Protestants: Do you believe that Christ is truly present in the communion elements of bread and wine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SIA
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
[SIGN]Benedicts[/SIGN] I think I spelt it wrong again,sorry:) I dont think you worship the Pope I do think you beleive in the Pope you can believe something but not realy worship it. I believe in God the father Almighty creator of heaven and earth and in Jesus Christ his only son our Lord who was conceived by the Holy Ghost,suffered under Puncius,Pilot was crucerfied died and was burried,but I believe there are more people than the Catholics who the Lord is coming for.No one is truly right about everything,and his love is for all beleivers,from every walk of life. God Bless Nancy:highprayer:
 
The Bible doesn’t say that the “flesh” is literal. Only the Pope does/has.

The history of this doctrine shows that it was not developed until well after Jesus said those words…You go for the Catholic interpretation, only because the Pope says to. You have to or you cannot be a Catholic
St John the apsostle said it as did his disciple Ignacious
 
The Bible doesn’t say that the “flesh” is literal. Only the Pope does/has.
Actually, Jesus said it. And St. Paul.

The Bible does not say the Bread is symbolic.

Jesus says, “This is My Body” not “This represents my Body”. Go figure. Why didn’t he say that then? :rolleyes:
 
🙂 Hi,Dont you remember I answered that in another post? YYYYYYYOOOOUUUUUUU were not paying attention. Only in Spirit,Yes;)
But that is just it. You did not. You answered but your answer was UNRELATED, IRRELEVANT to what I am saying.

When you post, address the point that was raised. That is how you debate.

Your comments are totally off tangent.

Here is a little lesson.

If we say that "Christ said eat my body, drink my blood, and he meant it litterally.

You should say something like: No he did not mean it literally because such and such verse from the Bible that means that he did not mean it literally.

You on the other hand reply with something like: “But John 1:1 says In the beginning was the word.” And you start dumping verses from Revelation which is no way related to John 6.

What do they all have to do with John 6?

Please put some clarity into your thinking.
 
[sign]Benedicts[/sign] I think I spelt it wrong again,sorry:) I dont think you worship the Pope I do think you beleive in the Pope you can believe something but not realy worship it. I believe in God the father Almighty creator of heaven and earth and in Jesus Christ his only son our Lord who was conceived by the Holy Ghost,suffered under Puncius,Pilot was crucerfied died and was burried,but I believe there are more people than the Catholics who the Lord is coming for.No one is truly right about everything,and his love is for all beleivers,from every walk of life. God Bless Nancy:highprayer:
And you can spell that with Bendayudfuiy or Btiausydf or Andfasjf. Who cares?

And once again, what does this post have anything to do with John 6.

Also to make it easier for you just call me B2 as in Riboflavin:D
 
Actually, Jesus said it. And St. Paul.

The Bible does not say the Bread is symbolic.

Jesus says, “This is My Body” not “This represents my Body”. Go figure. Why didn’t he say that then? :rolleyes:
Well Matariel, you fail to see that they just do not get phrases like JESUS SAID IT, JESUS SAID SO, CHRIST SAID, THE BIBLE SAYS SO.
 
Exactly what I have been saying time and time again. The split after the reformation happened because of pride. Had Luther,et al been more humble, they would not have hacked the Body of Christ to pieces.
**
Hi Ben: 👋

They didn’t hack the Body of Christ to pieces. It is still whole! 👍 What they did was stop following Jesus and started following the Devil. I actually wish they were follower of Christ like they believe they were, if they were we would have only the one real church. Pride is the Devil’s greatest tool. He knows that it works so he keeps using it! **
 
Well Matariel, you fail to see that they just do not get phrases like JESUS SAID IT, JESUS SAID SO, CHRIST SAID, THE BIBLE SAYS SO.
I thought they were supposed to be “Bible Christians”? 🤷

But all I’ve seen is mental gymnastics and eisegesis. Sheesh.

I would’ve thought people would at least be honest with themselves. :nope:

Protestant101 and NonCatholic have as yet to refute this passage from me:
You have as yet to refute the fact that*** trogo***, the Greek word used for eat in John 6 is never used in a symbolic way anywhere in the Bible or in Greek secular literature of that time. That alone should make you rethink what you’ve been taught.
And the fact that, “to eat one’s flesh and drink one’s blood” in Jewish culture, if taken metaphorically (like you suggest) it means to slander and culminate against. If He was speaking metaphorically as you say, Jesus is saying “Unless you slander and culminate against Me, you have no life in you.” :eek:
I’ve never heard any Protestant even attempt to refute that; they must’ve glossed over it. :rolleyes:

Are people really so self-absorbed that they’d intentionally gloss over information that shatters their little weltschuuang, simply because they don’t want to admit being wrong? :eek:

Pride…:tsktsk:
 
Hi Protestant, 👋

The Bible doesn’t say that the “flesh” is literal. **
The bible doesn’t say it isn’t literal. Jesus does~

**Only the Pope does/has.

Everyone up to the time that Satan clouded their minds 500 years agi believed it. Your cult wasn’t around until 150 years ago. What could you possibly know?

The history of this doctrine shows that it was not developed until well after Jesus said those words…
**
It started when Jesus said the words making it Dogma. It wasn’t written down until 30 years later, about 1,850 years before your cult developed!**😃

.You go for the Catholic interpretation, only because the Pope says to.

**Only because Jesus said so! And because we actually have jesus Body and Blood not a counterfeit religion or imitation sacraments! **👍

You have to or you cannot be a Catholic
**

You have to or you cannot be a Christian actually. Jesus said so!

You remain in my prayers. Keep warm!

God Bless**
 
Wrong again. Another instance of your inability to read.

So here it is again. John 6:51-58. Tell me when you read those verses, who is speaking?

Please do answer that question as I would so dearly love to know who speaks those words in your Bible.
🙂 Greetings,I read it all and I will give cross ref.A John 6:51:John:3:13 B John 6:51:John 6:57 Luke:22:19 C john 6:51: John 6:53-56 John 1:14 A John 6:58 Greek lacks the bread A John 6:58:John 6:31,33,49-51 Also for good information letusreas… Nancy:thumbsup:
 
🙂 Greetings,I read it all and I will give cross ref.A John 6:51:John:3:13 B John 6:51:John 6:57 Luke:22:19
Please do take some time to read this. Don’t skim over it.

Okay. If you are going to dump Chapter and verse numbers you have to EXPLAIN how they are related.

So let me juxtapose those verses for you.

A). John 6:51 - am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world."

John 3:13
No one has gone up to heaven except the one who has come down from heaven, the Son of Man.

The two above verses are not related at all. In john 6:51 he is saying his flesh is the bread that will give life to the world. In John 3:13 he says he is saying that he is the only one that has gone to heaven.

John 3:13 IS NOT EVEN SLIGHTLY RELATED to John 6:51.

B) John 6:51-58
I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world." The Jews quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us (his) flesh to eat?” Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him. Just as the living Father sent me and I have life because of the Father, so also the one who feeds on me will have life because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Unlike your ancestors who ate and still died, whoever eats this bread will live forever.”

Luke 22:19
Then he took the bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which will be given for you; do this in memory of me.”

See here, I am thinking that your argument is that he is saying this is a memorial. But we agree with you. The Eucharist is a memorial but also MORE THAN JUST A MEMORIAL.

Here is a similar passage in Matthew 26

While they were eating, Jesus took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and giving it to his disciples said, “Take and eat; this is my body.” Then he took a cup, gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you, for this is MY BLOOD of the covenant, which will be shed on behalf of many for the forgiveness of sins.

Does that spell it out better for you?

The synoptic gospels in actual fact give flesh to Jesus’ discourse in John 6 one year earlier.

In John 6, at around Passover he was telling His disciples eat my flesh drink my blood and they were probably thinking “He’s not making sense but He has the words of eternal life so we will go with him”.

One year later at the last supper, then they realize what eat my flesh means, because now He is holding out the bread to them saying “This is my Body”. So now they realize aahhh, so this is the flesh he is talking about. This is the flesh, the bread, because he says, this is my body.
C john 6:51: John 6:53-56 John 1:14 A John 6:58 Greek lacks the bread A John 6:58:John 6:31,33,49-51 Also for good information letusreas… Nancy:thumbsup:
Now how about you do the same to C. And establish connectedness between the verses you mentioned.

You see, if you do like I do and put the verses together, voila, you might at least come to understand whether these are related or not.

And what exactly do you mean by “John 6:58 Greek lacks the bread”
 
Now, hold on a minute, there Benedictus2… in case you have not notice, there is a queue here! 😃

Nancy not only has not answered the three questions I gave her in order to help her better understand John 6 … but, she hasn’t even acknowledged my post! 😦
Maaaaaan! Please address the points in the post you are replying to.

What does the above have anything to do with my post?
I admit I don’t always change my font, like you do, Benedictus2 … and, admittedly my sense of humor has been lacking (but, these last dozen or so posts of yours have just kept me laughing away! 😃 😃 😃 ) I am aware of ‘automatic fire’, but those have been ‘belt fed’!! You are quite the typist - and your comments are right on target, too.

Your ‘verbal 2x4’ to get the attention of Protestant101, NonCatholic and good old Nancy have been very interesting…and a real demonstration of patience and charity:)

Now, Nancy - stop flirting with Benedictus2 and get down to some serious dialogue. How? Glad you asked. Here are some pointers:

** 1- Read the posts that are specifically addressed to you.

2- If these posts involve reading - go ahead and read the material (it will undoubtedly be from your own Bible)

3- Whether you agree or not isn’t the issue - when you respond, stay on target with the post you are responding to at that time.

4- You are most on target when you can reference what you say. Opinions are like noses…everyone has one. So, try to avoid the sweeping denunciations (like Protestant101 and NonCatholic - not good role models for this list 😃 ) and just give your point of view with some documention.**

There, now, don’t you feel better? Hmmmmm …probably not - but, whether you do or not is not the issue. The list really functions best when folks are focused and on topic. 🙂

God bless
 
Now, hold on a minute, there Benedictus2… in case you have not notice, there is a queue here! 😃
Okay, I’ll take my place in the queue but let me just get a chair as I can’t stand for too long on these crutches.🙂
 
:eek: You guys cannot receive the Eucharistic =(Thanks) this Sunday. For you have been very Judgemental. In response of yourQuestion:eek: St John Chrysostom,Homily 20 "I forewarn,and testify and proclaim this with a Voice that I may hear! Let no one who has an enemy draw near the sacred Table,or receive the Lords Body! Let no one who draws near have an enemy! Do you have an enemy? Do not Approach! Do you wish to draw near? Be reconciled, and then draw near, and only then Touch the Holy Gifts? Did I use enough documintation? The Dummy:p
 
Hi, Nancy 👋

I am proud of you 🙂 This is so much better then your previous posts!
🙂 Greetings,I read it all and I will give cross ref.A John 6:51:John:3:13 B John 6:51:John 6:57 Luke:22:19 C john 6:51: John 6:53-56 John 1:14 A John 6:58 Greek lacks the bread A John 6:58:John 6:31,33,49-51 Also for good information letusreas… Nancy:thumbsup:
Now, the challenge for your readers is that they have to put it together, guess at what you mean by this because you did not say, and generally wonder what is going on. :confused:

Really, Nancy, it looks like you went to some book, got some ‘corss references’, sprinkled them in… and dished it out. You really do need to try harder at this art of dialogue.

How about this - pick one of your references, quote it and tell us why you think this applies to your way of thinking. Multiple references requite a certain amount of balancing - I think providing one clearly stated item would really be helpful. You know, something like we do when we post…😃

I really am confident you can do this… please don’t disappoint me 😉 again.

God bless
 
I admit I don’t always change my font, like you do, Benedictus2 … and, admittedly my sense of humor has been lacking (but, these last dozen or so posts of yours have just kept me laughing away! 😃 😃 😃 ) I am aware of ‘automatic fire’, but those have been ‘belt fed’!! You are quite the typist - and your comments are right on target, too.
Thank you! I wish people would use bigger fonts. My eyesight is not so good and I hate wearing glasses when looking at the screen.

The standard font is far too small for me. The letters seem to run into each other.

Old age. That’s what it all boils down to. Old age.😃
 
Hi, Nancy 👋

I am proud of you 🙂 This is so much better then your previous posts!

Now, the challenge for your readers is that they have to put it together, guess at what you mean by this because you did not say, and generally wonder what is going on. :confused:

Really, Nancy, it looks like you went to some book, got some ‘corss references’, sprinkled them in… and dished it out. You really do need to try harder at this art of dialogue.

How about this - pick one of your references, quote it and tell us why you think this applies to your way of thinking. Multiple references requite a certain amount of balancing - I think providing one clearly stated item would really be helpful. You know, something like we do when we post…😃

I really am confident you can do this… please don’t disappoint me 😉 again.

God bless
😛 I could read you the whole bible and you still would not see the truth because the truth is not in you,dear.By the way I do have a boat and do like fishing:thumbsup: Maybe some other time?:rolleyes:
 
:eek: You guys cannot receive the Eucharistic =(Thanks) this Sunday. For you have been very Judgemental. In response of yourQuestion:eek: St John Chrysostom,Homily 20 "I forewarn,and testify and proclaim this with a Voice that I may hear! Let no one who has an enemy draw near the sacred Table,or receive the Lords Body! Let no one who draws near have an enemy! Do you have an enemy? Do not Approach! Do you wish to draw near? Be reconciled, and then draw near, and only then Touch the Holy Gifts? Did I use enough documintation? The Dummy:p
Hey, I am not judging you at all. All I am trying to say is please, make connections, estabilsh relevance when you post.

For all I know you could be the nicest, kindest, most loving person in the world. But that is just not relevant in this discussion.

And, YOU ARE NOT MY ENEMY. Just someone I am having a debate with. To prove that here’s a hug :hug1:. And I mean it.🙂
 
He’s everything you say but he in fact never was 2 places at one time in the human body,for that would deny the fact he came to earth as a man in the flesh,and people in the flesh just cannot be 2 places at the same time.
Isn’t that circular reasoning? You don’t believe that Christ was ever physically in 2 places at once because you don’t believe in the physical presence of Christ in the Eucharist. But you’re also using that as a basis for denying the physical presence of Christ in the Eucharist in the first place.
 
Hey, I am not judging you at all. All I am trying to say is please, make connections, estabilsh relevance when you post.

For all I know you could be the nicest, kindest, most loving person in the world. But that is just not relevant in this discussion.

And, YOU ARE NOT MY ENEMY. Just someone I am having a debate with. To prove that here’s a hug :hug1:. And I mean it.🙂
:hug1: You are not my enemy either I’ll try harder to stay focused:console: Nancy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top