M
mcq72
Guest
yes, seek and ye shall find.Those parts represent the various virtues of Mary. The whole Songs fits in nicely with Marian theology.
yes, seek and ye shall find.Those parts represent the various virtues of Mary. The whole Songs fits in nicely with Marian theology.
lol…well first that we seek different things. Secondly, i think it is a truism, that what you seek you will find. The grace is in seeking per His gracious leading, per the desire of one’s heart, even after His heart.What’s that supposed to mean?
![]()
Just because facts can hurt doesn’t mean they are always ‘lousy polemics’.They are even pretty lousy polemics.
And as your Catholic siblings have pointed out, it isn’t facts, unless you accept that there are over 200 separate Catholic Churches.JonNC:![]()
Just because facts can hurt doesn’t mean they are always ‘lousy polemics’.They are even pretty lousy polemics.
Okay! How many Protestant denominations are there? Estimate if you must.AugustTherese:![]()
And as your Catholic siblings have pointed out, it isn’t facts, unless you accept that there are over 200 separate Catholic Churches.JonNC:![]()
Just because facts can hurt doesn’t mean they are always ‘lousy polemics’.They are even pretty lousy polemics.
How many were at the formal protest at Speyer? They are the Protestants. Evangelical Catholics (Lutherans) are Protestants, and they have virtually no relation to other Reformation era movements.JonNC:![]()
Okay! How many Protestant denominations are there? Estimate if you must.AugustTherese:![]()
And as your Catholic siblings have pointed out, it isn’t facts, unless you accept that there are over 200 separate Catholic Churches.JonNC:![]()
Just because facts can hurt doesn’t mean they are always ‘lousy polemics’.They are even pretty lousy polemics.
Or, you could simply answer my question.AugustTherese:![]()
How many were at the formal protest at Speyer? They are the Protestants. Evangelical Catholics (Lutherans) are Protestants, and they have virtually no relation to other Reformation era movements.JonNC:![]()
Okay! How many Protestant denominations are there? Estimate if you must.AugustTherese:![]()
And as your Catholic siblings have pointed out, it isn’t facts, unless you accept that there are over 200 separate Catholic Churches.JonNC:![]()
Just because facts can hurt doesn’t mean they are always ‘lousy polemics’.They are even pretty lousy polemics.
Start there. Then stop the silly grouping that designated each non denom church as a denomination.
Then figure out how many basic theological groupings there are. 6? 8? 20?
Oh, then return to the topic of the thread where you actually have a decided advantage about the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Or, you could start a thread about this polemical waste of time?Or, you could simply answer my question.
So what is better, thin skinned or thick skulled?I agree. I’m all for ecumenism. But, all I did was throw out a round number to emphasize the magnitude of division within Protestantism. And, you and a few others are making it seem like I labeled people as heretics, or that they are anathema. I mean, I get a sense of some pretty thin skin here, no offense.
I didn’t bring this up. You are an expert at not answering questions on CAF while reversing the burden of proof.AugustTherese:![]()
Or, you could start a thread about this polemical waste of time?Or, you could simply answer my question.
Define “Protestantism”. Define specifically what philosophical and theological teachings make it an “ism”, then link to the source.But, all I did was throw out a round number to emphasize the magnitude of division within Protestantism.
Your typical ad hominem.I didn’t bring this up. You are an expert at not answering questions on CAF while reversing the burden of proof.
What? That you didn’t answer my question. Instead you asked a question. That is called burden of proof reversal. I love you, I’m just telling you what you’re doing and have done in the past.AugustTherese:![]()
Your typical ad hominem.I didn’t bring this up. You are an expert at not answering questions on CAF while reversing the burden of proof.