and peace in believing” - no joy means no joyful songs, which in turn means no hymns.

I love “A mighty fortress is our God” - it’s a wonderful fusion of OT piety with that of St. Paul. And it is immensely encouraging - which is very refreshing. FWIW, the tune was Catholic, so (if one sees things in that sort of way) it could be said that Catholics are reclaiming it. If something is God-honouring & God-glorifying & true & godly & evangelical - isn’t there a very strong case for us to that thing ? Earlier centuries did. And at least Luther was a Christian - Plato & Aristotle were not even Jews; yet they have been drawn on by the Christian thinkers. And why not - unless, of course, some truths are alien to the God of truth ?
 
Well, I would rather sing several hymns of non-Catholic origin, including “A Might Fortress” than go through yet another bleating of “Gather Us In”.

Some of the Anglican hymns are more theologically sound than the standard offerings.

Nevertheless, if you take a gander out there, find the Adoremus Hymnal. Suggest politely to your liturgist and cantor that “Holy God We Praise Thy Name” is one of your favorites (It is mine).
I second Holy God We Praise Thy Name!
 
Gottle of Geer:
FWIW, the tune was Catholic, so (if one sees things in that sort of way) it could be said that Catholics are reclaiming it.
The tune is in no sense Catholic and was in fact composed out of the whole cloth by Martin Luther, who composed a number of traditional protestant hymns, music and words alike. (Nobody said he was an imbecile.) The original version is rhythmically unlike the regular one found these days (generally with a harmonization by Bach), but is recognizable for what it is, and is now frequently reproduced as an alternative performance version in modern protestant hymnals.
 
The tune is in no sense Catholic and was in fact composed out of the whole cloth by Martin Luther, who composed a number of traditional protestant hymns, music and words alike. (Nobody said he was an imbecile.) The original version is rhythmically unlike the regular one found these days (generally with a harmonization by Bach), but is recognizable for what it is, and is now frequently reproduced as an alternative performance version in modern protestant hymnals.
What tune are you referring to? I tried to go to the post you quoted, but it is nowhere to be found in this thread.:confused:
 
How has this been done?
lak611:

In Amazing Grace, "Saved a wretch like me," has been changed in the Hymnals in most Catholic parishes to, "Saved and set me free," which completely changes the meaning of the hymn and eliminates the idea of our wretchedness in the absence of God’s saving Grace.

The writer of Amazing Grace was a Captain of a slave ship who repented and ended up becoming a Methodist Minister and a popular preacher:

cyberhymnal.org/htm/a/m/amazgrac.htm

anointedlinks.com/amazing_grace.html

joyfulheart.com/misc/newton.htm

That’s one very obvious example that comes to mind.

Your Brother in Christ, Michael
 
lak611:

In Amazing Grace, "Saved a wretch like me," has been changed in the Hymnals in most Catholic parishes to, "Saved and set me free," which completely changes the meaning of the hymn and eliminates the idea of our wretchedness in the absence of God’s saving Grace.

The writer of Amazing Grace was a Captain of a slave ship who repented and ended up becoming a Methodist Minister and a popular preacher:
I have never heard the altered version of “Amazing Grace” in a Catholic Church. Every one I’ve been in has always stuck to the original lyrics. I agree with you that the altered version completely changes the hymn’s meaning, and I would not sing it if it was altered.

I am familiar with John Newton. He also became an abolitionist after he found God.
 
Last week they sang “Go Tell It On the Mountain” at my Cathedral…maybe this week they’ll do Hank Williams Sr., “I Saw the Light”.
 
Last week they sang “Go Tell It On the Mountain” at my Cathedral…maybe this week they’ll do Hank Williams Sr., “I Saw the Light”.
If one accepts the syncretistic philosophy of hymnody, this raises another potentially controversial issue. “Traditional” spirituals (and how that is defined is a mess all by itself) such as “Go Tell It” have achieved a certain status even in the mainest of mainstream protestant hymnals and anthem usage in US denominations (I once heard that one in an arrangement by none other than the choir of men and boys at the National Cathedral). Oddly, it can under some circumstances and by some mechanism I can’t quite explain be made to “work,” though it can also be overdone.

However, country and western music like your second selection would be considered by professional church musicians to have no aesthetic value except possibly a negative one and therefore no place in worship, not that this criterion keeps out a lot these days.
 
Few may know that Hark the Herald Angels Sing was written by Charles Wesley, brother of John Wesley who founded the Methodist church, in 1739.

When, O when, are we going to stop the connotation that using anything whatsoever from Protestants is evil? I videotaped one of the most awesome homilies given by a Protestant minister on this very hymn. He had insights, obviously from prayer, that I have not heard expounded by anyone :angel1: in our faith.

“Veiled in flesh the Godhead see
Hail the incarnate Deity!”

Coincidentally, the movie “Sister Act” was on a couple nights ago, and many have seen it. The last few minutes of the movie had Whoopie and the sisters singing “I Will Follow Him” in front of the Pope. The beginning of the hymn was very beautifully done, and then the tone changed to contemporary singing. But I ask, is God displeased with the latter, in preference to the former?

King David danced in front of the Ark (2 Sam. 6:16), which scandalized Michol, but if his heart was full of adoration and worship, was God displeased? Or was Michol being a stick-in-the-mud?

Ryan
 
The tune is in no sense Catholic and was in fact composed out of the whole cloth by Martin Luther, who composed a number of traditional protestant hymns, music and words alike. (Nobody said he was an imbecile.) The original version is rhythmically unlike the regular one found these days (generally with a harmonization by Bach), but is recognizable for what it is, and is now frequently reproduced as an alternative performance version in modern protestant hymnals.

I forget what my source was - what’s yours ? It’s a long time since I read anything on the subject, but what I read was, that Luther took the tune from a Catholic source. None of us is better informed than his best source.​

It seems that ours do not agree. How tiresome. Or maybe USA hymnals have different tunes from those in the UK. Which seems very likely.

On reflection - does it matter where a tune comes from ? (Yes, I’m changing ground.) I don’t think so. If Luther or Calvin can write a good solid hymn that can be sung, and if an atheist can improve the tune for it, I’d rather sing that, than some anodyne pap by a Catholic with no musical or poetic ability, even if that person is impeccably orthodox. IOW - it doesn’t matter a stuff what the source of a good thing is: that is is good, & can be to good use for a good or Godly purpose, is what matters. Conversely, a lot of more recent Catholic religious art is some of the ghastliest I’ve ever clapped eyes on; kitschy trash such as the garbage perpetrated by talentless troglodytes - however devout those troglodytes may be - ought to be a criminal offence, if only in canon law. Foul art will end in foul theology, foul believing, and foul Christianity. 😦

So if a tune is good - who cares where it comes from ? ##
 
What tune are you referring to? I tried to go to the post you quoted, but it is nowhere to be found in this thread.:confused:

The OP was quoting my post 26.​

I’ve had that problem too - it’s infuriating.

If you have that problem again, it may help to quote a sentence from the post you are looking for in your browser - you can use parts of posts as search terms. 🙂
 
lak611:

In Amazing Grace, "Saved a wretch like me," has been changed in the Hymnals in most Catholic parishes to, "Saved and set me free," which completely changes the meaning of the hymn and eliminates the idea of our wretchedness in the absence of God’s saving Grace.

The writer of Amazing Grace was a Captain of a slave ship who repented and ended up becoming a Methodist Minister and a popular preacher:

cyberhymnal.org/htm/a/m/amazgrac.htm

anointedlinks.com/amazing_grace.html

joyfulheart.com/misc/newton.htm

That’s one very obvious example that comes to mind.

Your Brother in Christ, Michael

That’s indefensible - but is it surprising ? That’s what you get when people are encouraged to minimise the vileness of sin & the nothingness of man.​

The real harm in this feel-good filth is that man the all-wonderful does not need salvation, or grace, or God. But that is no different from saying that God is not needed - it’s atheism dolled up to look pretty (just like Folly in the Book of Proverbs). IMCIAO, the problem is aggravated for the CC by its doctrine of man in the state of sin - where sin is not known as terrible in its sinfulness, the Gospel loses half its power, and the Cross is emptied of its power 😦 😦 😦 But if the Churches echo the shallow rubbish uttered by the world, they’ve lost their purpose & their savour, “& [are] good for nothing but to be thrown out & trampled underfoot”.

The Churches are flooded by this cataract of spiritual slurry - it’s not a problem in the US alone; it’s transatlantic.
 

I forget what my source was - what’s yours ? It’s a long time since I read anything on the subject, but what I read was, that Luther took the tune from a Catholic source. None of us is better informed than his best source.​

It seems that ours do not agree. How tiresome. Or maybe USA hymnals have different tunes from those in the UK. Which seems very likely.

On reflection - does it matter where a tune comes from ? (Yes, I’m changing ground.) I don’t think so. If Luther or Calvin can write a good solid hymn that can be sung, and if an atheist can improve the tune for it, I’d rather sing that, than some anodyne pap by a Catholic with no musical or poetic ability, even if that person is impeccably orthodox. IOW - it doesn’t matter a stuff what the source of a good thing is: that is is good, & can be to good use for a good or Godly purpose, is what matters. Conversely, a lot of more recent Catholic religious art is some of the ghastliest I’ve ever clapped eyes on; kitschy trash such as the garbage perpetrated by talentless troglodytes - however devout those troglodytes may be - ought to be a criminal offence, if only in canon law. Foul art will end in foul theology, foul believing, and foul Christianity. 😦

So if a tune is good - who cares where it comes from ? ##
No, of course it does not matter. It is one of the most striking hymns of all time and cannot in its content or aesthetic merit be objectionable to any Christian.

I think it needs to be noted, from a purely musical viewpoint, that Luther lived before the era of modern tonality. He composed his congregational hymns at the same time composers like Josquin des Pres were writing the richest polyphony that would still have nothing to do with modern hymnody. A performance of an original Lutheran chorale in his own time would be nearly unrecognizable to most modern listeners. It is modernizations of Lutheran chorales, in particular those made by Bach, that come down to us for current usage.

Luther did in fact modify some Gregorian noodles to suit his ends, “Nun komm der Heiden Heiland” being one (and a very difficult one to adapt at that)… That is not quite the same as adapting a Catholic tune. My source, among others, is every protestant hymnal which still routinely lists author, tune composer, translator, and source. But as you yourself imply, in the end, it makes no difference.
 
However, country and western music like your second selection would be considered by professional church musicians to have no aesthetic value except possibly a negative one and therefore no place in worship, not that this criterion keeps out a lot these days.
Speaking of country and western music, I have an album of country and western gospel. Johnny Cash does a tremendous version of “Where You There When They Crucified My Lord?” We also sing that song in Church during Lent. Although I think that was originally a Spiritual, similar to “Go Tell It on the Mountain”, not a country and western song.
 
As someone mentioned above, the Catholic Church has appropriated for its own some elements of pagan Greek philosophy where the Church deems it to be appropriate. If that, why not hymns written by non-Catholic Christians?

A hymn is either good with respect to music and lyrics or it is not. If it is good there should be no problem in Catholics using the hymn. Think of it as one of the few gifts you can accept from your Protestant brothers and sisters.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top