Protestants and Mary

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adonia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unless you are being sarcastic and I just don’t see it; I don’t believe Follow Yeshua meant what he said as a compliment. Talk of a one world religion and an era of peace sounds along the lines of rapturists beliefs about the end time where they believe the Catholic Church will play a prominent role in ushering in the Anti-Christ and the end-times… Or something along those delusional lines.

Of course FY is completely right in his assessment that the Church will ultimately win because we know how it ends; Christ wins.

God bless you
I do not adhere that all the good christians will be taken away. I will be here with you guys in the end as well and I will lose my head for my testimony… This is my last post on CAF and everybody has been good to me. I needed to come back and see somethings and I’m ready to move on. I thank Yah for all of you guys and I continue to pray for your safety and well being. Things will intensify on earth soon and of coarse you all know the story about that. Remember if you harden your hearts and stop asking Yah for truth that is a bad direction for us all. Let us all continue to look for truth under every rock, crevasse, mountain top and the valley low.

Mary is Coming soon. I warned you.

Be at peace!
Yah Bless you all!
 
Who said anything about invited?
I was being facetious.
I found this forum, applied for membership, didn’t lie about who I was, and was welcomed.
Do you have a problem with that?
**I have no problem with you or any other anti-Catholic on this board pushing your agendas. Just be honest enough to admit it.

**Now that we got that out of the way, please furnish me with examples of my so-called mistakes . . .
 
Geek(something) wrote:

How many brothers and sisters does Jesus have? James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas are recorded as being his “brothers” in Mt 12:46-50, Mt 13:55, Mk 6:3, Mt 12 and Lk 8:19-21. Look up “adelphos.”

Mk 15:40 has a third Mary being the mother of two of these “brothers”. She seems to be the forgotten Mary in the Bible. Your logic falls apart with true study of scripture.

Some important points.

No where in the Bible does it state that everything has to come from the Bible. Jesus even warns us against memorizing particular verses. Because verse can be taken out of context if not compared with other verses. The Bible says we are to not contradict what is in it. That is different than creating a belief that states everything has to come from the Bible. Also, the Bible was not completed in full form for a few centuries after the death of Christ. The followers till that date could not have followed something before its existence. Especially the ones alive before Paul even became a Christian.

Jesus didn’t speek Greek. Adelphos is a Greek word. The Ariamic word and its use in the time period included cousins and other relatives. Word usage changes in time. Words we use in our own language have changed over time. When reading the Bible you can’t go by the Greek meaning and over ride what it meant at the time in the spoken language.

Point three. I’m tired and going to bed!
Point Four - if I may add:
The Greek word "Adelphos" in the Septuagint - which Jesus and the Apostles all studied from - has a much more liberal use than it was originally intended.
For example:

**In Gen. 14:14, Lot is called Abraham’s "brother", even though he was the son of Haran, Abraham’s brother (Gen. 11:26–28). **

In Gen. 29:15, Jacob is referred to as the "brother" of his uncle Laban.

Brothers Kish and Eleazar were the sons of Mahli. Kish had sons of his own, but Eleazar’s daughters married their "brethren," the sons of Kish - who were actually their cousins (1 Chr. 23:21–22).**

In ALL cases - the word, “Adelphos” is used.

Good night, my friend!
 
I was being facetious.

**I have **no problem with you or any other anti-Catholic on this board pushing your agendas. Just be *honest *enough to admit it.

**Now that we got that out of the way, please furnish me with examples of my so-called *mistakes ***. . .
When we question or disagree, you call it an agenda. I call that a God complex and obviously paranoia.
 
When we question or disagree, you call it an agenda. I call that a God complex and obviously paranoia.
Nope - just be honest about why you’re here.
**You’re here to “prove” Catholics wrong - that’s your agenda. And you can’t handle it when educated Catholics (and there are many on this board) turn the tables on you.

This whole wild goose chase about which Pope was first called “Pope” or Peter and the Keys was just a ruse becaue you guys had nothng of substance to add to the conversation. If you want to go off topic - that goes for Radical, Dokimas and you - start another thread.

Now - if you want to argue - PM me - otherwise, get back on topic:
"Protestants and Mary".
 
I do not adhere that all the good christians will be taken away. I will be here with you guys in the end as well and I will lose my head for my testimony… This is my last post on CAF and everybody has been good to me. I needed to come back and see somethings and I’m ready to move on. I thank Yah for all of you guys and I continue to pray for your safety and well being. Things will intensify on earth soon and of coarse you all know the story about that. Remember if you harden your hearts and stop asking Yah for truth that is a bad direction for us all. Let us all continue to look for truth under every rock, crevasse, mountain top and the valley low.
Wishing the same for you, friend!
May you be at peace, as well. :signofcross:

Blessings,
Therese
 
Nope - just be honest about why you’re here.
You’re here to "prove" Catholics wrong - that’s your agenda. And you can’t handle it when educated Catholics *(and there are many *on this board) turn the tables on you.

This whole wild goose chase about which Pope was first called "Pope" or Peter and the Keys was just a ruse becaue you guys had nothng of substance to add to the conversation. If you want to go off topic - that goes for Radical, Dokimas and you - start another thread.

Now - if you want to argue - PM me - otherwise, get back on topic:
"Protestants and Mary".
Whoa, wait a minute! You are making all kinds of wild accusations with nothing to back them up, NOTHING! I didn’t come here to prove you wrong, I came here to dialogue with you. I was once Catholic too and as you are, I am always trying to go deeper. Don’t hold that against me okay. In my dialogue, I admit that I will defend my faith as you do and if that means disagreeing with your beliefs, then that’s what happens. This is the non-Catholic forum right? I didn’t see anything that said that we must come here to be converted or reverted in my case. This is all about talking and discussing and sometimes vehimately disagreeing, but don’t go making unfounded accusations or trashing other peoples beliefs; it doesn’t bode well for you as a Catholic to do that, remember that.
 
Whoa, wait a minute! You are making all kinds of wild accusations with nothing to back them up, NOTHING! I didn’t come here to prove you wrong, I came here to dialogue with you. I was once Catholic too and as you are, I am always trying to go deeper. Don’t hold that against me okay. In my dialogue, I admit that I will defend my faith as you do and if that means disagreeing with your beliefs, then that’s what happens. This is the non-Catholic forum right? I didn’t see anything that said that we must come here to be converted or reverted in my case. This is all about talking and discussing and sometimes vehimately disagreeing, but don’t go making unfounded accusations or trashing other peoples beliefs; it doesn’t bode well for you as a Catholic to do that, remember that.
WRONG.
I’m calling it as I see it (Matt. 7:16).

Your very first post to me said that I was “so wrong and so blind that it was scary”.
You didn’t back it up with any information or proof - just an ad hominem attack - so don’t pretend to be so noble as to have only come here to "dialogue". That’s rubbish.

When you want to have dialogue about the subject of this thread - Protestants and Mary - then let’s have dialogue.
Otherwise - start another thread about how much of a jerk you think I am . . . :rolleyes:
 
I agree with Elvisman, Justy90. You need to stay on topic. We are all happy to have you, and I’m sorry you have fallen away from our Faith. You’re not here to convert us and we’re not here to revert you back (although we will gladly welcome you Home if you choose it)…so let’s have a healthy discussion.

Let’s talk Mary!
 
I was being facetious.

**I have **no problem with you or any other anti-Catholic on this board pushing your agendas. Just be *honest *enough to admit it.

**Now that we got that out of the way, please furnish me with examples of my so-called *mistakes ***. . .

FYI, I’m not anti-Catholic. I do disagree with some of the teachings of you and your church. I hope that is clear and you won’t accuse me of this again.​

The only agenda I have is to discuss the things of the Bible that we are at odds about.​

Thinking I am anti-Catholic and that I have an ‘agenda’ are wrong. I will chalk them up to mistakes. There’s two example of your mistakes.
 

FYI, I’m not anti-Catholic. I do disagree with some of the teachings of you and your church. I hope that is clear and you won’t accuse me of this again.​

The only agenda I have is to discuss the things of the Bible that we are at odds about.​

Thinking I am anti-Catholic and that I have an ‘agenda’ are wrong. I will chalk them up to mistakes. There’s two example of your mistakes.
As I told Justy90 - I am calling it as I see it.

**You and the others refuse to discuss the topic of the thread and have, instead turned it into an attack on the Church’s Authority and the chronological list of Popes. **I know the game because - unfortunately, I see those childish tactics every day here on the forums.

STICK to the thread or get off and start your own thread about all of the evils of the Catholic Church.
 
As I told Justy90 - I am calling it as I see it.

You and the others refuse to discuss the topic of the thread and have, instead turned it into an attack on the Church’s Authority and the chronological list of Popes. I know the game because - unfortunately, I see those childish tactics every day here on the forums.

STICK to the thread or get off and start your own thread about all of the evils of the Catholic Church.

Funny thing you’re off topic as much as anyone. Notice most post to you are off topic because we’re answering your statements.​

I don’t mind you calling them as you see them; I hope you don’t mind being wrong.
 

Funny thing you’re off topic as much as anyone. Notice most post to you are off topic because we’re answering your statements.​

I don’t mind you calling them as you see them; I hope you don’t mind being wrong.
Well, it seems to me that Elvisman is the only one backing up his statements with sources! He is the only one who is on topic defending Catholic beliefs! This is getting rather old. We should either move on in the discussion at hand…or ask for this thread to be closed. Please choose.

God Bless!
 
I agree with Elvisman, Justy90. You need to stay on topic. We are all happy to have you, and I’m sorry you have fallen away from our Faith. You’re not here to convert us and we’re not here to revert you back (although we will gladly welcome you Home if you choose it)…so let’s have a healthy discussion.

Let’s talk Mary!
I need to stay on topic??? What is this guy doing besides berating me and trying to beat me to the ground with over-rated opinons and insults? This isn’t dialogue, it’s totally ludicrous. Shut the thread down at this point, I couldn’t care less anymore.
 
I need to stay on topic??? What is this guy doing besides berating me and trying to beat me to the ground with over-rated opinons and insults? This isn’t dialogue, it’s totally ludicrous. Shut the thread down at this point, I couldn’t care less anymore.
*“my oh my. You are really something else.”

“Why waste the time and energy? Beyond anyone else here, you have displayed the utmost unwillingness to ponder anything outside your institution.”

“Maybe you should look up courtesy.”

“You treat this like its a battle. What is your problem?”*

When you said ^these things^ you weren’t exactly being the bigger person. Listen, if this thread has upset you, I’m sorry. But you do not have a right to throw stones. None of us do.

Let us all just move on…
 

Funny thing you’re off topic as much as anyone. Notice most post to you are off topic because we’re answering your statements.​

I don’t mind you calling them as you see them; I hope you don’t mind being wrong.
The only reason I went off topic is because you and Radical had me looking for proof of things that had nothing to do with the thread - which I did - unanswered, I might add.
I proved both of you wrong and you can’t handle it.

I need to stay on topic??? What is this guy doing besides berating me and trying to beat me to the ground with over-rated opinons and insults? This isn’t dialogue, it’s totally ludicrous. Shut the thread down at this point, I couldn’t care less anymore.
It never WAS dialogue with you. You came out of the gate attacking (with nothing of substance, I might add) and never stopped. Learn to defend your position or find another hobby.

I will dialogue/debate with you any time, any place, on any thread, about any topic. My only requirement:
STAY ON TOPIC.

TO BOTH OF YOU:
Wanna stay and debate the topic?
Let’s go!

If not - I’ll see ou on another thread . . . :rolleyes:
 
The only reason I went off topic is because you and Radical had me looking for proof of things that had nothing to do with the thread - which I did - unanswered, I might add.
I proved both of you wrong and you can’t handle it.

It never WAS dialogue with you. You came out of the gate attacking (with nothing of substance, I might add) and never stopped. Learn to defend your position or find another hobby.

I will dialogue/debate with you any time, any place, on any thread, about any topic. My only requirement:
STAY ON TOPIC.

TO BOTH OF YOU:
Wanna stay and debate the topic?
Let’s go!

If not
- I’ll see ou on another thread . . . :rolleyes:
Here you are with nothing but berating for me again. What is it with you? You haven’t proven anything here. All you do is reiterate what the Catholic church says on a subject and call it proof. That’s not proof at all. You are no saint my freind. You just stir it up and you love doing it.
 
Let’s debate it then Elvisman. How is it that us Protestants (all of one like and kind in your book) have no regard nor respect for the Blessed Mother of our Lord? Can you start there?
 
Let’s debate it then Elvisman. How is it that us Protestants (all of one like and kind in your book) have no regard nor respect for the Blessed Mother of our Lord? Can you start there?
I’ll answer that even though what I said to you obviously didn’t getting through. You have little to no respect for her. You look at her as a normal human; stained with sin…almost as though people are given the opportunity to give birth to the King of the Universe everyday! You overlook everything having to do with her. That’s where we can start. Any disagreement thus far?

God Bless!
 
Let’s debate it then Elvisman. How is it that us Protestants (all of one like and kind in your book) have no regard nor respect for the Blessed Mother of our Lord? Can you start there?
Not all Protestants are the same, but an utter disregard for the Blessed Virgin is something modern Protestants embrace, as opposed to the Reformers who had great Marian devotion
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top