Protestants: Challenge: Do not use Scripture: Use Logic and Reasoning: Are you sinless (Perfect)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mannyfit75
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
First of all, the God’s Word is not only in the Bible. The Word of God is incarnate, a living Person, the Second Person of the Trinity. If I remove God’s Word, Jesus would not be discuss in this forum.

I also believe the Holy Spirit will guide you in this discussion. Paul use logic and reason to debate with the Greeks, who don’t know Hebrew Scripture.

I’m sorry if you think I am removing God’s Word. I’m not. Jesus would not be discussed here. Christianity is not the religion of the book like I said before. We are the Religion of the Word of God, incarnate. Jesus Christ. Christianity is defined by Him and Him ALONE, not just mere book.
I am not talking about a book. I am talking about scriptures. Scriptures are more than a book, they are the inspired Word of God. Our written link to Him. Why you want to take them out of the discussion I just don’t know. 🤷
 
I am not talking about a book. I am talking about scriptures. Scriptures are more than a book, they are the inspired Word of God. Our written link to Him. Why you want to take them out of the discussion I just don’t know. 🤷
The Scripture is the Bible. What do you think is contain in the Bible? They contain both OT and NT text.

The word Bible refers to the canonical collections of religious writings or books of Judaism and Christianity.

I’ll go in depth with what the Bible is too. I’ll show you that Scripture being part of the Bible is a Book.

According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word bible is from Anglo-Latin biblia, traced from the same word through Medieval Latin and Late Latin, as used in the phrase biblia sacra (“holy books”). This stemmed from the term (Greek: τὰ βιβλία τὰ ἅγια Ta biblia ta hagia, “the holy books”), which derived from biblion (“paper” or “scroll,” the ordinary word for “book”), which *was originally a diminutive of byblos (“Egyptian papyrus”), *possibly so called from the name of the Phoenician port Byblos from which Egyptian papyrus was exported to Greece.

The Bible contains Scripture. In the Bible there is a collection of stories containing history, traditions, etc. So when you are talking about Scripture, you are talking about the Book.

Look at your Bible and tell me if it is a book or not. I look at mine and it is a book.

Pure logic. For once use your brains. I know God gave it to you and gave you an intellect. I’m sure Protestants have intellect, right? Can they reason? It is apparent, they lack the intellect to take up the challenge.
 
Answer: I could not use reasoning on this without first obtaining necessary knowledge from the Scriptures. I’m not Catholic.
You already read the Scripture. God give you an intellect to think for yourself. Base on Scripture, you already know some knowledge of it. Being Catholic has nothing to do with it.

Don’t tell me your intellect itself is the Bible, so you can’t think for yourself? 🤷
 
You already read the Scripture. God give you an intellect to think for yourself. Base on Scripture, you already know some knowledge of it. Being Catholic has nothing to do with it.

Don’t tell me your intellect itself is the Bible, so you can’t think for yourself? 🤷
Is your point that Scrpiture is useless or that we don’t need it? Of course I use reason.
 
The Scripture is the Bible. What do you think is contain in the Bible? They contain both OT and NT text.

The word Bible refers to the canonical collections of religious writings or books of Judaism and Christianity.

I’ll go in depth with what the Bible is too. I’ll show you that Scripture being part of the Bible is a Book.

According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word bible is from Anglo-Latin biblia, traced from the same word through Medieval Latin and Late Latin, as used in the phrase biblia sacra (“holy books”). This stemmed from the term (Greek: τὰ βιβλία τὰ ἅγια Ta biblia ta hagia, “the holy books”), which derived from biblion (“paper” or “scroll,” the ordinary word for “book”), which *was originally a diminutive of byblos (“Egyptian papyrus”), *possibly so called from the name of the Phoenician port Byblos from which Egyptian papyrus was exported to Greece.

The Bible contains Scripture. In the Bible there is a collection of stories containing history, traditions, etc. So when you are talking about Scripture, you are talking about the Book.

Look at your Bible and tell me if it is a book or not. I look at mine and it is a book.

Pure logic. For once use your brains. I know God gave it to you and gave you an intellect. I’m sure Protestants have intellect, right? Can they reason? It is apparent, they lack the intellect to take up the challenge.
My point is that the bible isn’t merely just a book. It is way more important than some recreational read. It holds truths that affect our lives everyday. It is part of a connection between us and God. To remove it from a discussion about God is ludicrous in my honest opinion. Just as it would be to use ONLY the scriptures in a discussion about God. I can not have a discussion about God without the use of Scriptures.
Pure logic.
I think we can all agree that God and Faith almost always defy human logic. The bible proves this about God time and time again in the stories and lessons contained within.
For once use your brains. I know God gave it to you and gave you an intellect.
Thanx for the vote of confidence. :rolleyes: The assertion that I have not been using my brains in this thread so far is a little uncharitable. But whatever… 🤷
I’m sure Protestants have intellect, right? Can they reason? It is apparent, they lack the intellect to take up the challenge.
Whoa! Attitude there buddy, attitude. Calling people idiots is no way to talk to your brothers and sisters. :mad:
 
I have a question for Protestants since most of you accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior.

Are you no sinless?

Or are you imperfect? If you are imperfect, and you die now, do you think you would be worthy of Heaven?

I’m also gonna make this interesting.** Don’t use Scripture**. Let us use reasoning. I like to see how good you are in Apologetics.
Ummmm,

Without the Law given by God Himself, how would anyone know if they were sinners?
 
My point is that the bible isn’t merely just a book. It is way more important than some recreational read. It holds truths that affect our lives everyday. It is part of a connection between us and God. To remove it from a discussion about God is ludicrous in my honest opinion. Just as it would be to use ONLY the scriptures in a discussion about God. I can not have a discussion about God without the use of Scriptures.
You can discuss God without using Scripture. How do you think the other Apostles were able to Preach Jesus Christ. They orally taught them.
I think we can all agree that God and Faith almost always defy human logic. The bible proves this about God time and time again in the stories and lessons contained within.
I have no problem with that.
Thanx for the vote of confidence. :rolleyes: The assertion that I have not been using my brains in this thread so far is a little uncharitable. But whatever… 🤷
I’m not being uncharitable. Just being honest.
Whoa! Attitude there buddy, attitude. Calling people idiots is no way to talk to your brothers and sisters. :mad:
I didn’t call you an idiot. I just said use your brains.
 
Is your point that Scrpiture is useless or that we don’t need it? Of course I use reason.
We do need Scripture but we Christians are not dependent of the Holy Book. We are dependent on Jesus Christ, who is always with us.

Good so you are up for the challenge then? So, Max. How do make yourself perfect?
 
Ummmm,

Without the Law given by God Himself, how would anyone know if they were sinners?
God written in the hearts of man to seek him, know him, love him and serve him. There in in depth calling from within for man to seek God. Before the Law was written, God created male and female.
 
You can discuss God without using Scripture. How do you think the other Apostles were able to Preach Jesus Christ. They orally taught them.
We’ve been down this road before. They used the OT AND the NT because the NT is made up of their discussions about Christ. They orally taught what became scripture.
I have no problem with that.
Oh! Yay! Manny has no problem with what I say… Yippy for me because I only look for his approval… :rolleyes: My point was that Scripture proves that we need more than pure logic to discuss God.
I’m not being uncharitable. Just being honest.
No, you are being uncharitable. To attack my intelligence is a desparate move.
I didn’t call you an idiot. I just said use your brains.
And I quote:
It is apparent, they lack the intellect to take up the challenge.
I don’t appreciate this and doubt many protestants out there do either. I can talk to catholics without calling them idiots try doing the same with protestants, you get farther in the conversation.
 
We’ve been down this road before. They used the OT AND the NT because the NT is made up of their discussions about Christ. They orally taught what became scripture.
At the time the only Scriptures available to the Apostles was the Hebrew Text. The New Testament was not written 20-30 after the day of Pentecost. The OT Scripture testify that Jesus is the Promised Messiah.

His life and ministry was know to the Apostles, and disciples. Jesus did not taught the Apostles to write down everything. He specifically told his Apostles to preach.
Oh! Yay! Manny has no problem with what I say… Yippy for me because I only look for his approval… :rolleyes: My point was that Scripture proves that we need more than pure logic to discuss God.
Reason and the grace of the Holy Spirit can enlighten us to know the Truth.
No, you are being uncharitable. To attack my intelligence is a desparate move.
You draw your conclusions to such but calling you idiots would be against Forum Rules. I was only kind enough to word it in such a way so it wouldn’t be so offensive. However, it is apparent, you are, and I’m apologized.
I don’t appreciate this and doubt many protestants out there do either. I can talk to catholics without calling them idiots try doing the same with protestants, you get farther in the conversation. For now, I’m done with you.
I didn’t call them idiots. It wouldn’t be proper.
 
Do all catholics think that the Scriptures are useless?
No. Catholics view Scripture as inspired, useful, profitable, teaching, reproof, and correction.

I also like to add that it is also possible to preach the Gospel without using the Holy Book. I’m sure you read Scripture long enough to know chapter and verses, by memory. You can also use reasoning in the light of the teachings of the Gospel.
 
Lacking knowledge or discern the ability to learn.
Meaning ‘idiot’.

In any case, we have gotten WAY off topic. You want to take scriptures out of the discussion, why I don’t understand. Maybe you are afraid of being proved wrong. Who knows, but I hope you find the answers you need and seek.
 
I like to add that I posted this:
40.png
Mannyfit75:
You draw your conclusions to such but calling you idiots would be against Forum Rules. I was only kind enough to word it in such a way so it wouldn’t be** so offensive**. However, it is apparent, you are, and I’m apologized
 
you could say that but for the sake of charity, I dare not say it.
I will say this and then let this die… Whether you say the words or just skirt around it but mean it just the same you are still calling people idiots because the meaning is still there. I have not reported your rudeness to the moderators though I believe I am certainly within my right to do so since you blatantly broke the rule but I believe in turning the other cheek. I hope you learn a bit more charity.

Peace.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top