T
Topper17
Guest
Hi Jon,
Thanks for your response.
One of the Fathers, and I am sure I could find it if I looked, said that one of the marks of heresy is that it begats even more heresy. When we look at the doctrinal confusion that IS Protestantism, how can we not see it for what it really is?
While it is true that Protestantism was born out of the Catholic Church, that entirely misses the point. There are many other ‘groups’ that were born out of the Catholic Church. An alphabetic list of these groups would begin something like this:
Adoptionism, Apollinarism, Arianism, Docetism……….
Of course the list goes on and on and it extends through all 20 Christian centuries. It appears that you would like to make the Catholic Church responsible for all of these groups. But Jon, what about the responsibility that these groups must accept for their own rebellion?
I am not at all sure what your point is here. Could you please explain it to me?
God Bless You Jon, Topper
Thanks for your response.
We agree on the importance of the Word, but I would guess that we disagree on what the term means, and we certainly disagree on what the Word Teaches. As for the Sacraments, you number them at two and we at seven. You say that the number is unimportant and we say that all seven are important. So, in this respect, we don’t exactly have the same ‘baseline’.And as you know, I have a baseline, and that is word and sacrament. With due respect, there are no communions in the Reformed or Anabaptist traditions that I could even consider. So, the “uncountable number of competing communions” gets boiled down rather quickly.
I would predict that as time moves on, a smaller and smaller percentage of Lutherans will be members of communions that you would be in the realm of your future consideration. In other words, Lutheranism will continue to move away from the beliefs that you consider to be ‘Lutheran’.See, that’s why I asked what communion you were in, because the considerations on my part already exclude the vast majority. Even some Lutheran synods are now outside my realm of consideration.
If, as you agree, it was not in God’s plan to have His people SO divided, then what is it, specifically and exactly that we should be doing to reunite His people.Its not, but if we humans, starting with Adam, had followed God’s plan in the first place…
I am perfectly happy to be known as a Roman Catholic and would not want to be known as anything else. Do you feel the same way about being called a Lutheran?My point was they started out that way. I generally do not use the term “Roman Catholic” because there are some here that don’t like it, but I don’t think of either as derogatory, either. somewhat inaccurate, but not derogatory.
Ok, let’s talk about Western Christendom specifically. Of the roughly 80% of Christianity which is ‘Western’, you have two groups. Roman Catholics comprise about 64% of Western Christianity, whereas Protestantism makes up about 36%. In other words 64% of Western Christendom is united with Rome, and the 36% is fragmented into some tens of thousands of doctrinally conflicting denominations.Every division in the west has its roots in the western Church.
One of the Fathers, and I am sure I could find it if I looked, said that one of the marks of heresy is that it begats even more heresy. When we look at the doctrinal confusion that IS Protestantism, how can we not see it for what it really is?
While it is true that Protestantism was born out of the Catholic Church, that entirely misses the point. There are many other ‘groups’ that were born out of the Catholic Church. An alphabetic list of these groups would begin something like this:
Adoptionism, Apollinarism, Arianism, Docetism……….
Of course the list goes on and on and it extends through all 20 Christian centuries. It appears that you would like to make the Catholic Church responsible for all of these groups. But Jon, what about the responsibility that these groups must accept for their own rebellion?
I am not at all sure what your point is here. Could you please explain it to me?
God Bless You Jon, Topper