A
AgnosTheist
Guest
You got it already. No they dont.This one was intended by me to get Protestant opinions.
You got it already. No they dont.This one was intended by me to get Protestant opinions.
But the title is literally more appropriate to Mary, since as the story goes- she was actually magically impregnated by God.I think we need to remember that when we use the title, ‘Spouse of the Holy Spirit’, its meaning is deeper than listening/reading it at first glance, just like the church is also spiritually called the “Bride of Christ”. Didn’t St. Paul also refer to Christians as being the mystical body of Christ.
because i’m merely referring to the logic involved. spouse=wife. holyspirit=god.Why not?
IMO, spouse implies worldy things too. Sometimes its better not to make things up. In this way are evangelicals more enlightened, not calling mary the mother & spouse of god frees them from the hassle of justifying ideas that ties God up into worldy & material limitations.To be honest, I don’t have an answer. Wife implies worldly things. Spouse gives a much deeper understanding on the unity that was forge when the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary and impregnant her.
No, I got 1 reply. Please take your inquiry about Catholic teaching on the matter to another thread.You got it already. No they dont.
You seem to favor Protestants more than you do Catholics. I’ve been calling Mary, the Mother of God many times. I also call her Blessed Virgin Mary. Does she destract me from Jesus? Nope.IMO, spouse implies worldy things too. Sometimes its better not to make things up. In this way are evangelicals more enlightened, not calling mary the mother & spouse of god frees them from the hassle of justifying ideas that ties God up into worldy & material limitations.
She wasn’t magically impregnated by God. Magic is condemned by God. Magic invokes calling dark magic to summon something out of it. They often use spell.But the title is literally more appropriate to Mary, since as the story goes- she was actually magically impregnated by God.
Overall I find some protestant sects the most favorable among christians. If you sum up the historical deeds, current events, social structure, ethics and beliefs. Next what I nearly favor as much is the Orthodox Church. And then the third would be Roman Catholicism.You seem to favor Protestants more than you do Catholics.
not for you, but for many pagans & infidels out there, the terms ‘Mother of God’ and ‘Spouse of God’ would be quite an obstacle.I’ve been calling Mary, the Mother of God many times. I also call her Blessed Virgin Mary. Does she destract me from Jesus? Nope.
Though Jesus is both human & divine, the term ‘Jesus’ strongly refers to his human side, and the term God strongly refers to the divine side. I definitely understand the RC point of view, and yet it still doesnt feel right. Many catholics left rome partly because of that term.Mother of God doesn’t imply that Mary is Mother of God, the Father or the Holy Spirit.
Mary gave birth to a person. Jesus Christ, who is Truly God, and Truly Man. Two natures divine nature, and human nature.
i just don’t follow this reasoning when it comes to God. He is above all (the reason He can cause one of His creation to be impregnated without ever having sex). if we are to use the same reasoning for God, then we could also say that if Mary is the “wife of God” she is a bigamist (for she took vows with Joseph to be his wife). i don’t think she is a bigamist, therefore, Mary doesn’t have to be the wife of God for Jesus to be “legitimate”.If Mary were not the wife of the Holy Spirit, then Jesus would be illegitmate.
Your way actually makes good sense to me. Why not call her “wife of God”?because i’m merely referring to the logic involved. spouse=wife. holyspirit=god.
This statement shows a misunderstanding of what motherhood is.Jesus is God, God is eternal. How can God have a mother unless she existed before an eternal God?
If Mary were not the wife of the Holy Spirit, then Jesus would be illegitmate.
wow those are new concepts for me. thats the problem with associating the word ‘God’ in Mary’s titles. It ties God up to material & worldy limitations.if Mary is the “wife of God” she is a bigamist
Thank you for clearing up my point. I agree completely.This statement shows a misunderstanding of what motherhood is.
Mothers don’t create their children. They only bear them until their bodies are strong enough to survive outside the womb.
God creates all children. Jesus, of course, is uncreated, since He is a person of the Trinity - God the Second Person.
Mary is God the Second Person’s mother because she bore Him in her womb. That has nothing to do with the fact that He is God, and therefore uncreated.
Many Christians who have a difficulty with the title Mother of God, need to understand that the title means, Mary is the Mother of God, Second Person of the Trinity, Jesus Christ, who became flesh from Mary’s own flesh.Thank you for clearing up my point. I agree completely.
That was my reasoning when I was a child. Then I began to understand that God is one being in three divine persons, the Father created Mary, the Son was born of Mary, and Spirt overshadowed Mary. She is not the wife of God the Father, in the same sence that she is not the mother of God the Spirt. Yet she is still the wife of God in the same sence that she is mother and daughter to God. She cannot be two things to the same divine person, yet she is all of them to one being.Your way actually makes good sense to me. Why not call her “wife of God”?
When little kids ask, “Who is God’s wife?” why shouldn’t it be perfectly natural to respond, “Mother Mary is God’s wife.”
After all, we are not like the Muslims, who believe that God is a bachelor dictator. No, we call God Father - and where there is a Father, there also has to be a Mother, in order for the family to be complete - because our Christian spiritual family is not a broken family.![]()
Absolutely not. God is divine, Mary is not. Mary was chosen for a special purpose which she served in the most excellent way. So was Noah and Enoch chosen for special purposes. Mary was chosen for the Savior to be made incarnate from. Is this a big deal? Sure it is. Does it lend any leverage to Mary being in some way a spouse to God? Certainly not…Curious, since Jesus was born of Mary by the Spirit, do you think there is any sense in which Mary is the spouse of God?
Why or why not?
Hey Brew…I was wondering do you see where the idea would come from? Because Jesus was born of Mary by the Spirit. Mary is His Mother. God is His Father. Is this not a familial relationship of sorts? I won’t respond again, just curious.Absolutely not. God is divine, Mary is not. Mary was chosen for a special purpose which she served in the most excellent way. So was Noah and Enoch chosen for special purposes. Mary was chosen for the Savior to be made incarnate from. Is this a big deal? Sure it is. Does it lend any leverage to Mary being in some way a spouse to God? Certainly not…
No.Curious, since Jesus was born of Mary by the Spirit, do you think there is any sense in which Mary is the spouse of God?
Why or why not?